Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Higgs boson found (again?)

A

amdx

Jan 1, 1970
0
Lets call a spade a spade:

The Republicans lost because they wanted to lose.

They (Republicans) know that this country can not live under W's tax cuts.

So they had to give the Democrats the election so they (Democrats) can
do what they (Republicans) could not do.

Raise taxes like Regan did, and save face.
(Regan raised taxes by calling it something else)

Blame the Democrat's for raising taxes, a Republican president did not
do that, saves face.

Now the Republicans want to save face again by giving illegal emigrants
a path to citizenship ( or something close) so they can get elected.

Why start now ??

They have the taxes to now reduced the debt and it was not their
(Republicans) fault.

Life is now good and they (Republicans) did not have to do what they
could not do. (Raise taxes)

H

The preferable method would be to live on the $2.47 Trillion in taxes
Americans paid in 2012. One way to do that is to cut the number of
citizens getting a check from the government.
This article says 96% of Americans have got a government check.

It does include the mortgage tax deduction as a check, which I don't
agree with. Your paying in less taxes not getting a check. But, I
will happily give up the mortgage deduction for a balanced budget!
Easy for me, since I haven't used one for 19 years.
Mikek

BTW did you you say it was Bush's fault?
 
A

amdx

Jan 1, 1970
0
And when they (Republicans) lose in the next election, how would you
explain that ??

H

If that happens I'll just have to agree;
1. The majority of Americans want more from the government than they pay in.
2. They don't understand the severity of the U.S. debt.
3. The majority are mind numbed zombies.
4. The great American experiment is over. :-(
5. I won't know whether to enjoy my retirement or pass the nestegg
on, so my kids can live a decent life.
Mikek

It was quite a ride from 1776 to the 1950s.
 
J

josephkk

Jan 1, 1970
0
So who started calling it the "God particle" and why? I assume it was a
scientist and they are supposed to be ateists, right?

What is really a scream when i hear them make that claim; is that out of
all the scientists that i have met every one practices some religion.

?-)
 
R

rickman

Jan 1, 1970
0
It's as clear as the nose on your face, if you have one. Those that
contributed to SSI or have some sort of medical issue that really does
prevent them to contribute, should be allowed to share in
the funds that are put there. That should be a very small percentage
compared to those contributing if you think about it.

Now of course to put into SSI, you must legally work. That means
contributions to the system... Legals that have a mishap, born with
defects that prevent them from being part of the working society should
be able to appreciate the services the gov has to offer. This includes
those that are ready for retirement that have contributed.

Any one else better have a family member or some dumb person that
will pay their way. I see a lot this happening with particular ethnic
groups.

What really bothers me is a person on some sort of social services while
another freeloader that refuses to work moves in and stills
the services from them. This usually works if the one with money has a
hard time finding a sole mate, they don't get too picky. Some are willing
to take physical abuse from the free loader and tell every one that was
just for love! Desperation can sprout a lot of dumb asses.


Jamie

Jamie, I literally don't know how to reply to this, on so many levels.
 
J

Jamie

Jan 1, 1970
0
rickman said:
Close, but in "Atlas Shrugged" the walk offs started with the people at
the top, remember? I believe one of the first was Hank Rearden. "Who
is John Galt?"

I would like to discuss this with you, but I actually can't make sense
of some of your writing. "can not work due to years of SSI
contributions for retirement or medical reasons" What does this
mean??? There are people who can't work because they have contributed
to SSI?
It's as clear as the nose on your face, if you have one. Those that
contributed to SSI or have some sort of medical issue that really does
prevent them to contribute, should be allowed to share in
the funds that are put there. That should be a very small percentage
compared to those contributing if you think about it.

Now of course to put into SSI, you must legally work. That means
contributions to the system... Legals that have a mishap, born with
defects that prevent them from being part of the working society should
be able to appreciate the services the gov has to offer. This includes
those that are ready for retirement that have contributed.

Any one else better have a family member or some dumb person that
will pay their way. I see a lot this happening with particular ethnic
groups.

What really bothers me is a person on some sort of social services
while another freeloader that refuses to work moves in and stills
the services from them. This usually works if the one with money has a
hard time finding a sole mate, they don't get too picky. Some are willing
to take physical abuse from the free loader and tell every one that was
just for love! Desperation can sprout a lot of dumb asses.


Jamie
 
J

Jamie

Jan 1, 1970
0
josephkk said:
What is really a scream when i hear them make that claim; is that out of
all the scientists that i have met every one practices some religion.

?-)

Yeah, they've learned that it's a good tax write off. :)

Jamie
 
J

josephkk

Jan 1, 1970
0
Close, but in "Atlas Shrugged" the walk offs started with the people at
the top, remember? I believe one of the first was Hank Rearden. "Who
is John Galt?"

The first walk away was John Galt. Century Motors and all that. Followed
shortly by Ragnar Danneksjold. John had a thriving community before
Reardon started to learn the truth. Dagney Taggart visited for quite some
time and went back gun in hand.

?-)
 
C

cameo

Jan 1, 1970
0
No, that's just called separating work from politics. Keep your
politics to yourself and don't provoke your coworkers.

If only the PC crowd would also keep their politics to themselves.
If this group is
any sign, there is no such thing as "political correctness". I don't
see where anyone is holding back on anything!
It's simple: you guys can't retaliate here.
 
C

cameo

Jan 1, 1970
0
What is really a scream when i hear them make that claim; is that out of
all the scientists that i have met every one practices some religion.

?-)

What makes me wonder is how so many scientists who can see "intelligent
design" when they see a bunch of big stones forming a circle in
Stonehenge, but could not see it in the amazing laws of nature, and
really, the Universe.
 
And what happens when they run out of working people, people that
actually want to work that pays these taxes?

"Suck all the teat you want - we'll print more." Haven't you heard,
the government's money is "infinite".
 
The preferable method would be to live on the $2.47 Trillion in taxes
Americans paid in 2012. One way to do that is to cut the number of
citizens getting a check from the government.
This article says 96% of Americans have got a government check.


It does include the mortgage tax deduction as a check, which I don't
agree with. Your paying in less taxes not getting a check. But, I
will happily give up the mortgage deduction for a balanced budget!
Easy for me, since I haven't used one for 19 years.

But, but, but, it's the government's money. You're allowed to keep
what they say you can. After all, you didn't earn it! You drove to
work, didn't you?
Mikek

BTW did you you say it was Bush's fault?

It's *always* implied in everything a lefty says.
 
J

Jamie

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Suck all the teat you want - we'll print more." Haven't you heard,
the government's money is "infinite".

Better start keeping tabs on the forests! If we run out, we can also
stay warm with that money.. I hear they have the bleaching process down
good, we can also use it for charmin.!

Jamie
 
D

DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Jan 1, 1970
0
Better start keeping tabs on the forests! If we run out, we can also
stay warm with that money.. I hear they have the bleaching process down
good, we can also use it for charmin.!

Jamie


So, are we to expect to see you in the news, running over storage sheds
over at the Home Depot?

I think those nice young men in their clean white coats should come
take you away.
 
J

Jamie

Jan 1, 1970
0
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno said:
So, are we to expect to see you in the news, running over storage sheds
over at the Home Depot?

I think those nice young men in their clean white coats should come
take you away.

I'll have to wait in line, you'll be up front holding it up!

Jamie
 
A

amdx

Jan 1, 1970
0
But, but, but, it's the government's money. You're allowed to keep
what they say you can. After all, you didn't earn it! You drove to
work, didn't you?
I wasn't raised that way, and keep forgetting the new rules!
Sorry, Mikek
 
G

Greegor

Jan 1, 1970
0
Sloman said:
There really are people around who believe that gays are evil, rather
than different. I don't know any personally - pretty much all of my
friends are what Americans call college-educated liberals who had to
give up that idea when they first went to college - graduates of Bob
Jones University don't really qualify as college educated and liberal.

My evidence the existence of a gays-are-evil brigade is based what
they write in the "letters to the editor" sections of the newspapers
that I read, and on the abuse they yell at demonstrations that I see
on television.

Are you obsessed with gays?
 
J

John Devereux

Jan 1, 1970
0
Greegor said:
Are you obsessed with gays?

I don't recall much about the subject from him in the past. He
contributed to an already ongoing "discussion" involving them.

As did you and the others claiming an "obsession". Perhaps you should
look in the mirror.
 
Top