Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Deflection amplifier design for DG7-32 CRT

P

Philip Pemberton

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi,
Having spent a few days playing around with Ohm's Law and splitting apart
and rebuilding the focus chain for my DG7-32 CRT, I've managed to finally get
a decent spot on the tube face. For those who don't know, the DG7-32 is a 7cm
round oscilloscope CRT with electrostatic deflection.

Now I'm having a problem with the deflection circuitry. Initially I used
the "OZ2CPU" deflection amp design from
<http://webx.dk/oz2cpu/clock-scope/scope.htm>. I've had a few problems with
that - not least of all its strange input signal requirements and the need
for a 400V deflection power supply. Can anyone tell me how to calculate the
gain of the circuit, or maybe even if there is a specific name for that style
of amplifier (so I can go looking for the info myself)?

I also found a similar circuit in Sascha Ittner's CRT clock project. When I
say "similar" I mean "same circuit, different resistor values, +250V HT
instead of +400V and +12V LT instead of +5V".

What I want to build is a deflection amplifier that will take a max. 2.5V
input. If the input is 0V, then the spot is deflected full left, 1.25V
centers the spot, and 2.5V moves the spot to the far right. Ideally I'd also
like to be able to tweak the X and Y gain (=size) and offset (=position).

I've got +240V available from the anode circuit; adding an additional +400V
PSU would involve adding another voltage doubler, and the one that's on there
now isn't exactly small.

Thanks.
--
Phil. | Acorn RiscPC600 SA220 64MB+6GB 100baseT
[email protected] | Athlon64 3200+ A8VDeluxe R2 512MB+100GB
http://www.philpem.me.uk/ | Panasonic CF-25 Mk.2 Toughbook
No software patents! <http://www.eff.org/> / <http://www.ffii.org/>
Wanted: Heisenberg. Reason uncertain.
 
J

John Popelish

Jan 1, 1970
0
Philip Pemberton wrote:
(snip)
Now I'm having a problem with the deflection circuitry. Initially I used
the "OZ2CPU" deflection amp design from
<http://webx.dk/oz2cpu/clock-scope/scope.htm>. I've had a few problems with
that - not least of all its strange input signal requirements and the need
for a 400V deflection power supply. Can anyone tell me how to calculate the
gain of the circuit, or maybe even if there is a specific name for that style
of amplifier (so I can go looking for the info myself)?

The amplifier is a differential amplifier otherwise known as a long
tailed pair. It accepts two inputs and amplifies the difference
between them and outputs two signals that are anti phase (one goes
positive when the other goes negative. This variable gain version has
the two emitters fed by some kind of current sources (just resistors,
in this case) but he gain setting is dominated by the resistor between
the emitters. The gain is related to the bias current passing through
the transistors, but if the emitter bridging resistor is high enough
to effectively linearize the amplifier, then the gain or one side is
approximately the collector resistance divided by the half the emitter
bridging resistance. This is another way of saying that the
differential gain between the two collectors is the collector
resistance divided by the emitter bridging resistance.

This kind of circuit is a lot easier to work with if there is a
negative supply below the range of input voltages the amplifier works
with. This allows the emitter current sources to pull down lower than
the inputs to keep the emitter current fairly constant even at the
lowest input voltage expected.

Is the 5 volt supply in your design made with a single winding and a
bridge rectifier, as shown for this supply, or did you use a center
tapped winding with two diodes? The second case makes it very easy to
come up with the negative bias needed to allow the input range to go
to zero volts. If it is not convenient to come up with a low voltage
negative supply, you can, alternatively, bias your deflection signals
positive so that ground is more negative than they are, to use
something like this design.
I also found a similar circuit in Sascha Ittner's CRT clock project. When I
say "similar" I mean "same circuit, different resistor values, +250V HT
instead of +400V and +12V LT instead of +5V".

The important thing for deflection is to have enough differential
swing between the two deflection plates, though the average voltage
will affect the focus. This is why you need two outputs. If you just
bias one plate with a constant voltage and swing the other, the focus
changes as the beam swings. The differential approach keeps the
average voltage on the two plates constant.

I doubt that many of the tubes listed need a 400 volt deflection
supply (~200 +- deflection voltage) to achieve the differential
voltage needed for full face deflection. But you can use a pair of
high resistance dividers across your 240 volt supply and a volt meter
to find out what kind of voltage difference is needed to deflect your
beam. You may be surprised how little difference voltage it takes.

For instance, if you make a string of, say, 10 each 100k 1/4 watt
resistors and move 4 clips from node to node (turn the power off and
let the DC decay before moving clips to prevent shock) to change the
tap voltages, you can adjust the tap voltages in 24 volt steps to
simulate the outputs of two differential deflection amplifiers. Start
with the clips all at mid setting to produce 4 plate voltages at
about 120 volts. You should still produce a dot near center. Adjust
pairs of these clips in opposite directions (with a volt meter
connected across the plates to measure the difference) and find out
about what voltage on each pair deflects the dot all the way to the
edge of the screen, each way. It is okay to have a one tap mismatch
between one side and the other, so you have a 24 volt step size.

This differential voltage requirement will allow you to find out what
gain you need to amplify your 1.25 +-1.25 volt deflection signal up to
full screen deflection voltage, and let you know whether a 240 volt
supply is sufficient to produce these voltages. I think this is worth
doing before you design the deflection amplifiers. Ideally you don't
want to have to swing the amplifier anywhere near full supply voltage
for full deflection, if you want low distortion.
What I want to build is a deflection amplifier that will take a max. 2.5V
input. If the input is 0V, then the spot is deflected full left, 1.25V
centers the spot, and 2.5V moves the spot to the far right. Ideally I'd also
like to be able to tweak the X and Y gain (=size) and offset (=position).

I've got +240V available from the anode circuit; adding an additional +400V
PSU would involve adding another voltage doubler, and the one that's on there
now isn't exactly small.

I am doubtful that you will need more than the 240 that is available,
but a test will prove this pretty quickly.
 
W

Winfield Hill

Jan 1, 1970
0
Philip Pemberton wrote...
Now I'm having a problem with the deflection circuitry. Initially
I used the "OZ2CPU" deflection amp design from
<http://webx.dk/oz2cpu/clock-scope/scope.htm>.
... Can anyone tell me how to calculate the gain of the circuit...

Did you realize P2 is an adjustable pot? The gain is the ratio
of the two load resistors to the emitter-to-emitter resistance,
G = 2 RL / RE, where 2 RL = R3 + R4, and RE = 2 re + R_P2. Here
re is the intrinsic emitter resistance of each transistor, which
is derived from the Eber-Moll formula and is re = 0.025-ohms/Ic.
In this circuit you're expected to start with a signal biased to
about 2.1V, and the pot P1 is adjusted to the same value plus any
small offset voltage resulting from different Vbe for Q1 and Q2.
We can estimate the emitter voltages are about 2.1 - 0.65 = 1.45V,
so the emitter currents are about 1.45/4.7k = 0.308mA. When this
current is dropped across the 220k collector resistor it creates
a 68V voltage drop (ignoring the small base current), which means
you'll see about 332V on each collector. That doesn't match the
300V value claimed by OZ2CPU on your weblink page, so perhaps he
does not have a signal at 2.1V, but a higher voltage, about 2.8V,
and his emitter currents would be about 0.6mA each. (You could
reduce the value of the emitter resistors.)

Now about the gain. With 0.6mA, re = 42 ohms. The maximum gain
is for R_P2 = 0, and is high, 220k/42 = 5200 (we're ignoring the
Early effect, which is small for high-voltage transistors). One
issue, if you set the gain that high, you'll have a nonlinear
amplifier, because r_e changes with current, changing the gain.
But when you use a sensible non-zero value of R_P2, say over 1k
for a gain of 440 or less, etc., R_P2's steady value swamps the
changing emitter-resistance and you'll get a linear output.
What I want to build is a deflection amplifier that will take a
max. 2.5V input. If the input is 0V, then the spot is deflected
full left, 1.25V centers the spot, and 2.5V moves the spot to the
far right. Ideally I'd also like to be able to tweak the X and Y
gain (=size) and offset (=position).

OK. But you'll need a negative supply voltage to create the two
current sinks for the differential transistors.

I've got +240V available from the anode circuit ...

How much defelection voltage does your tube require? And what
average DC value is appropriate for the deflectors? Perhaps you
can get by with the lower voltage.
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Philip Pemberton"
Hi,
Having spent a few days playing around with Ohm's Law and splitting apart
and rebuilding the focus chain for my DG7-32 CRT, I've managed to finally
get
a decent spot on the tube face. For those who don't know, the DG7-32 is a
7cm
round oscilloscope CRT with electrostatic deflection.


** You need a nice pair of 6GH8s to drive a DG7-32 CRT ;-)

As used in the 2MHz CRO I built from a published design in 1970, while a
high school student.

I still have it and it still works just fine.




.......... Phil
 
F

Fred Bloggs

Jan 1, 1970
0
What I want to build is a deflection amplifier that will take a max. 2.5V
input. If the input is 0V, then the spot is deflected full left, 1.25V
centers the spot, and 2.5V moves the spot to the far right. Ideally I'd also
like to be able to tweak the X and Y gain (=size) and offset (=position).

Interesting....maybe something like this:
View in a fixed-width font such as Courier.
 
F

Fred Bloggs

Jan 1, 1970
0
OOPS-
View in a fixed-width font such as Courier.
 
P

Philip Pemberton

Jan 1, 1970
0
In message <[email protected]>
Phil Allison said:
** You need a nice pair of 6GH8s to drive a DG7-32 CRT ;-)

Well, let's put it this way. I'm a transistor user. I have precisely no
knowledge of vacuum tube (valve) circuitry, and even getting the CRT working
was a pain in the ass.

I've finally got the deflection circuit working properly using R=4k7 from
Q1.E to Q2.E in the drive circuit. The 10k carbon film resistors in the Y
circuit are hopelessly out of spec, and in dire need of replacement with
some meatier (and more accurate) resistors though.

I've also added a simplistic astigmatism control - a 220k pot from +240V to
GND, with a 100k resistor in the ground path. Careful tweaking can get the
spot size down to less than 0.5mm - even better resolution than my Tek 466.
Then again, comparing a storage CRT to a normal CRT is a bit like comparing
apples to oranges...
As used in the 2MHz CRO I built from a published design in 1970, while a
high school student.
I still have it and it still works just fine.

Heh, 2MHz out of a DG7-32. Nice. I didn't know the deflectors could go that
fast. Guess it will make a nice vector display testbed. I wonder if Asteroids
will run properly on it... :D

Later.
--
Phil. | Acorn RiscPC600 SA220 64MB+6GB 100baseT
[email protected] | Athlon64 3200+ A8VDeluxe R2 512MB+100GB
http://www.philpem.me.uk/ | Panasonic CF-25 Mk.2 Toughbook
No software patents! <http://www.eff.org/> / <http://www.ffii.org/>
.... The universe is laughing behind your back
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"Philip Pemberton"
"Phil Allison"
Well, let's put it this way. I'm a transistor user. I have precisely no
knowledge of vacuum tube (valve) circuitry, and even getting the CRT
working
was a pain in the ass.


** You gotta learn to love 'em.

I've also added a simplistic astigmatism control - a 220k pot from +240V
to
GND, with a 100k resistor in the ground path. Careful tweaking can get the
spot size down to less than 0.5mm - even better resolution than my Tek
466.
Then again, comparing a storage CRT to a normal CRT is a bit like
comparing
apples to oranges...


** Yes - a basic ES deflection CRT display is * amazingly * sharp.

The fancy PDA and screen storage ones are relatively blurry.

LCD is unspeakable .......


Heh, 2MHz out of a DG7-32. Nice. I didn't know the deflectors could go
that
fast. Guess it will make a nice vector display testbed. I wonder if
Asteroids
will run properly on it... :D


** In 70, I connected the vertical and horizontal amps of my new CRO the
deflection ccts of a B&W TV set to get a 625 line raster, then coupled the
video signal to the Z (intensity) input and wound up with a viewable
bright green pix.

Way cool, back then !!!



........... Phil
 
F

Fred Bloggs

Jan 1, 1970
0
Filling in the blanks- and using a single supply oa:
View in a fixed-width font such as Courier.
 
Q

quietguy

Jan 1, 1970
0
Great minds think alike - I did that too and it was great showing the kids the
pic on that little 3inch screen

David
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"quietguy"
Phil Allison


Great minds think alike - I did that too and it was great showing the kids
the
pic on that little 3inch screen


** Early TV sets all used ES deflection, same as a CRO.

They avoided the need to generate many watts of power to drive the H and V
coils of a yoke AND the need to generate circa 20 kV EHT and thereby
avoided nearly all the reliability problems that still plague TV sets ands
monitors .




......... Phil
 
P

Philip Pemberton

Jan 1, 1970
0
In message <[email protected]>
Phil Allison said:
** In 70, I connected the vertical and horizontal amps of my new CRO the
deflection ccts of a B&W TV set to get a 625 line raster, then coupled the
video signal to the Z (intensity) input and wound up with a viewable
bright green pix.

Heh, now that would be cool.
The big problem is sorting out some form of Z-axis amplifier - working out
how much I need to pull down G1 to visibly dim the spot, then figure out how
much gain I need to design in to convert a 0V/2.5V signal into the right pull
down. "Fun with single-transistor amplifiers" :)

At the moment all I've got is a digital on/off control for the Z axis
(pilfered from the "Sascha Ittner" CRT clock design). Kinda useless for
analogue control of the brightness. Or maybe I should try pulling UP the
cathode instead.. might work better.

At the moment I'm trying to find some way of triggering a xenon strobe tube
without using an SCR or triac. I've got some MOC3023s but they don't trigger
reliably. I would use an SCR or triac driver with gate wired to the 3023, but
I don't have any spare SCRs or triacs :(

Later.
--
Phil. | Acorn RiscPC600 SA220 64MB+6GB 100baseT
[email protected] | Athlon64 3200+ A8VDeluxe R2 512MB+100GB
http://www.philpem.me.uk/ | Panasonic CF-25 Mk.2 Toughbook
No software patents! <http://www.eff.org/> / <http://www.ffii.org/>
.... Happiness: a perfume you can't give away without getting some yourself.
 
Top