Connect with us

Early MOSFETs: why P-channel?

Discussion in 'General Electronics Discussion' started by MajorMajor, Jul 14, 2016.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. MajorMajor

    MajorMajor

    1
    0
    Jul 14, 2016
    One thing that has been baffling me in the last week or so: looking back in time when the first MOSFET input op-amps were introduced, I noticed that they used predominantly p-channel devices in the first stage. On a similar note, in the rare occasions when discrete small-signal MOSFETS were used (i.e. devices like the 3N163), again, there seems to be a leaning towards p-channel devices.

    Taking into account the fact that in general, p-channel MOSFETs have somewhat inferior characteristics, I was wondering why this was the case. Just about the only advantage of p-channel devices that I can think of is the lower 1/f noise (even then, it's hideous...) Was there something about the silicon process that made them preferable?

    Even with modern devices, such as the excellent LTC6240 op-amp, again, the input stage uses p-channel devices. So is there something in chip manufacturing that favours p-channel in the input stage?
     
  2. Bluejets

    Bluejets

    4,854
    1,017
    Oct 5, 2014
    Rixen and Harald Kapp like this.
  3. Harald Kapp

    Harald Kapp Moderator Moderator

    11,522
    2,654
    Nov 17, 2011
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-