Connect with us

Correct way to drive a pulsed LED

Discussion in 'Electronic Basics' started by logjam, Jan 5, 2006.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. logjam

    logjam Guest

    All right... I'm starting a new topic because I think some of you
    might not be taking me seriously anymore... ;)

    I have a setup that is giving a 500us pulse to an LED every 15ms.

    I don't remember the LED being so dimm when driven this way. I'm trying
    squeeze every bit of brightness out of it.

    I have HP LEDs, part number HLMP-3507, Bin F, Color 5.

    The data sheet can be found here:

    http://www.avagotech.com/products/p...Id=H0,C1,C5231,C4941,C4970,C5081,C5419,P91240

    I'm not sure how to understand Figure 15, which sets limits for pulsed
    operation

    When running the LED off of a 100ohm resistor with a 12v supply I get a
    6v voltage drop as seen on a scope. This would seem to indicate 60ma
    for 500us. I'd really like to get it up to 120ma if possible, but the
    data sheet says 90ma?

    Any ideas???

    Thanks,
    Grant
     
  2. That duty cycle means that the LED is on only
    (500*10^-6)/(15*10^-3)=0.033 or 3.3% of the time, so it appears to be
    about 3.3% as bright if it were powered at the same level, continuously.
    Find a way to increase the duty cycle.

    All diodes have some resistive losses, in addition to the junction
    drop. When you pulse the current, the instantaneous resistive losses
    go up proportional to the square of the peak current. That heat must
    then diffuse out of the places where the resistance occurs to the
    whole thermal mass of the device and then to the air while the peak
    temperature at the resistive spots stays below the threshold of
    damage. LEDs that are designed for low duty cycle operation have had
    the series resistance lowered as much as is practical (double wire
    bonds, thicker metalization on the die, etc.), and thus, have higher
    peak current capability. These changes often increase the price.

    That said, the 90 mA peak current spec is time limited according to
    the repetition rate. On page 5 of the data sheet:
    http://www.avagotech.com/pc/downloadDocument.do?id=4290
    there is a graph of how long a pulse can last at the peak value for
    various repetition rates. There is a line for 100Hz (10 ms period),
    so your 66 Hz line would be just to the right of that. This line
    tells you that your pulses can last about 2000 to 3000 us at the full
    peak current rating if they are repeated every 15 ms. The LEDs
    designed for low duty cycle operation will show a curve that sweeps up
    much higher for short pulses, instead of leveling off at a fixed value
    (of 3 times the DC current rating), like these curves do.

    So extending the on time to 2000us out of every 15ms would increase
    the average light output by about 4 times (about 2 visible steps in
    apparent brightness) what you are getting with 500 us pulses, at the
    same current.
     
  3. logjam

    logjam Guest

    All right, I will do some more tests tonight.

    I did do experimenting with duty cycle last night.

    1/33th vs 1/22th vs 1/11th. All with 100 ohn resistors I could barely
    tell the difference between 1/22 and 1/11. There was a noticeable
    difference between the 1/22 / 1/11 and the 1/33. With a 25ohm resistor
    on the 1/33 led it looked as bright as the 1/22 and 1/11. The 1/22 and
    1/11 looked VERY close.

    So no matter what duty cycle, I shouldn't drive the LED with more than
    90ma? The maximum pulsed value on the datasheet?

    My display is organized in characters of 8w x 11h pixels, 22w x 9h
    characters.

    I'm planning on desgining a refresh controller that handles one or two
    lines. So the maximum amount of LEDs ON at one given time for a 9 line
    display would be 8*22*5=880, 880*.09ma=79.2A. Now if I had all 9 rows
    refreshing at the same time 8*22*9=1584, 1584*.09ma=142.56A!!!!

    Parts count would be lower refreshing 2 rows at once, and current would
    be less. So 90ma wouldn't dammage these LEDs? A duty cycle of 1/22 at
    70hz

    Thanks,
    Grant
     
  4. That's what the data sheet says to me.
    You will have to explain to me what some of those constants represent.
    Total current is proportional to total light output if none of the
    LED's are in series with another.
    That's what the data sheet tells me. That would correspond to
    1/(70*22)=649 us every 14.3 ms.
     
  5. logjam

    logjam Guest

    Thanks for the help! I will make sure to post pictures Friday night
    when we start constructing it. :)

    Thanks,
    Grant
    8 pixels wide for each character, 22 characters per line, 9 lines
    total. 880 LEDs if all are lit.
    However it seems like with the resistor being equal between the 1/22
    and 1/11 the light output is "the same". I could be wasting current on
    the 1/11 point though...
     
  6. logjam wrote:
    (snip)
    Eyes are notorious at being poor judges of light intensity, especially
    point sources and pure colors and trying to remember one intensity
    when you see the other. Measure the light with a photo transistor.
    Or do the experiment at night with the LED alternating between the two
    duty cycles on alternate seconds and look at it from 100 yards away.
    You should be able to see the two-to-one intensity change, clearly.
     
  7. logjam

    logjam Guest

    My idea was to use my canon camera with manual exposure settings and no
    flash. I should then be able to see a difference in Photo Shop when I
    look at the pixel values.

    One thing I DID notice was that I could see a difference when looking
    at the LED from the side. Fron the side there is a little bright green
    point and it was a little brighter on the 1/11 one.

    I'll see what I come up with tonight.

    Thanks,
    Grant
     
  8. I have a Canon digital camera and found it to have a "gamma" of about
    ..7. Pixel values would then be proportional to light successfully
    received raised to the .7 power. A pixel value of 100 represents half the
    brightness of one whose value is 162.
    I tried this with my monitor displaying alternatively a small solid
    white area and a same-size/shape area with alternating lines same white
    and black - with the camera defocused.
    Makes me think that the LEDs could be gallium phosphide red - a
    chemistry sometimes known as "low current red". These have a nonlinearity
    favoring low steady currents over high pulsed currents with short duty
    cycle. If you have such an LED being fed low duty cycle high peak current
    pulses, then expect an increase in brightness by adding a capacitor in
    parallel with the LED.
    Just don't apply a capacitor to the LED while the capacitor is charged
    well past the LED voltage - this could blow the LED.

    Gallium phosphide "low current red" LEDs do have significant color and
    spectral changes at higher currents when red tinted filtering is lacking
    or thin. At 90 milliamps they can be more yellow than red, with a "green
    spot" if viewed through eyeglasses that have a prismatic effect.

    Most red LED digital displays have (or had in their heydays) gallium
    arsenide phosphide, which have a more-opposite nonlinearity that usually
    benefits from higher instantaneous currents even at same average current.
    Those even caused a myth to arise that human vision has some sort of
    "peak-detection" mechanism to explain why these LEDs appeared brighter
    with pulsed current than with steady current where the average current was
    unchanged.

    Gallium phosphide green lacks the low-current-favoring of gallium
    phosphide red but is closer to being like GaAsP red, BTW.

    - Don ()
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-