Robert L. Bass said:
I'm only responding to months of nonsense from you, Franky. If you can't
stand the heat, get out of the newsgroup.
Bingo!!! That's what this is all about... You'd just love to see me leave
wouldn't you?? You view me as one of your more credible detractors because
I refrain from attacking your wife, kids, cat, dog, and tropical fish...
I've also proven you're a liar and a fraud and done so without resorting to
name calling or derogatory remarks... *You* have provided more than
sufficient material yourself to prove my point... Ahhh, Robert, "What a
tangled web we weave when we but practice to deceive."
You like to pick on me all the time. OK, my turn. If you don't like having
someone point out all the stupid lies you tell, you have two choices. You
can stop picking fights or you can stop telling lies. Unfortunately for
you, it seems you have neither the decency for the first option nor the
strength of character for the second.
Hello??? Mr. Bass... I'm really sorry, but this time you're the one that
started this latest "round"... I'd suggest you sorta calm down... sip a
few brewskies... take a nice dip in your pool...
Nope. Just stop your nonsense and stop telling stupid lies about catching
politicians dumpster diving out of their Jaguars, flying upside down in 737
airliners and riding magical, levitating ladders. It's so easy, Franky.
All you have to do is start being honest (fat chance of that) and I'll leave
you alone.
OK... so... the 737 "story"... you dragged that up, I didn't... I
haven't mention the ladder (which I now *know* you hexed) for months... you
dragged that up... You'd be happy if I just "shut up" and lurk... Is that
what you're saying??? If I did that, Unca Robbie, would you *really* leave
me alone??? Huh??? Huh???
By the way... You *contend* that it's impossible to perform a roll in a 737
when in fact it's much more manoeverable that a 707 (for which a kind soul
was able to post an actual link that demonstrated you can roll this aircraft
successfully). You *contend* that it would be impossible for me to be
electrocuted while standing on an aluminum ladder... you weren't there...
How could you *know* the circumstances surrounding that? Another thing...
You don't know me either. I've never posted to a USENET group before this
one. Yet you call me an inveterate liar... You have a verifiable history
of telling lies and disrupting newsgroups. I don't (except for your own
rather twisted imaginings)... There's a *huge* difference between us,
Robert... You can't prove I lied about anything and that irks you more than
you can say so you'll continue attacking me with "innuendo". "Fill your
boots", bud... I could care less...
I'll save you a whole lot of heartache, Robert... I haven't lied in this
newsgroup or in any other...
Short memory span, eh Franky? Hint: If you evert start to tell the truth
it will be easier to remember what you said.
I've got no problem remembering what I said... you do however...
Not in this lifetime, Franky. I wouldn't want to be in charge even if that
was an option.
Hmmm... Seems to me that's what you want... to be "in charge"? C'mon,
Robbie... You'd like nothing better than for all of us to just shut up and
let you have free "reign" in the newsgroup... Your own personal message
board... FAT CHANCE!!!...
Try to understand this basic concept of USENET, Franky. I know it's
difficult but maybe if you take a deep breath and squint your eyes shut
you'll grasp it. NO ONE IS IN CHARGE! (Sorry for yelling). That
especially means you.
As to agenda, mine has never been hidden. I've always been up front about
my reason for being here. I help DIY'rs and newbies by posting FAQ pages,
links and instructional material. I explain how to install alarms and how
to service them. In the process I hope to win a few customers. So far it's
working.
There are lots of professionals that participate here that answer questions
(help DIYer's and newbies) without pushing a self-seeking agenda... It's
called "ethics" Robert, but you can't even begin to comprehend can you???
Oh, yes it is, Franky. You've insulted me, my business and anyone who
disagreed with you for some time now.
I've pointed out where you've blatantly lied (and posted proof)... all
you've managed to do is make feeble attempts to discredit or besmirch the
character of a participant in this newsgroup that won't support your
self-serving claptrap...
Engage "ze Herr Dr. Basz zyco-analist" mode:
You also have a propensity to tell
huge lies to make yourself out to be some kind of hero. This is the sort of
behavior one expects from a borderline personality disorder patient. You
have such a weak ego that you feel compelled to try to impress others in a
desparate attempt to win approval. You haven't a clue
Describing yourself, are we??
Those are fine words which you like to bandy about without ever having
exercised them.
Ohhh... another "flame"...
In your dreams, perhaps. The simple facts of the matter are that the 737
isn't built to handle such a maneuver and it can not recover from a sudden
inversion at that altitude.
Prove it... post the independant link that says so!!...
Not only that but the airplane would not flip
over so fast even if you had done what you lied about.
I didn't "do" anything... I was a passenger, remember??
Furthermore, that
airplane has a history of crashes due to sudden application of full rudder
in flight.
Check... when the servo failed... You missed the fact that you can't apply
"full rudder" in flight, Robert (O great aviation "expert")... there are
controls that prevent that. At lower speeds the deflection angle you can
obtain is increased. I guess that means you're a liar too!! Damn!!
The rudder power control unit would have broken and you'd have
stained the terrain.
Nope... The "rudder servo" functioned perfectly...
Everything about the fictional flight was absurd,
Franky. The real problem is you didn't expect that someone you've proboked
for months would actually know enough to expose how ludicrous a lie it
was.
Yeah... you keep bringing this up because you have nothing else (and
absolutely no proof)... You can't even find out where I work...
You never were in that attitude yet. It didn't happen. You made up a
stupid lie to impress the IB and it failed. Get over it. Move on. There
are lots of other subjects for you to lie about. Maybe some day you'll pull
one off and I won't notice but no one believes you anyway.
Especially since if it had ever happened the first time you'd be dead in
less than a minute.
Little longer, actually... do the math... Oh... I'm still here...
Aren't you the guy who doesn't even know that pilots are not even permitted
to bring the 737 to a full stall because it can't withstand aerobatic
G-forces?
Duhhh... really??? So... because I failed to "mention" that, I've
suddenly lost all credibility... Bwahahahahahahahahah!!! Go on, Mr.
"negative" lift... "angle of attack of the wind"...
Aren't you the one who doesn't know that a 737 isn't a Citabria?
I don't even think you know what a "Citabria" is, Robert... You sure as
heck don't know what a Cessna 152 is!!
Keep thinking that, Franky.
I know it for a fact, Robbie... You said so in our telephone
conversation... remember???
Correct. None of the other online stores makes much of an effort to help
people who ask questions here. That's their privelege.
Correction... they make the effort... they "privelege" us with the fact
that they don't try to "prostitute" themselves while they're helping
people... It's called "following the FAQ", Robert... something which *you*
will never do... You don't have the guts or the moral fortitude...
Sorry but I don't recall asking anyone to pay to post here. Perhaps you
have me confused with one of your aliases.
I'll give you a clue... The "price" of admission to *your* sandbox is my
silence... and the silence of everyone else that opposes your attempt to
usurp the newsgroup for your own selfish interests...
Behind the counter at a small distributor in Vancouver, BC. Yes, I know
that. Congratulations.
Oh??? Which one?? Please tell us oh great Guru of Twisted Facts...
Somehow going out on a date with you sounds pretty unappealing, Franky.
Suit yourself... I'm actually a pretty "gay" fellow...
Must be a Canadian expression.
You wouldn't know...