In this case the scope or to be more exact parts of it would be the
semi-fed cat.
FTL communications implies that information got to the scope before a beam
of light could have. You do not know the true state of the scope until
you look at it. This is when you make the "measurement" of the state of
the scope.
---
I don't see why when the scope gets its trigger matters. Think about
the experiment this way:
The two fastest runners on earth, Racer A and Racer B, are equally
matched, consistent, and always run the same distance in the same
time. Now, for the sake of an experiment, Racer B is forced to wear
running shoes which weigh one ounce more than Racer A's. As a result
of that, Racer A crosses the finish line before Racer B, starting a
clock which stops when Racer B crosses the finish line, and the clock
_always_ reads 100ms when it stops, no matter how many races are run.
Now, to determine whether it's possible for Runner A to run faster
than his "limit", he's given a substantial hit of speed and the race
run again. This time, at the end of the race, the clock reads one
second. Knowing that good old, dependable, Runner B ran the race as
he always had before leads to the conclusion that Runner A ran faster
than he normally would have.
Notice that the clock didn't care about how fast Runner A was going or
how long it took it to get to the finish line, all it did was record
the difference in time it took for the two runners to cross the finish
line.
But, just to keep everybody happy, and since we don't really know how
the speed is going to affect Runner A, what we do is set up a
concurrently running second experiment which measures the time it
takes for Racer B to run the race and use that to make sure that the
larger than normal time difference at the finish line wasn't due to
Runner B going more slowly than he had before. We could, of course,
also attempt to directly measure the time it took Runner A to run the
race, but we save that for a later experiment since we can derive it
from the results of the two we ran.
---
The trouble is that you actually make that measurement after light could
have gotten there. You assume that things are working like they always do
and that the scope doesn't suddenly change its story about the past. This
is reasonable under the current view of QM.
---
The scope doesn't care about the past; all it's doing is getting
triggered by an event.
---
FTL communications, however, can be troublesome for the current view. The
current view doesn't rule out the semi-fed cat. The semi-fed cat is just
too weird and, it was discovered, not needed to make the predictions come
out right. If it is discovered that somehow the scope seems to be
changing its story, a fault in QM and not the FTL communications is
proven.
If matters a whole bunch. "C" is the top speed of communications in the
universe.
---
We don't know that for sure, it's just that _we_ can't seem to find
anything going faster because _we're_ bound, so far, by what we don't
know.
---
It just happens that light goes that fast.
---
Only as the limit allowed in a vacuum, and it varies just like
everything else does depending on the density of the medium it's
traversing.
---
Other types of
communication also have "C" as an upper limit.
---
_Any_ types of communication, so far.
---
"c" on the otherhand
depends on the medium. It may even be that somethings still work at "C"
through the medium that slows light.
---
Assuming that things which work at C can't go slower than C, then it
seems reasonable to assume that the "slowing" isn't a slowing at all,
but the extra time required for the thing to bounce around in the
medium before it finally comes out.
---
I find FTL communications about as troubling as semi-fed cats.
Entanglement may or may not provide a means to do FTL. So far, no-one I
know of have communicated any information via it. If they do, I will find
Entanglement troubling.
---
I'd find it exhilarating!
Just imagine, a crack in the door that's been closed to us since the
beginning of time!
Ultimately, the elimination of one of the barriers that keeps us from
going to the stars...