Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Charge controller - power diode question

Could some power electronics guru please
help ?
I am trying to put together a charge
controller for a battery pack/solar
panel array. The maximum solar panel
output current is around 20.0A, and
the maximum battery voltage is 12V.
So, in the charge controller, I was
planning to use the power diode 10A02,
whose IFmax is 10.0A and the BV is
100.0V. To deal with the 20.0A maximum
solar panel output current, I was planning
to have 3 diodes in parallel to tackle
the current, and the diode's 100.0V
BV would block reverse battery discharge.
How does this look ? Also, if I have a
simple shunt type charge controller,
what would be a good power transistor
to use at these current/voltages ?
Thanks in advance for all your hints
and suggestions.
 
M

mike

Jan 1, 1970
0
On 12/26/2012 12:20 AM, [email protected] wrote:

There have been ample discussions about the folly
of solar power when you have any alternatives.
I'll not repeat that here. I like to help
people with their hobbies.
I've helped engineer more than one solar system
for mountain-top use in the boonies.

Your statements are worrisome on many levels...
Could some power electronics guru please
help ?
I am trying to put together a charge
controller for a battery pack/solar
panel array. The maximum solar panel
output current is around 20.0A, and
the maximum battery voltage is 12V.
Depending on what batteries you're using
and the tradeoffs you've made for life vs
maximum stored energy,
your battery voltage ranges from 10V to
nearly 15V or so.
So, in the charge controller, I was
planning to use the power diode 10A02,
whose IFmax is 10.0A and the BV is
100.0V. To deal with the 20.0A maximum
solar panel output current, I was planning
to have 3 diodes in parallel to tackle
the current, and the diode's 100.0V
BV would block reverse battery discharge.
How does this look ?

Sounds logical on the surface, but there's
a troll under that bridge.
Most diodes have a negative temperature coefficient.
If there's any imbalance, one diode takes more
current and warms up which makes it hog more current
which makes it warm up. Pretty soon, you have one diode
in the circuit and the other two just sitting there.
From then on, it's a matter of time until the silicon melts
and shorts or the plastic melts and the device comes apart open.
According to the spec, that diode at 10 amps is gonna
be 150 C above ambient. That's too hot, even if you
could make three share equally. Get something with a bolt hole
and put it on a heat sink.
You're better off with one 40A diode.
And a 20V diode will likely be less lossy and cheaper
than a 100V one. And I don't mean a lower voltage one
selected out of the same bucket. I mean a diode designed
for minimum forward voltage often has a lower reverse voltage.
It doesn't have to be a fast diode.

But there's a more basic question. Many solar panels have built-in
diodes. Are you sure yours don't?

That diode has a forward voltage spec of 1V.
You've got 15V at the battery and you're wasting another volt
or 20 watts.

And it's more complex than that.
Look at the family of curves for the panel.
They're not a straight line. And the 20A is at noon in the desert.
At 3PM when the panel isn't pointed directly at the sun and there's
more atmosphere in the way and there's some haze and some bird poop
on the panel, you're gonna be on another curve of that graph.
That diode might be the difference between your charge current going to
zero at 3PM instead of 3:30 PM. Those lost amp-hours add up.
Also, if I have a
simple shunt type charge controller,
what would be a good power transistor
to use at these current/voltages ?

Shunt controller sounds simple, but again, the devil is in the
details.
We built one system that used 4 150W resistors and 4 audio power
transistors. A comparator switched the transistors on at 13.7V and off
at 13.6V.
That worked because
The panel was 20A and the batteries were 800Amp-Hour. They didn't have
any trouble with that current and voltage. And the thing rarely
turned on except on the longest days of the year.

If you had a single car battery and a 20A panel, that wouldn't be a good
idea.

A later version used an oscillator and a crude 300Hz PWM to switch the
transistors.
For a less robust battery system, you'd want a fast switcher and much
better charge management. And today, you'd be able to afford fast
switching transistors at that current.

For starters, take any 300W plus buck converter design that can run on
10-15V. Put 600W of resistors with values that can draw at least
300W from the output of the converter.
Control the converter output voltage to give you the shunt load current
you require. Since you're likely to use multiple resistors in parallel.
It might be easier to use more buck converters of lower current each.
Depends on what you can find in the cheapo bin of the electronic surplus
store.

We built a MPPT controller and a sun tracker. Worked neat and gained
some additional usable power. Problem was that it was deemed unworkable.
It's hard to track the sun when the panel is covered with ice
and the roads to the site are closed eight months out of the year.

For remote stuff that just has to work, it's often better to add another
panel than to try to eek out a few more percent on the one you have.
Reliability trumps efficiency every time.
Thanks in advance for all your hints
and suggestions.

The hardest part of any project is writing the spec.
Decide exactly what you expect to happen under any and all
conditions of insolation and load current and battery charge level.
Map that all out and decide what to implement. Then figger out HOW
to implement...repeat the cycle until it looks like what you want.
Then start ordering parts.

If you're on the grid and expect to generate power, you're likely to
give up a that point and go play a round of golf.

If you're indulging an expensive hobby, you can have great fun
with solar power. It's a lot cheaper than golf...and less risky
than a mistress.
 
On 12/26/2012 12:20 AM, [email protected] wrote:



There have been ample discussions about the folly

of solar power when you have any alternatives.

I'll not repeat that here. I like to help

people with their hobbies.

I've helped engineer more than one solar system

for mountain-top use in the boonies.



Your statements are worrisome on many levels...








Depending on what batteries you're using

and the tradeoffs you've made for life vs

maximum stored energy,

your battery voltage ranges from 10V to

nearly 15V or so.





To deal with the 20.0A maximum








Sounds logical on the surface, but there's

a troll under that bridge.

Most diodes have a negative temperature coefficient.

If there's any imbalance, one diode takes more

current and warms up which makes it hog more current

which makes it warm up. Pretty soon, you have one diode

in the circuit and the other two just sitting there.

From then on, it's a matter of time until the silicon melts

and shorts or the plastic melts and the device comes apart open.

According to the spec, that diode at 10 amps is gonna

be 150 C above ambient. That's too hot, even if you

could make three share equally. Get something with a bolt hole

and put it on a heat sink.

You're better off with one 40A diode.

And a 20V diode will likely be less lossy and cheaper

than a 100V one. And I don't mean a lower voltage one

selected out of the same bucket. I mean a diode designed

for minimum forward voltage often has a lower reverse voltage.

It doesn't have to be a fast diode.



But there's a more basic question. Many solar panels have built-in

diodes. Are you sure yours don't?



That diode has a forward voltage spec of 1V.

You've got 15V at the battery and you're wasting another volt

or 20 watts.



And it's more complex than that.

Look at the family of curves for the panel.

They're not a straight line. And the 20A is at noon in the desert.

At 3PM when the panel isn't pointed directly at the sun and there's

more atmosphere in the way and there's some haze and some bird poop

on the panel, you're gonna be on another curve of that graph.

That diode might be the difference between your charge current going to

zero at 3PM instead of 3:30 PM. Those lost amp-hours add up.

Also, if I have a






Shunt controller sounds simple, but again, the devil is in the

details.

We built one system that used 4 150W resistors and 4 audio power

transistors. A comparator switched the transistors on at 13.7V and off

at 13.6V.

That worked because

The panel was 20A and the batteries were 800Amp-Hour. They didn't have

any trouble with that current and voltage. And the thing rarely

turned on except on the longest days of the year.



If you had a single car battery and a 20A panel, that wouldn't be a good

idea.



A later version used an oscillator and a crude 300Hz PWM to switch the

transistors.

For a less robust battery system, you'd want a fast switcher and much

better charge management. And today, you'd be able to afford fast

switching transistors at that current.



For starters, take any 300W plus buck converter design that can run on

10-15V. Put 600W of resistors with values that can draw at least

300W from the output of the converter.

Control the converter output voltage to give you the shunt load current

you require. Since you're likely to use multiple resistors in parallel.

It might be easier to use more buck converters of lower current each.

Depends on what you can find in the cheapo bin of the electronic surplus

store.



We built a MPPT controller and a sun tracker. Worked neat and gained

some additional usable power. Problem was that it was deemed unworkable.

It's hard to track the sun when the panel is covered with ice

and the roads to the site are closed eight months out of the year.



For remote stuff that just has to work, it's often better to add another

panel than to try to eek out a few more percent on the one you have.

Reliability trumps efficiency every time.





The hardest part of any project is writing the spec.

Decide exactly what you expect to happen under any and all

conditions of insolation and load current and battery charge level.

Map that all out and decide what to implement. Then figger out HOW

to implement...repeat the cycle until it looks like what you want.

Then start ordering parts.



If you're on the grid and expect to generate power, you're likely to

give up a that point and go play a round of golf.



If you're indulging an expensive hobby, you can have great fun

with solar power. It's a lot cheaper than golf...and less risky

than a mistress.

Thank you very much for your detailed and insightful explanation.
I really loved your last paragraph.
 
To deal with the 20.0A maximum

Sounds logical on the surface, but there's
a troll under that bridge.
Most diodes have a negative temperature coefficient.
If there's any imbalance, one diode takes more
current and warms up which makes it hog more current
which makes it warm up. Pretty soon, you have one diode
in the circuit and the other two just sitting there.
From then on, it's a matter of time until the silicon melts
and shorts or the plastic melts and the device comes apart open.

The usual method to avoid this is to put individual series resistors
in front of each diode, thus, sharing the current more evenly.

Of course, this dissipates some power.

However, since there are usually quite a long distance between the
panels and the batteries (and diodes) at such low voltage as 12 V
(instead of 24 V or 48 V), there are still going to be some voltage
drop in the cable with cross section A, before to current goes into
three 10 A diodes.

Why not use three separate insulated conductors with A/3 cross section
from the panels, each connected separately to each diode ? The total
power loss in the wiring will be the same, but the separate wiring
will now act as small series resistors to distribute the current more
evenly.
 
J

John S

Jan 1, 1970
0
But there's a more basic question. Many solar panels have built-in
diodes. Are you sure yours don't?

Acutually, the solar panels I have in front of me have the diodes in
_parallel_ with the panel output.

The purpose, AIUI, is to provide a path for the current of shaded panels
when wired in series.

In that case, the provided diodes will not prevent current back into the
battery.
 
S

SoothSayer

Jan 1, 1970
0
Acutually, the solar panels I have in front of me have the diodes in
_parallel_ with the panel output.

The purpose, AIUI, is to provide a path for the current of shaded panels
when wired in series.

In that case, the provided diodes will not prevent current back into the
battery.

They prevent current from an illuminated panel from being loaded by a
non-illuminated panel. IOW, electrons only get to spit in one direction
from all elements. That being INTO the charging circuit input.
 
M

mike

Jan 1, 1970
0
If you look at actual diode curves, diode TC is negative at low
currents and positive at higher currents. That's because the ohmic
component of VF dominates at high current, and it has a positive TC.
It's generally safe to parallel identical diodes on the same heat
sink.






Couldn't you do a series switcher with no inductor and no catch diode?
Just connect the solar array to the battery through a mosfet or SSR,
on/off, from a comparator with maybe a little timing, like a clocked
d-flop in the path. It's simple and power dissipation would be very
low.
I didn't want to complicate the discussion.
What you suggest probably works fine. In our case, there was also a wind
generator that had some control mechanisms in the head. It didn't like
to be disconnected when the wind was blowing hard. And the solar
had a crude controller. The two controllers wanted to fight.
And the pieces were a hundred miles away and a mile straight up.
Was easier to just shunt the thing into a resistor to regulate it.

It can be a minor consideration, but series control is loss when
you need the juice most. Shunt control is loss when you've got excess
you can't use.
 
G

George Herold

Jan 1, 1970
0
Acutually, the solar panels I have in front of me have the diodes in
_parallel_ with the panel output.

The purpose, AIUI, is to provide a path for the current of shaded panels
when wired in series.

In that case, the provided diodes will not prevent current back into the
battery.

Hmm, well first I know squat about solar panels. But that seems
wasteful.
Doesn't it cost a bit more than one solar panel 'photovoltage' to
overcome the
diode drop of the panel in the shade?
Or is there a series stack of 'PV's with one diode across the whole
lot?

George H.
 
If you look at actual diode curves, diode TC is negative at low

currents and positive at higher currents. That's because the ohmic

component of VF dominates at high current, and it has a positive TC.

It's generally safe to parallel identical diodes on the same heat

sink.

Ummm- that observation only applies to the small signal stuff you work with. The power Schottky's stay negative TC all the way: see Fig. 3 http://www.vishay.com/docs/88953/m2035s.pdf

Couldn't you do a series switcher with no inductor and no catch diode?

Just connect the solar array to the battery through a mosfet or SSR,

on/off, from a comparator with maybe a little timing, like a clocked

d-flop in the path. It's simple and power dissipation would be very

low.

Yeah- if the battery was the only energy load on the system, but there might be other things like an MPP inverter which will get all confused with that scheme.
 
M

Martin Riddle

Jan 1, 1970
0
George Herold said:
Hmm, well first I know squat about solar panels. But that seems
wasteful.
Doesn't it cost a bit more than one solar panel 'photovoltage' to
overcome the
diode drop of the panel in the shade?
Or is there a series stack of 'PV's with one diode across the whole
lot?

George H.

It sounds like a 24vdc PV panel. usually they are wired up in series for
600vdc to run a Grid-tie inverter.
The shading Diode sounds plausable and may be in there for other
issues;) It's your standard ~0.5v drop power diode.
If you partially shade an array the GTI's tend to shutdown altogether,
so I'm not sure there is any benefit.

Cheers
 
All diodes eventually get to positive TC. Sometimes that point is

above the rated max current, sometimes it isn't. But it's still

usually safe to parallel identical diodes on the same heat sink. It's

really not much different dynamics than one big slab of diode which,

in theory, can have one zone hog the current. But check the data sheet

and do the math, of course.

As a rule, if there is a single component rated to handle the job, it is always more economical than using multiple copies of a component that can't handle the job. There may be exceptions.
If it won't work for you, don't do it.

I know for a fact the MPP in-/con-verter will not like you periodically clamping its input to Vbatt, so you will have to think of something else.
 
Top