Maker Pro
Maker Pro

DC Wave Questions

T

Tom MacIntyre

Jan 1, 1970
0
Oh boy... now it appears we got a misogynist on our hands here.
You're an easy read, John boy.


Hmmm...I often wondered if there was a parallel word for mysogynist, a
female who hates males because they are male. Is there such a word?

Tom
 
O

operator jay

Jan 1, 1970
0
Tom MacIntyre said:
Hmmm...I often wondered if there was a parallel word for mysogynist, a
female who hates males because they are male. Is there such a word?

Tom


"Woman" (just kidding)
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
---
Had you bothered to get off of your fat, lazy ass and checked the
origin of the thread you might have discovered that it started on sed
where the OP asked for a five minute timer.

Since sed is a text-only newsgroup I advised the OP that I'd have a
solution for him which I'd post to abse, (where binaries are allowed
to be posted) then when I posted, I used the same subject as in sed in
order to keep some continuity, but indicated that the _thread_ came
from sed. Not the _post_, pinhead, the thread. The clue should have
been that since the post had a binary attached to it, it _couldn't_
have come from sed


339 posts so far (including this one) and zero content... just the
usual infantile squabbling.

John
 
J

John Larkin

Jan 1, 1970
0
This type of discussion is pointless and harmful. I've known brilliant
people, some at Bell Labs, who had difficulty spelling. Some Engineers and
Scientists had excellent command of the language (both English and
English!), but weren't as "swift" as the ones with language usage or
spelling problems. It's the luck of the draw either way.

It's quite difficult sometimes, but lets all try to be a bit nicer.

Awaiting flames.....

Don


Some people can't spell, and some people can't be nice. Luck of the
draw, as you point out.

Too bad newsreaders don't include a nice-checker. The simplest
implementation would just be a reverse spell-checker, that deleted
words like asshole and idiot and churl. Some people's posts would get
a *lot* shorter.


John
 
J

John Fields

Jan 1, 1970
0
Some people can't spell, and some people can't be nice. Luck of the
draw, as you point out.

Too bad newsreaders don't include a nice-checker. The simplest
implementation would just be a reverse spell-checker, that deleted
words like asshole and idiot and churl. Some people's posts would get
a *lot* shorter.

---
But a lot more confusing. Yours would read like this:

"Too bad newsreaders don't include a nice-checker. The simplest
implementation would just be a reverse spell-checker, that deleted
words like and and. Some people's posts would get
a *lot* shorter." ;)
 
T

TokaMundo

Jan 1, 1970
0
You mean likening you to a thoroughly disgusting, spoiled, female
brat?

Men who hate men that hate women should come find your lame ass.

You are a mere misogynistic bastard, at best.

You strike one as a jerk that fucked up a marriage, and blames it on
the woman, and women in general. You are a sad case, dipshit.
 
T

TokaMundo

Jan 1, 1970
0
Grow the **** up, retard.
Rather that concern yourself with the big words, you ought to make
sure you get the little ones right first. See above.

Note that you STILL likely don't know the meaning of the word cited.

I rest my case. The misogynistic idiot just got trivial... again.
Oh... that's right, he never was anything BUT trivial.
 
T

TokaMundo

Jan 1, 1970
0
339 posts so far (including this one) and zero content... just the
usual infantile squabbling.

John

And to think that it all started, because the John misogynistic
idiot tried to play spell checker... again.

I did post on topic in this thread, btw...
 
M

Michael A. Terrell

Jan 1, 1970
0
John said:
---
But a lot more confusing. Yours would read like this:

"Too bad newsreaders don't include a nice-checker. The simplest
implementation would just be a reverse spell-checker, that deleted
words like and and. Some people's posts would get
a *lot* shorter." ;)

It could just replace the missing words with an equal number of
underscores so you can fill in the blanks. ;-)
 
T

TokaMundo

Jan 1, 1970
0
But a lot more confusing. Yours would read like this:

"Too bad newsreaders don't include a nice-checker. The simplest
implementation would just be a reverse spell-checker, that deleted
words like and and. Some people's posts would get
a *lot* shorter." ;)

You could be a bit more retarded, but I do not see how.
 
S

Spehro Pefhany

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hmmm...I often wondered if there was a parallel word for mysogynist, a
female who hates males because they are male. Is there such a word?

Tom

Not a common word, but there is "misandrist".


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
 
J

John Fields

Jan 1, 1970
0
Grow the **** up, retard.


Note that you STILL likely don't know the meaning of the word cited.

---
Well, since I know the meanings of _all_ of the words in your little
diatribe, the likelihood of your being right is vanishingly small.

Also, even though you wrote it, you obviously don't know the meaning
of _cite_, since you didn't. LOL, the more you write the farther your
foot goes down your throat!
---
I rest my case. The misogynistic idiot just got trivial... again.
Oh... that's right, he never was anything BUT trivial.

---
Even though my arguments may seem to be trivial, arguing against your
badly thought out and clumsily written (I notice you finally fixed the
"myso" error) trash is actually quite difficult in that you need to be
apprised of your fox paws and errors, but in a way which won't strain
your brain cell beyond its elastic limit and leave you permanently
flaccid. The difficulty lies in that in order to reach you
intellectually I have to become Escherichia coli - like in my
responses and that _does_ exact a toll while I'm in that mode. I'm
sure you've felt something akin to that when trying to rise above your
quiescent e.coliness in order to try to respond to a post which I
couldn't quite get down to your level, but Hey!, every man's reach
should exceed his grasp, no? Oh, but wait... That should be "every
person's..." in order to satisfy your need to be PC re. your gyn
problem, no?

And, what's that "I rest my case" crap? Something you heard shortly
before being led out of the courtroom in chains?
 
T

Tom MacIntyre

Jan 1, 1970
0
You could be a bit more retarded, but I do not see how.

Actually, he was being a bit clever, but you choose to criticize
anyway, just because it's him posting, I have to assume.

Tom
 
T

TokaMundo

Jan 1, 1970
0
Typical of your type of coward.

Your powers of assessment are as retarded and fucked up as your
misogynistic bullshit remarks.
When one of you lot runs out of steam
he starts advocating physical retaliation when he knows he's been
bested intellectually and has nowhere else to go.
Your lame ass couldn't best a fresh turd.
My dear wife would disagree with you and, more than likely, give you a
good talking to and send you on your way with your tail between your
legs for intimating such a thing.

As if her old fart twit **** ass could order anyone around.
She has to be at least twice as fucking stupid as you are.
Does she know that you are a misogynistic fucktard?
So, on your way, Lassie.

As if your old twit **** ass could order anyone around.
 
T

TokaMundo

Jan 1, 1970
0
Even though my arguments may seem to be trivial, arguing against your
badly thought out and clumsily written (I notice you finally fixed the
"myso" error)


What "myso" error? You are wrong again, asswipe.
 
T

Tom MacIntyre

Jan 1, 1970
0
Actually, he was being a bit clever, but you choose to criticize
anyway, just because it's him posting, I have to assume.

Tom

BTW...I did mean for that to be choose (present tense), not chose
(past tense). :)

Tom
 
T

TokaMundo

Jan 1, 1970
0
Even though my arguments may seem to be trivial, arguing against your
badly thought out and clumsily written (I notice you finally fixed the
"myso" error) trash is actually quite difficult in that you need to be
apprised of your fox paws and errors, but in a way which won't strain
your brain cell beyond its elastic limit and leave you permanently
flaccid. The difficulty lies in that in order to reach you
intellectually I have to become Escherichia coli - like in my
responses and that _does_ exact a toll while I'm in that mode. I'm
sure you've felt something akin to that when trying to rise above your
quiescent e.coliness in order to try to respond to a post which I
couldn't quite get down to your level, but Hey!, every man's reach
should exceed his grasp, no? Oh, but wait... That should be "every
person's..." in order to satisfy your need to be PC re. your gyn
problem, no?

You are an idiot. You jump on others for spelling like a wussified
little school marm, yet you choose to not spell several of your
written "words". You are a true idiot, and I caught you. That is
about all there is to it.
And, what's that "I rest my case" crap?

Unfamiliar with everyday colloquialisms now as well?
I am not surprised.
Something you heard shortly
before being led out of the courtroom in chains?

Wrong again, asswipe. **** off and die now, little boy.
You are proof that numerical age does not a man make.
 
Top