Maker Pro
Maker Pro

ESR Meter MK-II

W

Wayne Tiffany

Jan 1, 1970
0
I just wanted to share my recent experience with building the ESR meter,
batch number 7214211 for anyone interested. I ordered from John's Jukes
Ltd. and was told to expect it in a week or so. Heck with that - I got it
in 3 days! So, that weekend I started on it. I had already read all the
instructions before starting (I know, one of those...) so the start of
assembling was easy - unpack things into a small tray and have at it. Not
knowing for sure what I was going to receive, I had printed out the
downloaded instructions in color to pre-study and assist me. Keep in mind
that these are only comments to help Bob & others, not complaints - I am
well pleased with the kit and the meter.

1. The kit came with a set of printed instructions in black and white and I
found my color ones to be a handy reference for verification.

2. The kit also came with a page with 2 corrections. It would be nice for
Bob to get the internet copies updated.

3. Page 9 is missing the identification of figure 7. I was trying to do
this project slowly & carefully and it took a bit to find it and make sure I
understood the point.

4. I chose to put longer wires on the switch & posts so I could separate
the front panel from the circuit board. User preference.

5. I wasn't able to bend the battery holder tab on the large one far enough
to directly solder it to the smaller one per the instructions. I had to
join them with a short piece of wire. Not a problem.

6. The annotation on Fig. 13 for the tape that holds the battery holders is
mis-spelled in that it's missing an "l". Then you could also go to the
point that all tape has 2 sides... :)

7. I found that the schematic called for D3 & D4 to be 1N4002, when in fact
the supplied ones were 1N4004. Fig 9a & the parts list show them as 1N4004.

8. For me the easiest way to install the components was to pick a resistor,
bend all of that value, and then install them. That way it was a double
check right then as to whether or not I had found them all. When I got down
to the last two resistors, I hunted all over the board to find a home for
them. Upon not finding them, I finally went back to the Parts List and saw
that they were only for calibration and didn't have a home. Guess I didn't
*completely* read the instructions. :-(

9. I only used about 10% of the included solder. It was certainly more
than plenty, but better than running out.

10. The silk screening verbiage didn't exactly match the diagrams, but it
wasn't a problem.

Bottom line is that all the parts were there and in good condition. I was
able to assemble the kit, run the diagnostics (all ok), and use it without
having to ask anyone anything. Good job guys! Bob, consider this my
returned Quality Control Card.

WT
 
J

JURB6006

Jan 1, 1970
0
the supplied ones were 1N4004.

1N4001 through 4007 are the same family of diodes with 4007 having the highest
ratings. You can always use a higher number within that range.

In a way you could consider it a free upgrade.

JURB
 
W

Wayne Tiffany

Jan 1, 1970
0
That was my conclusion also. Thanks for the confirmation.

WT
 
D

david

Jan 1, 1970
0
4. I chose to put longer wires on the switch & posts so I could separate
the front panel from the circuit board. User preference.
Bottom line is that all the parts were there and in good condition. I was
able to assemble the kit, run the diagnostics (all ok), and use it without
having to ask anyone anything. Good job guys! Bob, consider this my
returned Quality Control Card.

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~bobpar/esrmeter.htm

I just built one of them found it a great kit, but I just had to mod it by
drilling holes under the pots so they can be adjusted
without removing front panel. I did then have to reroute a track with a
resistor leg :)

my 2cents worth

David
 
B

Bob Parker

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi Wayne and everyone,
I've sent all your comments to the people in the Dick Smith
Electronics Kit Department, to refer to next time they update their
kit notes.
I'm also trying to get hold of the corrections so I can put them on
my website.
Thanks for taking the time to write down all your experiences and
thoughts. I hope you find lots of defective caps with your new meter.
:)

Regards,
Bob
 
Top