Connect with us

discharging capacitor to ground

Discussion in 'Electronic Basics' started by Peter, May 22, 2004.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Peter

    Peter Guest

    Hi folks,

    I want to discharge a 1uF monolytic capacitor charged at 5V through a 2N3904
    (collector to cap, emitter to ground). The transistor driven into saturation
    to do that.
    It is not an oscillator, the cap is permanently charged through a 1K
    resistor to a 5V source.

    But should I add a limiting resistor (like 33 ohms) to limit peak current
    under 200mA? Or the limiting resistor is not needed because of capacitor
    internal resistance or transistor resistance?

    ThankS!
    -- Peter --
     
  2. John Larkin

    John Larkin Guest

    No need. The energy stored here is far too small to damage the
    transistor. Let it discharge as fast as the transistor can yank it
    down.

    John
     
  3. Jamie

    Jamie Guest

    yes, limit the current with a resistor.
    a cap can really generate some heavy
    current in very short periods.
    and some transistors can not handle that.
    they will actually blow/crack the case sometimes
    with hardly no heating due to the sudden current
    impact that can cause pressure expansion.
     
  4. Peter

    Peter Guest

    Good! I don't like adding unecessary components, even a single resistor ;)

    Thanks!
     
  5. As an exercise you might calculate the die temperature rise above
    ambient if the transistor dumps the cap and innediately turns off and
    repeats this process as fast as the 1k pull up resistor can recharge
    the capacitor. By the way, the instantaneous peak current is limited
    by the beta of the transistor times the base current. There are a few
    simplifications in doing this math.
     
  6. John Larkin

    John Larkin Guest


    Ballpark 5 milliwatts; not enough to worry about.

    John
     
  7. Well, if it were me, I would use a resistor to limit the current to the
    max specified of the transistor, which I think is around 1A peak. One
    always wants to be able to actually *do* the sums to ensure that the
    data sheet specs are met. Without doing this, all bets are off. V/0 is
    infinite. For example, a 2N3904 is not speced to be able to take, say,
    10A, so make *sure* that it is never in a situation that will cause this
    to occur. Its simply good design practise.

    Unless one has an absolutely overriding reason *not* to ensure that a
    transistor is within what is specked for the transistor, not doing the
    basic V/I calculations is pretty daft. It certainly gets one into the
    wrong mindset for doing reliable design in general, even if one can get
    away with cheating in a one off situation. If I was doing a design
    review/sign off on this, I would be demanding a worst case analysis that
    guaranteed that the transistor was indeed within its most *basic* of
    specs (V, I, Po), even if I were to let some of the others slip through
    for practical reasons (e.g. a 1u gate leakage spec, when it is really
    1pa).

    Kevin Aylward

    http://www.anasoft.co.uk
    SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
    Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
    Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
     
  8. John Larkin

    John Larkin Guest

    I figure that, if you can do a 10-second quick mental estimate of the
    situation, and it turns out to be orders of magnitude away from any
    sort of danger, then do it and move on to something more important.
    Save the serious math for when it really matters.

    12 microjoules dumped from 5 volts isn't going to hurt any transistor.
    And there's only 6.25 milliwatts available, max. You can do both those
    calcs in your head. That's what I would say at a design review.

    John
     
  9. It may help to put a coil with recistance next to zero in serie with the
    capacitor. I don't know how to calculate the lowest posible value (Henry)
    the coil must have in order to keep the peak current below the transistors
    maximum peak current limit.
     
  10. Well, the point of the resistor is to prevent doing any serious maths.
    Its the simplest way to ensure that it is within spec. If one needs to
    avoid the component, that's when a bit more work is required to see if
    one can cheat reliably.
    But if you can't guarantee that the transistor is within *all* rated
    specs, i.e. say < 1A in this case, you still have no recourse to the
    manufacture if they all start failing.

    I agree, that in this case its doubtful if there will be problems, but
    in general, transients into caps are an issue in transistor failures.

    Kevin Aylward

    http://www.anasoft.co.uk
    SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
    Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
    Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
     
  11. John Larkin

    John Larkin Guest

    I see people using huge caps - as, say, 1000 uF in 12-volt
    applications - as the timing caps on 555 thingies. That's scairy. 1000
    mikes charged to 8 volts is 32 mJ, enough to fire a spark plug.

    John
     
  12. Bill Bowden

    Bill Bowden Guest

    How do you drive the transistor into saturation, do you use
    a resistor on the base?

    If so, you might just recalculate the value of the base
    resistor so the HFE of the transistor limits the collector
    current. That way you can do it all with one resistor.

    -Bill
     
  13. Peter

    Peter Guest

    But the HFE can vary widely from one transistor to the next, even in the
    same batch. Can be anywhere between 75 and 300 or so, and the collector
    current further changes the HFe.
    Well! I could take the maximum HFE as a start, then be sure the energy
    stored can be dissipated by the junction in this short amount of time; as
    John said, it is quite small with 1uF. As long as there is no other hidden,
    hazardous phenomena for the transistor in the scenario of course.

    -- Peter --
     
  14. John Larkin

    John Larkin Guest

    The beta of a 2N3904 peaks at about 8 mA, and is dropping fast fast -
    down by about 10:1 - at 200 ma. So the peak current will sort of
    self-limit, given reasonable base drive. Not that it matters, with
    this low energy available.

    John
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-