Connect with us

How to design an abitration cicuit related to interrupt controller

Discussion in 'Electronic Design' started by Quang Anh, Apr 25, 2007.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Quang Anh

    Quang Anh Guest

    Hello everybody,

    I'm Quang Anh. I'm living in Vietnam, a small and nice country in
    South Asian. This is the first time I've posted a topic in this group
    for help.

    I has been working in a hadware company for about one year.
    Now, I'm in charge of designing an interrupt controller (INTC) for a
    CPU. This module is expected to work at high speed. Therefore, it's
    very hard for such a beginner like me to design. One of my concerns is
    how to design a fix-prority arbitration circuit whose specification is
    as belows:
    1. There are 27 interrupt requests, int_req[26:0]
    2. Assume that int_req[0] always has higher priority than int_req[1],
    int_req[1] has higher prority than int_req[2], and so
    on, ...int_req[26] has lowest priority
    3. The circuit must be designed by using only combinational logics to
    get quick respone latency

    My first idea to design this circuit can be explained by using Verilog
    as follows:

    input [26:0] int_req; //Request
    output [26:0] int_gnt; //Grant

    assign int_gnt[0] = int_req[0]; //Always accepted
    assign int_gnt[1] = ~int_req[0] & int_req[1];
    assing int_gnt[2] = ! (int_req[0] & int_req[1]) & int_req[2];
    .......
    assign int_gnt[26] = ! (int_req[0] & ... & int_req[25]) & int_req[26];

    However, when I synthesized my design, the timing constraint could not
    be met due to high speed (high clock frequency).

    Anyone who knows how to desing this kind of circuit well, would you
    kindly teach me ?

    In addition, could you please tell me some books or website on
    internet where I can learn how to design an arbitration circuit
    effectively ?

    Thank you very much,

    Best regards,
    Quang Anh
     
  2. John Larkin

    John Larkin Guest

    If the interrupts can arrive at any time, this won't work with
    combinational logic... you'll get occasional erroneous codes as int
    requests arrive in arbitrary time sequences. The best bet would be to
    latch all the int requests in a big clocked register, run that through
    a priority encoder, and re-register the output of that. The clock
    period needs to be long enough to resolve the metastability settling
    time of the input latches plus the prop delay time of the encoder.

    How fast would you like to do this?

    John
     
  3. Rich Grise

    Rich Grise Guest

    .
    I've heard of it. ;-)
    Welcome to the nuthouse! ;-)

    You're getting too deep - you need more parallel power. You might take
    a look at the schematic of the 74148 for ideas on how to get it more
    parallel:
    http://www.tranzistoare.ro/datasheets/185/332134_DS.pdf
    Nah, that link is pretty much all I've got.
    http://www.google.com/search?q="arbitration+circuit"

    Good Luck!
    Rich
     
  4. Rich Grise

    Rich Grise Guest

    Cascade some smaller encoders, say 6X 1 of 5, which then go to a 1 of 6,
    or 5X 1 of 6, which go to a 1 of 5. That'll give you 30 inputs, which you
    don't have to use all of, and will eliminate a whole bunch of gate delays
    from the data path.

    Good Luck!
    Rich
     
  5. MooseFET

    MooseFET Guest

    Since he has so many inputs, I think he may be better off putting the
    first flip-flops part way down the encoding chain. For performance,
    it would likely be best to make the flip-flops as two sections of
    transparent latches (clocked from opposite edges) with an encoding
    stage between them.
     
  6. Quang Anh

    Quang Anh Guest

    I'm sorry that I do not understand your instruction well. Would you
    kindly explain again ?

    Thanks a lots.
    Quang Anh
     
  7. Quang Anh

    Quang Anh Guest

    Hi John,

    I do not have to care about metastability. All I have to do is to
    return the reponse to module sent requests to tell it whether it wins
    the arbitration or not. I have to do it within on clock cycle. I do
    not allow to use register, only combinational gates are allowed to
    use. Could you please give me other advices ?
     
  8. John Larkin

    John Larkin Guest

    No advice, because it's impossible.

    But you could latch the irq's on the falling edge of the clock (a
    transparent latch would be good) and have everything unambiguously
    resolved by the next rising edge.

    How fast is "one clock cycle"? Who is making these rules? Is this real
    or an academic problem?

    John
     
  9. Quang Anh

    Quang Anh Guest

    Dear,

    For performance,
    Again, I'm so sorry that I do not understand the technique you
    mentioned above.
    Would you kindly explain me one more time ?
     
  10. Rich Grise

    Rich Grise Guest

    Study this data sheet for an example of an 8-to-3 encoder:
    http://www.tranzistoare.ro/datasheets/90/455802_DS.pdf
    Its propagation delay is 13 ns nominal.

    Four of these side-by-side would give you 32 inputs - then send each
    of either their GS or EO outputs (I'd have to study the data sheet again
    myself to tell you which, so I've left that as an exercise for the
    student :) ) to yet another priority encoder for another 13 ns prop
    delay; and you'd need some logic to extract the proper 3 LSBs from the
    four first-level encoders, like a handful of AND gates (they'd be gated by
    their respective EO or GS output - again, you'll have to figure that out
    for yourself - that's why it's called "school". ;-) )

    Or, if you _need_ to do it in gates, just copy their circuit. ;-)

    Good Luck!
    Rich
     
  11. MooseFET

    MooseFET Guest

    I had assumed that you could stand a clock cycle delay on the low
    priority inputs. If not the flip-flop idea can't be used.
     
  12. Quang Anh

    Quang Anh Guest

    Hi John,

    I've not checked mails these recent days. I've been in my hometown to
    enjoy 4-day holiday. Thank you so much for your reply.
    In my current prj, we do not use falling-edge trigger flip flop, as
    well as latch. We only use rising-edge trigger flip flop. The reason
    is that those cells make STA (Static Timing Analysis) become very
    difficult, or even impossible. You know, we perform STA, mainly by EDA
    tool.
    One clock cyle fast means the arbittraion should be done within one
    clock cycle.
    Let's me clarify it.
    + At a certain rising edge of clock signal, the request is sent to
    the arbitraion module (there may be more than 1 request)
    + The arbitration module must arbitrate, and inform the requester
    whether it has won the right. This work must be done within on clock
    cyle so that at the next rising edge of clock, the requester will know
    that.
    My project manager :). He told me that he defined so because the
    latency of interrupt controller had significant effect on the overall
    performance of the system.
    It's a real work. As I said before, I'm working for a hardware
    company.

    I hope my answers above can clarify my problem. If you have any other
    idea to help me, kindly let me know. I've still not solved the problem
    by myself. I also wrote a mail to my project manager, but he's very
    busy. He just told me that "let's try your best" :(

    Sincerely,
    Quang Anh
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-