Connect with us

generic snubber

Discussion in 'Electronic Design' started by Jenalee K., Jun 8, 2006.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Jenalee K.

    Jenalee K. Guest


    I am working on a generic card with some relays on it that have to
    switch loads up to 1000VA. The loads can be anything from resistive to
    reactive so I wanted to put somekind of generic snubber circuit on the
    card for each relay. What would be good component values for such a
    snubber? What about 47 ohms in series with 100n? (Values I saw in an
    example somewhere.) And what about the voltage and power requirements
    for these components? How do you actually calculate a snubber?

    Jenalee K
  2. The way I calculate an approximate value for a snubber is to choose a
    resistor which will limit the surge voltage to an acceptable value, and a
    capacitor which will store the energy of the inductive component. For
    example, a 120 VAC relay coil that draws 100 mA is about 3.2 H, and has a
    stored peak energy of 0.016 J. Choose the resistor to limit the voltage to
    200 volts at 0.14 A (peak), or 1.4 k, and the capacitor for the energy
    would be 0.8 uF. The snubber in normal operation will draw about 36 mA, so
    the resistor will dissipate about 2 watts. You can use smaller values of
    resistance and capacitance. I have found about 100 ohms and 0.1 uF to work

    Another way to look at it: For your 1000 VA loads, assuming 120 VAC at 8
    amps, it could be a pure inductive load of 40 mH with a peak energy of 2.9
    J at 12 amps. The 47 ohms in your example would limit the voltage to a
    reasonable 564 volts peak. This corresponds to 6.8 kW, so with 2.9
    Watt-Seconds it would dissipate within 428 uSec. The capacitance
    corresponding to this TC is 9 uF. Based on stored energy, it would be about
    18 uF at 600 V. The current draw for 18 uF would be 145 mA and the resistor
    would dissipate about 1 watt.

    I'm not sure my calculations are correct, especially for the capacitance
    value. I have seen snubber calculations for SCRs, but they are used to
    limit dV/dT. It may be useful to do a simulation for this. There is also
    the question of placing the snubber across the switching device (as in the
    case for the SCR), or the inductive load (as for the relay coil). I am
    interested in more details on this because I deal with inductive load
    switching quite often in circuit breaker test sets, which may involve over
    500 amperes at 480 VAC for the SCR and transformer primary, and 50,000
    amperes at 5 VAC being interrupted by a breaker. We use an SCR snubber of
    40 ohms and 0.0033 uF, and it works well enough. It is mostly to keep the
    SCRs from turning on when power is first applied to the circuit. We cannot
    tolerate much higher values of capacitance because the leakage current
    translates to unacceptably high output currents.

    We are using a snubber of 1 ohm and 30 uF at 600 VAC across the output of a
    tap switch that selects 9 voltages from 0 to 540 VAC, and then controlled
    by an SCR. Before adding the snubber, the SCR would sometimes turn on from
    dV/dT at higher voltage taps. The snubber tends to hold the voltage at the
    input of the SCR to its value prior to tap changing, and also limits the
    dV/dT. It draws up to about 6 amperes, and the resistor dissipates 36
    watts, but this is acceptable in a 50 kVA test set.

    I will post this response as is, at the risk of criticism. I will
    investigate the details and also await any corrections and discussion you
    may be able to supply.


    Paul E. Schoen
  3. I did some simulation using Tina, and the snubber values I calculated seem
    to be fairly reasonable. On the 1000 VA inductive load, the 47 ohm 18 uF
    combination produces a quickly damped spike of less than 1 kV, while with
    0.1 uF there can be 8 kV spikes. The worst condition is if the load is
    switched off at its peak current. For very pure inductances, this peak
    current can be 2.8 times the normal RMS current if the AC is initially
    applied at a voltage zero crossing. This illustrates why a zero-crossing
    triac is the worst way to switch an inductive load.

    The snubber also works by placing it across the switch. However, this
    requires a very low impedance source, as it will see the inductive spike

    A reasonable snubber would probably be 100 ohms and 470 nF, although the
    capacitor could see a 2.5 kV spike. Real world conditions are difficult to
    simulate. Actually, much of the energy stored in the inductance will be
    dissipated in the initial arcing of the opening contacts. A solid state
    device like a triac will continue to conduct until current reaches a low
    value, so snubbing will not need to be as robust. However, the devices are
    more fragile, so the energy must be absorbed without high voltage


  4. Assuming you are referring to 18uF in series with a 47 ohm resistance, at
    120V 60Hz, you might want to repunch those numbers...
  5. Right. About 814 mA and power of 31 watts. A 3.3 uF capacitor would draw
    about 145 mA, and it also makes an effective snubber without excessive
    power, although a 1 kV spike could be generated compared to 500 V for the
    18 uF.

    A higher value of resistance can be used to reduce the voltage spike on the
    capacitor at the expense of a higher overall spike voltage on the load. 150
    ohms with 3.3 uF limits the capacitor voltage to 600 volts, while the spike
    reaches 1.5 kV. The resistor will dissipate about 3.5 watts.

    This is a useful exercise, and simulation clearly shows ringing and DC
    current offsets due to inductance.


  6. Jenalee K.

    Jenalee K. Guest

    Thanks Paul for your excellent explanation. I am afraid however that I
    am not able to supply much discussion nor corrections, sorry. All I
    know is that probable loads are 120VAC/240VAC/24VDC power supplies.

    Jenalee K
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day