Connect with us

Lattice-wound RF choke replacement, 50 years later

Discussion in 'Electronic Components' started by Tim Shoppa, Aug 12, 2005.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Tim Shoppa

    Tim Shoppa Guest

    I'm fixing up some older ham transmitters. 811 or 6146 finals, etc. in
    the 50-200 watt class.

    Invariably these have sat on the shelf for so long because the RF choke
    for the final died a horrible death (sometimes charred beyond
    recognition) in their final use. I myself have fried/burnt several RF
    chokes and other final components in Heathkits etc. but that was many
    years ago when I could order exact spare parts. Sometimes a capacitor
    or two is burnt up too, but these I already have in the junkbox or can
    buy off-the-shelf.

    The chokes that burned up seem to be between 1mH and 2.5mH or so, and
    were lattice-wound on what seems to be a ceramic form. Maybe it's a
    ferrite, but I don't think so.

    6146/811/sweep tube handbook construction articles from the 50's show
    similar RF chokes in their circuits and part numbers like "National
    R-100" and "Ohmite Z-214".

    I look in modern catalogs and I see molded (almost certainly ferrite
    core) RF chokes in the right inductance (low mH) and current (100mA to
    a few hundred mA) range but they look nothing like the old
    lattice-wound choke. Are these suitable substitutes for the originals?
    Something in the back of my head says that ferrite core losses with
    all that RF across the choke will make the thing burn up at transmitter
    RF power levels even if I'm below the DC current limit for these parts.

    AES lists some pi-wound 1mH and 2.5mH RF chokes (ferrite core) that
    look more like the original. Better idea for these?

    If I wanted to learn to rewind the original chokes (very often they
    double as ceramic supports for the anti-parasitic RL network and plate
    caps) are there any web resources that would tell me how to wind my own
    lattice-wound RF chokes? I've wound my share of simple solenoidal
    coils in repair/homebrew endeavors, but the slices in these RF chokes
    seem very ornately wound. I think there's a Lindsay or similar book
    about coil winding, is that on my "gotta own" list?

    Oh well, back to replacing those smoking electrolytics in the power
    supply, I know how to do that!

    Tim.
     
  2. Wes Stewart

    Wes Stewart Guest

    Tim,

    The idea behind the multiple section windings on these chokes is the
    prevention of unwanted resonances.

    The choke must present a much higher impedance than the plate
    impedance over a wide frequency range. A single solenoid that has
    enough inductance at the low frequency end is going to have a lot of
    self-capacitance and will wind up (no pun intended) with unwanted
    resonances at some other frequency(ies) in the operating range. Above
    any parallel resonance the reactance will go capacitive with
    disastrous results.

    In an attempt to control this, the chokes are effectively broken up
    into several smaller and dissimilar chokes connected in series.

    Here is an example of a solenoid wound choke that uses different
    winding lengths and diameters to place resonances outside the range of
    operation:

    http://www.qsl.net/n7ws/RF_Choke.jpg

    I see no theoretical reason why ferrite loaded chokes cannot be used
    as long as all of the design caveats are observed.
     
  3. Highland Ham

    Highland Ham Guest

    The choke must present a much higher impedance than the plate
    ===========================
    Suitability of any choke for this application can be readily checked (in
    circuit )with a grid dipper ,which should NOT indicate resonance within any
    of the used bands.

    Frank GM0CSZ / KN6WH
     
  4. Guest

    From: Wes Stewart on Fri 12 Aug 2005 10:09
    Absolutely. A self-parallel-resonant inductor above its
    resonant frequency will appear as a CAPACITOR.
    Excellent photo quality there, Wes. Also, it amused me to see
    so MANY sections on that RFC assembly! :) I've seen quite a
    few and "dipped the plate, peaked the grid" on many an HF
    transmitter of olden times using such RF chokes.
    I can only add that the Micrometals *free* toroid calculator
    incorporates approximate self-resonant frequencies in their
    program's calculations. Excellent program for toroidal inductor
    design...can't beat the price! :) www.micrometals.com

    Problem is, if this is a restoration kind of project similar to
    old automobile restoration, toroidal forms won't do...just
    weren't many in the old transmitters of the 1950s and before.
    Anything of the same construction type is going to be an
    expensive special-order thing now. :-(

     
  5. Roy Lewallen

    Roy Lewallen Guest

    Micrometals manufactures powdered iron, not ferrite, cores. The two
    materials are quite different. Among the larger manufacturers of
    ferrites are Fair-Rite, Magnetics, Indiana General, Siemens, and Ferroxcube.

    When making an RFC using a core of any magnetic material, you need to
    insure that the core won't saturate from the flux generated by the DC
    current. This is done by including flux density in the calculations, and
    comparing it with the flux density which the material will support
    before saturating. Powdered iron cores will tolerate a much greater flux
    density than ferrites without saturating -- but the permeability is much
    lower, also, which necessitates more turns and therefore higher flux
    density for a given inductance and DC current. The presence of an air
    gap in the magnetic path reduces the flux density for a given
    inductance, so saturation isn't nearly as much of a problem with a
    solenoidal inductor than with a toroid. However, once again, there's a
    trade -- the air gap reduces the effective core permeability.

    If you don't want to calculate the flux density, you can evaluate an
    inductor by measuring the inductance or RF impedance while the normal
    amount of DC current is flowing through it. The current has to come from
    a source with considerably higher impedance than the inductor's, say
    from a high voltage source with series resistor, or a transistor
    connected as a current source. The measurement device is connected
    through capacitors. Some saturation isn't a problem as long as the
    impedance remains high enough for the purpose at hand -- as the
    saturation level increases the impedance will drop.

    Low frequency ferrite -- with an air gap -- can be a good choice for an
    RFC because at HF the impedance is resistive or, at worst, looks like an
    extremely low Q inductance. This results in an impedance that stays
    relatively constant for a very wide bandwidth (typically decades), and
    is just about completely free of resonance effects. But again, flux
    density has to be considered whenever it has to pass DC current.

    Roy Lewallen, W7EL
     
  6. Tim Shoppa

    Tim Shoppa Guest

    In fact, this isn't quite a "restoration to original build" type
    thing, it's more of a "fix some old stuff that's been sitting on the
    shelf for years and put it to use" type thing. Most of these units
    are in pretty good shape, and I'm guessing that after the RF chokesdied
    they were swapped around at hamfests for a few years with each
    owner realizing they didn't have that choke and passing it on to the
    next guy... eventually ending up with me.

    In fact, Pi-w
    ound chokes are still listed in the Hammond catalog and
    a couple of them are stocked by AES. I ordered a 2.5mH one which ought
    to be able to handle the 100mA or so that a single 6146 will need and
    I'll grid-dip it and try it out.

    I would still like to find a good reference on lattice-wound and
    Pi-wound coil winding in a do-it-yourselfer's workshop. I think
    I remember seeing a book that shows how to build a little coil
    winding machine that'll do some of the ornate pi winding, and now
    I kick myself for not buying it at the time.

    Even though the choke fires took out some stuff, the ceramic core
    seems to be intact in most cases and I think I could rewind something
    useful and authentic-looking on them. (OK, I'd use enameled wire and
    not that funky real skinny cloth kind!). Again the intention is to
    put these rigs back on the air after fixing whatever is necessary.
    Having
    powered them up, most of them are fine right up to the final stage (OK,
    they generally need new electrolytics in the PS) where everything stops
    because of plate current. I probably will replace the tubes in
    mostcases and I'm guessing that after I get plate current flowing again
    and
    replacing the miscellaneous capacitors blown up in the final
    compartment they'll
    need to be reneutralized.

    Tim.
     
  7. hi Tim,
    yes, a reference to how to do pie-wound chokes would be good - jumble
    wound would be fine, but its probably like cable lacing - you just want
    to know how to do it for the sheer satisfaction of it hi hi !

    the picture link that Wes posted looks pretty good aesthetically (and
    evey toher way as well) - how was it done, how as the former made up -
    looks like plastic, hopefully a follow-up post from The Man? - these
    things also provide a useful way of getting B+ to the anodes of the
    tubes......

    I too have a "accidental" collection of old valve type amateur HF
    radios - (too many, in fact) that need to be got on air as a first step
    - will worry about the "authenticity" of the process later.

    Andrew VK3BFA
     
  8. Wes Stewart

    Wes Stewart Guest

    On 14 Aug 2005 01:25:38 -0700, "Andrew VK3BFA"

    [snip]
    Ceramic.
     
  9. Hi Wes,
    well, not going to be able to homebrew THAT former then !

    73 de VK3BFA Andrew
     
  10. Tim Shoppa

    Tim Shoppa Guest

    how was it done, how as the former made
    What's wrong with, say, G-10 glass epoxy rod for winding RF chokes
    around?

    Is it flammability/gasses made in a choke fire that would make G-10 be
    not preferred?

    Tim.
     
  11. Hi Tim,
    got no idea really - over the years I have sort of got used to things
    bursting into flames occassionally(sp) hi hi , so dont worry about it
    but just give it a go and see what happens. I also dont leave things
    running un-attended, so am not the complete lunatic I would seem.

    To me, the main criteria is whats on hand - there are not REALLY huge
    voltages and currents there, so a bit of latitude in the materials
    selection process seems to me, at any rate, quite reasonable.

    No doubt one of the space shuttle designers on this group will promptly
    debunk my theories.....

    And yes, I sometimes DO represent the lunatic fringe of radio - guess I
    never really grew up. But I have fun.....

    Andrew VK3BFA
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-