Continuous Motion based on Newtonian Physics

[NathanCoppedge]

I have long been interested in exceptions to the rule.

Now I may have found it:

A ball weight may be supported by a fixed track, reducing energy required
to lift it along a slope.

When the ball weight reaches a position where it has gained some height,
the track can be eliminated, so that the full weight of the ball bears on
the lever.

So [1] the ball weight moves by leverage from a counter-weight up a slope

[2] the ball weight through this portion is supported partially by a fixed
track, which may be angled or beveled to hold part of the ball

[3] the ball weight moves to a position of LESSER leverage, but WITH
SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT

[4] the ball weight drops to the original position

[5] a note: downwards slope may be acquired in relation to the slight
upwards slope of the fixed track, e.g. downwards and then upwards from the
point of drop, remains level with the return position AT THE TIME OF
RETURN, BUT NOT AT THE TIME OF THE INITIAL DROP.

The above 5 instances seem to support a very simple perpetual energy
device.

Comment on specifics if you think that I'm wrong. Try to speak in my terms.

For example, it cannot be denied that [A] a counterweight can move a ball
weight on a fixed track, or either that a ball weight is partially
supported on such a track or either that [C] such a differential requires
only a method of operation.



-------------------------------------

 

[Jim Rojas]

I have long been interested in exceptions to the rule.

Now I may have found it:

A ball weight may be supported by a fixed track, reducing energy required
to lift it along a slope.

When the ball weight reaches a position where it has gained some height,
the track can be eliminated, so that the full weight of the ball bears on
the lever.

So [1] the ball weight moves by leverage from a counter-weight up a slope

[2] the ball weight through this portion is supported partially by a fixed
track, which may be angled or beveled to hold part of the ball

[3] the ball weight moves to a position of LESSER leverage, but WITH
SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT

[4] the ball weight drops to the original position

[5] a note: downwards slope may be acquired in relation to the slight
upwards slope of the fixed track, e.g. downwards and then upwards from the
point of drop, remains level with the return position AT THE TIME OF
RETURN, BUT NOT AT THE TIME OF THE INITIAL DROP.

The above 5 instances seem to support a very simple perpetual energy
device.

Comment on specifics if you think that I'm wrong. Try to speak in my terms.

For example, it cannot be denied that [A] a counterweight can move a ball
weight on a fixed track, or either that a ball weight is partially
supported on such a track or either that [C] such a differential requires
only a method of operation.

Build a working model. I would like to see a Youtube video of you work.

Jim Rojas

 

[Bob F]

I have long been interested in exceptions to the rule.

Now I may have found it:

A ball weight may be supported by a fixed track, reducing energy
required to lift it along a slope.

When the ball weight reaches a position where it has gained some
height, the track can be eliminated, so that the full weight of the
ball bears on the lever.

So [1] the ball weight moves by leverage from a counter-weight up a
slope

[2] the ball weight through this portion is supported partially by a
fixed track, which may be angled or beveled to hold part of the ball

[3] the ball weight moves to a position of LESSER leverage, but WITH
SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT

[4] the ball weight drops to the original position

[5] a note: downwards slope may be acquired in relation to the slight
upwards slope of the fixed track, e.g. downwards and then upwards
from the point of drop, remains level with the return position AT THE
TIME OF RETURN, BUT NOT AT THE TIME OF THE INITIAL DROP.

The above 5 instances seem to support a very simple perpetual energy
device.

Comment on specifics if you think that I'm wrong. Try to speak in my
terms.

For example, it cannot be denied that [A] a counterweight can move a
ball weight on a fixed track, or either that a ball weight is
partially supported on such a track or either that [C] such a
differential requires only a method of operation.

It's hard to visualize what you are talking about from this description, but it
really doesn't matter, because it won't work. Work = force x distance. If you
lessen the work by increasing the distance, it takes the same work to do the
job.

 

[Bob F]

I have long been interested in exceptions to the rule.

Now I may have found it:

A ball weight may be supported by a fixed track, reducing energy
required to lift it along a slope.

When the ball weight reaches a position where it has gained some
height, the track can be eliminated, so that the full weight of the
ball bears on the lever.

So [1] the ball weight moves by leverage from a counter-weight up a
slope

[2] the ball weight through this portion is supported partially by a
fixed track, which may be angled or beveled to hold part of the ball

[3] the ball weight moves to a position of LESSER leverage, but WITH
SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT

[4] the ball weight drops to the original position

[5] a note: downwards slope may be acquired in relation to the slight
upwards slope of the fixed track, e.g. downwards and then upwards
from the point of drop, remains level with the return position AT THE
TIME OF RETURN, BUT NOT AT THE TIME OF THE INITIAL DROP.

The above 5 instances seem to support a very simple perpetual energy
device.

Comment on specifics if you think that I'm wrong. Try to speak in my
terms.

For example, it cannot be denied that [A] a counterweight can move a
ball weight on a fixed track, or either that a ball weight is
partially supported on such a track or either that [C] such a
differential requires only a method of operation.

It's hard to visualize what you are talking about from this
description, but it really doesn't matter, because it won't work.
Work = force x distance. If you lessen the work by increasing the
distance, it takes the same work to do the job.

The last sentence should start "lessen the force".

 

[Bob F]

I have long been interested in exceptions to the rule.

Now I may have found it:

A ball weight may be supported by a fixed track, reducing energy
required to lift it along a slope.

When the ball weight reaches a position where it has gained some
height, the track can be eliminated, so that the full weight of the
ball bears on the lever.

So [1] the ball weight moves by leverage from a counter-weight up a
slope

[2] the ball weight through this portion is supported partially by a
fixed track, which may be angled or beveled to hold part of the ball

[3] the ball weight moves to a position of LESSER leverage, but WITH
SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT

[4] the ball weight drops to the original position

[5] a note: downwards slope may be acquired in relation to the slight
upwards slope of the fixed track, e.g. downwards and then upwards
from the point of drop, remains level with the return position AT
THE TIME OF RETURN, BUT NOT AT THE TIME OF THE INITIAL DROP.

The above 5 instances seem to support a very simple perpetual energy
device.

Comment on specifics if you think that I'm wrong. Try to speak in my
terms.

For example, it cannot be denied that [A] a counterweight can move a
ball weight on a fixed track, or either that a ball weight is
partially supported on such a track or either that [C] such a
differential requires only a method of operation.

-------------------------------------

As others have said it won't work. It takes x lbs of force to lift an
object to a higher point. Wether you do it over an inclined track or
lift it straight up, the force required is the same. Time and
distance is all that changes, force remains the same.

It's not the force that is the same, but the force times distance.