Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Failed Electro

T

terryc

Jan 1, 1970
0
That's not what I said and its also quite untrue. The papers the IPCC
survey and report on are peer-reviewed before they get into the
published literature, and the IPCC's reporting process shows up
conflicting conclusions (which is the second string of the scientific
quality control process).

Wasn't that the point of the hockey curve papers, i.e they had not been
peer-reviewed, but merely published and published with a very murky
history.
 
T

terryc

Jan 1, 1970
0
This doesn't mean that one discards every paper ever published as
unreliable - the bulk of the published papers on anthropogenic global
warming form a coherent and self-consistent mass of evidence
supporting the hypothesis.

If that self-consistent mass is based on a popular vote, then it isn't
science.
Graham doesn't know enough about science to understand this,

Or isn't indoctrinated enough?

Lets face it, when the pope said that the sun revolved around the earth,
jst about every contemporary "scientist" agreed that this was true.
What is different now?
 
T

Tim Williams

Jan 1, 1970
0
Of course it is good, but mind-rippingly good, insanely priced,
perfect-out-the-door good?

Amazing, isn't it? Can you think back, way back, I know it's a stretch,
back when you were doing electronics, what your impressions were of your
first Tektronix 475? One of the best instruments ever, perfectly good off
the shelf, and worth a bundle, brand new.

Tim
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
There's no control of any sort on what he [Larkin] posts here.

Bill wants Usenet posts ISO9000 approved ?

Has he actually developed a sense of humour or is it increasing total madness ?

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
terryc said:
Wasn't that the point of the hockey curve papers, i.e they had not been
peer-reviewed, but merely published and published with a very murky
history.

Steve McIntyre was peer reviewing Mann's work. I think he smelt a rat and
that's why he asked for the raw data which he was refused using dubious
excuses relating to copyright issues.
http://www.climateaudit.org/?page_id=354

Somewhere there you'll find the whole story.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
John said:
You ill-mannered, useless old fart. You don't work at all.

Well there is that to be borne in mind of course. Talk is cheap when you don't
need to back up anything of your own.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
John Larkin wrote.


Much as I'd like to.

But you DON'T. I'm beginning to wonder now if your job applications have failed
not because of your age but your attitude.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Rich said:
you don't sign off on the component or subassembly until you can
_demonstrate_ that it meets or exceeds the spec.

Ah yes. Signing off ! That says it all. Been asked to do that more than a few
times. No disasters so far !

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
James said:
I've seen John's gear. It's good.

I can well believe it. Mine is somewhat simpler but I take equal pride in delivering
a good product.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
I do seem to be free of certain delusions Americans have about the
perfection of their electoral system and their health care systems;

And the connection here with electronics is .......... ???

Have you heard of the use of OT: ?

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Tim said:
Amazing, isn't it? Can you think back, way back, I know it's a stretch,
back when you were doing electronics, what your impressions were of your
first Tektronix 475? One of the best instruments ever, perfectly good off
the shelf, and worth a bundle, brand new.

I need to reclaim one of those (or is it a 465B ?) from a client I left it
with.

Super kit.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Some residual contact with reality? I'm not less scpetical about John
Larkin's fantasies tha I am about yours?

The only one with fantasies (and they are getting increasingly extreme) is YOU !

You NEED a psychiatrist. Very seriously before you fall off the edge.

Gragan
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Even so, the evidence suggests that nobody gets everything right, every time.

I (the company) sold a prototype to a client. We replaced it with a production
model about a year later but let them keep the original which they still have as
it was the first pro-mixer the venue had ever bought.

Graham
 
E

Eeyore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Possibly. But I've got a long way to go before I'm as detached as the
average psychiatrist, let alone you or Jim Thompson, and I'd have to
be much further out of touch with reality than I am now to be silly
enough to consider taking your advice.

SEEK TREATMENT NOW !

It's free over there isn't it ? Show the shrink your posts in the various
threads you've been involved in recently.

Graham
 
R

Rich Grise

Jan 1, 1970
0
Amazing, isn't it? Can you think back, way back, I know it's a stretch,
back when you were doing electronics, what your impressions were of your
first Tektronix 475? One of the best instruments ever, perfectly good off
the shelf, and worth a bundle, brand new.

Why are you attributing a John Larkin quote to bill.sloman?

Thanks,
Rich
 
R

Rich Grise

Jan 1, 1970
0
But you DON'T. I'm beginning to wonder now if your job applications have failed
not because of your age but your attitude.

I have a sister who is basically a psycho bitch from hell. She can't hold
a job, and of course it's always because everybody else at the company is
an asshole.

When people ask her, "So, what's the common element in all of these jobs?"
she gets hostile.

Those people are better left to their own devices, I believe.

Cheers!
Rich
 
R

Rich Grise

Jan 1, 1970
0
OOpps!!

The most reliable sign of sanity is doing the same thing while expecting ^
in
different results.

Cheers!
Rich
 
Top