You don't pay much attention, do you. There are things that I knew
that turned out not be so, and some of them get exposed here.
It doesn't happen all that often, but it has certainly happened.
It varies. I'm damned if can remember who did it most recently - I had
an idea that it was Tim Williams but the search engine doesn't throw
up anything.
It seems to have been Phil Hobbs in the thread "LTC Switcher CAD3 ?"
on the 4th June.
I was talking about nanohenries per root turn, which is a mistake I'd
been making for years, and I didn't immediately realise that Phil was
right when he told me that it should have been Henries per turn
squared. It was three in the morning, my time, and I should have gone
to bed rather than responding without thinking hard enough about what
I was posting.
It was embarrassingly obvious that he was right when I looked at the
thread the following morning, and I did post an acknowledgement
immediately.
You should have remembered. You chimed in almost immediately, and - as
usual - said absolutely nothing that was interesting or useful.
