Robert said:
It's sentences like this that make your problem a bit hard to
understand.
Well now you have my curiosity. What's wrong with the sentence?
Any DSP is a "lock-in amplifier chip."
Thanks, but I thought there would be a demand for a completed lock-in
amplifier chip. DSP chips are nice but that seems a little over kill
for a lock-in amplifier since the DSP has to be programmed. I mean,
it's an entire cpu system, right? A lock-in amplifier just doesn't
seem that complicated to me. Anyway, no big deal!
When I suggested to use a "commercial" lock-in amp, I meant just that:
the ready-made unit as can be bought or borrowed or stolen,
whatever you prefer.
Lock-in measurements are a bit finicky at times, which makes it
nice to have a commercial amp with its host of tuneable
parameters, even if what you actually need is a lot simpler.
You mean box unit, not a chip right? I understand that anything can be
made as complex as you want. Take a function generator. There are
plenty of chips that have onboard adjustable sine wave oscillators,
even square and triangle waves. Yet you also purchase an entire
generator that does the same thing. I'm looking at a Heathkit Function
Generator IG-1271. Hey, it's old so don't laugh. It has a frequency
knob from 1 - 10. It has a frequency multiplier fro 1 to 100K. It has
an attenuation switch (dB)-- 50, 40, 30, 20, 10, and 0. And an output
connector. That's it! Although I can buy a single chip that's
probably 10 times better as far as frequency range, but it doesn't have
the fancy knobs, and perhaps the 6 attenuation levels. Now isn't there
a demand for lock-in phase amplifiers? Please tell me what I'm
missing. Don't I need a mixer, sine wave signal, and a low pass
filter? I am curious what you mean by finicky. Maybe I need a really
good stable sine wave source.
Thanks for the info,
Paul