Maker Pro
Maker Pro

cfl's

F

felix_unger

Jan 1, 1970
0
And as I said in my case, while I'm still watching it! Are you having
trouble reading, understanding english, or just following an argument

You originally said that it "wants to turn the TV off every time you
switch channels, after flashing for only a few seconds" . I offered a remedy
you seem hell bent on continuing for no apparent reason?

that's what you're doing, as well as hurling insults. I offered a
remedy, ie. to position the receiver so that it doesn't receive IR when
you change channels, and rather than admit that it would solve the
problem, you just poo-hoo'd the idea, and continued to bitch about the
device
That is what it's SUPPOSED to do, and IF it only did what it's SUPPOSED to
do I wouldn't have complained in the first place!


see above comments
You really are having
trouble understanding what is written, but of course that will never stop
you continuing to argue for the sake of it will it!


Fine, I'll take that bet, how much??

$100. but I wouldn't trust you to be honest
Why would it not see any current if the TV is on (NOT in standby), unless it
is faulty of course.

you've already swapped it out once, and the other one does the same
thing. What are the chances that two devices are faulty? very little.
Keep swapping it out then and see if EVERY one you get does the same
thing. If you ever get one that doesn't then you've proved that there
are faulty devices. Bet you wont tho, you would rather just bitch about
the product.
Exactly, it should work as stated by the manufacturer or you get your money
back.

but you never paid for it
That's the way it's supposed to work. IF an adjustment is needed for
different TV's, one should be provided, simple as that.

Trevor.
 
T

Trevor

Jan 1, 1970
0
felix_unger said:
You originally said that it "wants to turn the TV off every time you
switch channels, after flashing for only a few seconds" . I offered a
remedy

No you didn't, you offered a useless suggestion, a different thing
altogether.


that's what you're doing, as well as hurling insults.

If you accepted what I said rather than calling me a liar, there would have
been no argument at all.

I offered a remedy, ie. to position the receiver so that it doesn't
receive IR when you change channels,

A useless suggestion which stops the device working as intended.

and rather than admit that it would solve the problem, you just poo-hoo'd
the idea, and continued to bitch about the device

Because it DOESN'T *SOLVE* the problem, simply introduces a different
problem! That YOU fail to see that but still keep arguing is rather
pointless.

$100. but I wouldn't trust you to be honest

I'll take your bet, come see for yourself! I bet you won't!

you've already swapped it out once, and the other one does the same thing.
What are the chances that two devices are faulty? very little.

EXACTLY why I said it was a faulty DESIGN in the first place. You are still
having trouble keeping up!

Keep swapping it out then and see if EVERY one you get does the same
thing. If you ever get one that doesn't then you've proved that there are
faulty devices. Bet you wont tho, you would rather just bitch about the
product.

You seem to have infinite time to do that perhaps, and to argue as well, but
I couldn't be bothered.

but you never paid for it

MY TAXES DID!

Anyway, I've had enough arguning with idiots, so post as much follow up crap
as you like *IF* you don't intend to take up your bet!

Trevor.
 
F

felix_unger

Jan 1, 1970
0
No you didn't, you offered a useless suggestion, a different thing
altogether.

It's not useless, it works, stupid
If you accepted what I said rather than calling me a liar,

never called you a liar
there would have been no argument at all.

yes there would, because you didn't want to remedy the situation, just
complain about everything, even my suggestion that works
A useless suggestion which stops the device working as intended.

but you're complaining that it already doesn't work as intended
Because it DOESN'T *SOLVE* the problem, simply introduces a different
problem!

oh yeah, big problem.. you have to point the remote at it and press a
button when it flashes. Huge problem, HUGE!
That YOU fail to see that but still keep arguing is rather
pointless.


I'll take your bet, come see for yourself! I bet you won't!

where are you?
EXACTLY why I said it was a faulty DESIGN in the first place. You are still
having trouble keeping up!


You seem to have infinite time to do that perhaps, and to argue as well, but
I couldn't be bothered.


MY TAXES DID!

Anyway, I've had enough arguning with idiots, so post as much follow up crap
as you like *IF* you don't intend to take up your bet!

well don't post your bitching problems if you don't want ppl to respond
with suggestions
 
F

felix_unger

Jan 1, 1970
0
last time I'll ever offer you any help with anything
 
T

Trevor

Jan 1, 1970
0
felix_unger said:
last time I'll ever offer you any help with anything


Is that a promise? If that's what you call "help" I can certainly do without
it!!!

Trevor.
 
F

felix_unger

Jan 1, 1970
0
Is that a promise? If that's what you call "help" I can certainly do without
it!!!

Trevor.

I offered you a workable solution to your problem so STFU
 
Top