My own association was with the Fairchild e-beam group has had been
purchased by Schlumberger. I wrote the charged-particle optic simulator,
designed some of the microscope objective/spectrometers and designed some
beam deflection electronics.
Then we probably have a common acquaintance in Neil Richardson.
Graham Plows' firm Lintech sold the first commercial electron beam
tester as an add-on unit, back around 1982, and my first job at
Cambridge Instrunments was getting it working on a couple of Cambridge
Instruments electron microscopes - not any easy task, because Graham
Plows had a salesman's approach to development, which was to maximise
the number of features on his system, rather than spending more time
on a smaller number of features that would work reliably.
Neil Richardson was his in-house electronic engineer at the time, and
I had some contact with him before he took one of the early units off
to Fairchild in California, to get it working and train the people who
were going to use it.
Effectively, he never came back, and Graham had to hire himself
another electronic engineer.
With Graham's example in front of him, Neil did a much better job on
the Fairchild-Schlumberger system, and once their unit was on the
market, Graham never sold another machine, and ended up closing down
Lintech in 1988, and coming to work at Cambridge Instruments as
Technical Director (and my boss), where we built a rather better
machine than Schlumberger's, which got canned after we'd got it to the
stage of a fully working prototype, in part because Graham had
resigned.
Interesting story, containing many libellous details only availalbe by
e-mail.
Yes., a LAB6 source isn't bright enough for this. We used a TEM in the
released product.
We were looking at a hot field emission source, and second column for
ion-milling and tungsten deposition, when the EBT2000 project got
canned.
The EBT2000 had a digital data acquisition system which allowd us to
sample stroboscopicly at close to 12MHz (it should have been 25MHz)
independent of the repetition rate of the waveform we were looking at
- which gave the LaB6 source a rather higher effective brightness than
it had in the then competing machines.