Maker Pro
Maker Pro

IR IMAGING DEVICE on the cheap

HANKMARS

Jul 28, 2019
498
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
498
I seriously desire to have an IR imaging device to use to observe circuitry when powered up so as to get hints of trouble spots. However, my desire to not spend $1K and up supersedes the former desire. I currently believe that an off the shelf $100 digital camera and the proper filters and a little hetrodyning could give me excellent results. Am I out of line here? A little overboard? Or can I construct a valuable tool for say $150?
 

Harald Kapp

Moderator
Moderator
Nov 17, 2011
13,700
Joined
Nov 17, 2011
Messages
13,700
My old digital camera "sees" infrared. Modern cameras often have built-in ir filters that block infrared. You may have to remove that filter which is a delicate operation (Google for tips).
Adding a new, ir transparent filte ris a must to block visible light. My old camera had become very insensitive with this setup requiring rather long exposures to get acceptable images.
If you have an old camera lying around give it a try. Do not be dissappointed if the results are less clear than expected.
 

Alec_t

Jul 7, 2015
3,587
Joined
Jul 7, 2015
Messages
3,587
Have you considered a cheap-ish night-vision security camera? (Not sure if they block normal daylight.)
These modules (or similar) are available with and without an IR filter. Perhaps use the difference between their outputs?
 

HANKMARS

Jul 28, 2019
498
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
498
My old digital camera "sees" infrared. Modern cameras often have built-in ir filters that block infrared. You may have to remove that filter which is a delicate operation (Google for tips).
Adding a new, ir transparent filte ris a must to block visible light. My old camera had become very insensitive with this setup requiring rather long exposures to get acceptable images.
If you have an old camera lying around give it a try. Do not be dissappointed if the results are less clear than expected.
Very interesting. My little Fuji digital may well be 10 years old. Not sure what you were considering old when you mentioned yours.A few years ago I took some shots of a lunar eclipse. For a hundred dollar camera, I found the results very impressive. Nowhere near quality for publishing but would even pick up crater images. When I had one of these lunar shots in an editor, I raised the exposure level, or maybe it was contrast, beyond any usefulness as far as the moon's image was concerned. But quite surprisingly, the stars came out. Millions. The camera had recorded the star images but was catering to my eyeball and the settings that I had programmed in. I believe I will not operate on my current camera but rather find a used camera or better yet buy a new low to mid range quality camera and experiment with it. I gather that any IR filter will be an independent piece. I wonder what the actual resolution of the photo chip or photo plate must be. Seems like it could be almost at an atomic level limited only by the size section that the electronics pull up as a pixel.
 

HANKMARS

Jul 28, 2019
498
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
498
Have you considered a cheap-ish night-vision security camera? (Not sure if they block normal daylight.)
These modules (or similar) are available with and without an IR filter. Perhaps use the difference between their outputs?
Good idea. I do have some spare security cameras on hand. Using them would solve the problem I have of getting a live feed from my camera to my computer as the camera goes to a transmit mode and live imaging stops when the communication cable is plugged into its port. Thx.
 

Bluejets

Oct 5, 2014
6,901
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
6,901
I've seen some on Youtube use common old web cameras as well with a mod to remove the IR filter.
Some more difficult than others.
 

Harald Kapp

Moderator
Moderator
Nov 17, 2011
13,700
Joined
Nov 17, 2011
Messages
13,700
Not sure what you were considering old when you mentioned yours.
16 years...
I gather that any IR filter will be an independent piece.
Independent yes, but depending on the construction of the camera may be hard to remove. Care has to be taken not to destroy the sensor by this action.

The advantage of a dedicated IR camera is that it will display temperatures as false colors which makes it easy to identify hot spots. The proposed DIY solution will show only different levels of brightness.
 

hevans1944

Hop - AC8NS
Jun 21, 2012
4,878
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
4,878
I currently believe that an off the shelf $100 digital camera and the proper filters and a little hetrodyning could give me excellent results. Am I out of line here?
Very much out of line. Suggest you read up on thermal infrared cameras, which are mainly sensitive to IR radiation in the 8 to 14 μm wavelength range. Silicon-based visible imaging cameras only have a near-IR response that peaks at about 0.9 μm. FLIR Corporation makes a suitable imaging camera that sells for around $300. Try this page for starters and links to more information.

There may now be low-resolution, raw microbolometer, sensor arrays available, especially from Asian sources, but good luck trying to use them. I would want to see something on the order of 100 x 100 pixels or better before wasting any of my time on them.

Most black plastic, such as heavy-duty (thick) contractor bags, are transparent to infrared radiation. You will need either a germanium or zinc selenide lens to focus thermal IR images onto the sensor plane. Ordinary photographic lens are opaque to the range of wavelengths that you need to image.
 
Last edited:

skenn_ie

Sep 7, 2009
33
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
33
I would like to buy/build a thermal imaging camera for marine casualty searches, but I suspect that is a whole different ball game.
 

hevans1944

Hop - AC8NS
Jun 21, 2012
4,878
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
4,878
I would like to buy/build a thermal imaging camera for marine casualty searches, but I suspect that is a whole different ball game.
I suspect it is. Why do you think a thermal imaging camera would be of any use at all for marine casualty searches? Are you looking for living survivors above or below the water? If not living, then after a few hours exposure to the marine environment everything reaches the same temperature. A thermal imaging camera is "blind" to objects at the same temperature as their surroundings. Tell us what you are trying to do before concluding a thermal imaging camera is right for you.
 

narkeleptk

Oct 3, 2019
74
Joined
Oct 3, 2019
Messages
74
I seriously desire to have an IR imaging device to use to observe circuitry when powered up so as to get hints of trouble spots. However, my desire to not spend $1K and up supersedes the former desire. I currently believe that an off the shelf $100 digital camera and the proper filters and a little hetrodyning could give me excellent results. Am I out of line here? A little overboard? Or can I construct a valuable tool for say $150?

you can find Flir C2's on ebay for around $200 sometimes (used)
I got one awhile back but rarely ever use it as its not as useful as I thought it would be.
 

Tha fios agaibh

Aug 11, 2014
2,252
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Messages
2,252
you can find Flir C2's on ebay for around $200 sometimes
The resolution of a C2 sucks (4800 pixels) to be of much use.

You need much higher resolution to see detail for electronics use.

Btw, If anyone is interested, I've got a Flir E4 upgraded software to E8 resolution (76,800 pixels) for sale at a fair price.
 

narkeleptk

Oct 3, 2019
74
Joined
Oct 3, 2019
Messages
74
The resolution of a C2 sucks (4800 pixels) to be of much use.

You need much higher resolution to see detail for electronics use.

Btw, If anyone is interested, I've got a Flir E4 upgraded software to E8 resolution (76,800 pixels) for sale at a fair price.

Its good for the price range op talked about and is in a nice small convenient unit. I see detail plenty good enough with it for repair work and considering how little I even use IR I don't think I could suggest something 10X over what the op was looking to spend.
 
Top