Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Central Station Cancel Signal

B

Bob Worthy

Jan 1, 1970
0
In that same regard, anyone who is "using" my company to commint fraud
with their insurance company is NOT welcome to do so. I also make sure
that I notifiy insurance companies when an account cancels.

Me too. There is one of those cheaper than cheap monitoring centers
advertising on the net that charges you by the way you use your system. They
have a program that if you never use your alarm but need a certificate for
your insurance company, they charge you a $1.00 per month. And I thought I
had heard everything. This industry is full of some real winners. They
probably have a Nigerian bank account they are trying to share as well!
 
R

R.H.Campbell

Jan 1, 1970
0
Cripes, who are they ? I thought I'd heard everything....

RHC


There is one of those cheaper than cheap monitoring centers
 
R

R.H.Campbell

Jan 1, 1970
0
If you really look at this, and compare their rates for a full monitoring
service as most dealers would take it, they are actually more expensive by
quite a bit.

RHC
 
F

Frank Olson

Jan 1, 1970
0
R.H.Campbell said:
If you really look at this, and compare their rates for a full monitoring
service as most dealers would take it, they are actually more expensive by
quite a bit.


At "A buck-a-month" and "a buck-a-signal"... You bet!!
 
B

Bob Worthy

Jan 1, 1970
0
Yah, I know, I love how these types play their games, but how many DIYer
type fall for it because they don't believe they will ever have an alarm
except that "once". After all, isn't that the way they were sold if they do
it themselves and don't trust the pro's. Wait until they get their first
bill after a run away while they were on vacation. Hope they didn't spend
all their money having fun. I mainly was pointing out about the insurance
cert. on systems that are never used program.
 
R

R.H.Campbell

Jan 1, 1970
0
The old marketing trick..."sell the sizzle not the steak".....duh, when will
people finally learn, you don't get something for nothing in business

RHC
 
M

Mark Leuck

Jan 1, 1970
0
Frank Olson said:
At "A buck-a-month" and "a buck-a-signal"... You bet!!

Not when you consider the typical system sends a monthly test and thats
about it 90% of the time
 
R

R.H.Campbell

Jan 1, 1970
0
Monthly ? I don't know how it is out there Frank, but around here the
dealers all use weekly tests for residential and daily for commercial. Some
even go daily for residential !

So that would be $4 a month or $30 a month in that case....better to take
their $5 package (but that's still more than most dealers pay from their
station)...n'est pa ??

RHC
 
C

Crash Gordon

Jan 1, 1970
0
They'd make a killing on the 5 buck a month plan plus 50 cents per alarm if
there was every a runaway.


| If you really look at this, and compare their rates for a full monitoring
| service as most dealers would take it, they are actually more expensive by
| quite a bit.
|
| RHC
|
| | > www.DollarAlarm.com
| >
| > | >> Cripes, who are they ? I thought I'd heard everything....
| >>
| >> RHC
| >>
| >> | >>
| >> There is one of those cheaper than cheap monitoring centers
| >> > advertising on the net that charges you by the way you use your
system.
| >> > They
| >> > have a program that if you never use your alarm but need a
certificate
| > for
| >> > your insurance company, they charge you a $1.00 per month. And I
| >> > thought
| > I
| >> > had heard everything. This industry is full of some real winners.
They
| >> > probably have a Nigerian bank account they are trying to share as
well!
| >> >>
| >> >
| >> >
| >>
| >>
| >
| >
|
|
 
C

Crash Gordon

Jan 1, 1970
0
I do daily on residential and commercial. Free logged open/closes on all
commercial unless they want reports or supervised o/c's. I also do o/c's on
snowbirds, and free keyholder service for them too.



| Monthly ? I don't know how it is out there Frank, but around here the
| dealers all use weekly tests for residential and daily for commercial.
Some
| even go daily for residential !
|
| So that would be $4 a month or $30 a month in that case....better to take
| their $5 package (but that's still more than most dealers pay from their
| station)...n'est pa ??
|
| RHC
|
| | >
in
| > message | >>
| >> | >> > If you really look at this, and compare their rates for a full
| > monitoring
| >> > service as most dealers would take it, they are actually more
expensive
| > by
| >> > quite a bit.
| >>
| >>
| >> At "A buck-a-month" and "a buck-a-signal"... You bet!!
| >
| > Not when you consider the typical system sends a monthly test and thats
| > about it 90% of the time
| >
| >
|
|
 
C

Crash Gordon

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hey, but would really be cool is if we could incorporate a card reader into
the keypad...credit card.



|
| message | >
| > | > > If you really look at this, and compare their rates for a full
| monitoring
| > > service as most dealers would take it, they are actually more
expensive
| by
| > > quite a bit.
| >
| >
| > At "A buck-a-month" and "a buck-a-signal"... You bet!!
|
| Not when you consider the typical system sends a monthly test and thats
| about it 90% of the time
|
|
 
R

R.H.Campbell

Jan 1, 1970
0
There you go ! A perfect candidate for their services....they'd get rich (I
knew I should have opened a monitoring station when I had the
chance.....:)))

RHC
 
F

Frank Olson

Jan 1, 1970
0
Not when you consider the typical system sends a monthly test and thats
about it 90% of the time


The system you consider "typical", I consider "a-typical". Our systems
transmit opens and closes as well as a daily test.
 
A

alarman

Jan 1, 1970
0
Frank Olson said:
The system you consider "typical", I consider "a-typical". Our systems
transmit opens and closes as well as a daily test.

You are sounding more like bass every day.
js
 
F

Frank Olson

Jan 1, 1970
0
alarman said:
You are sounding more like bass every day.
js


Really?? Never meant to. Opens and closes are logged for a reason. Daily
tests are transmitted for much the same reason. When I was working for
Chubb in Edmonton, several businesses wound up in severe financial trouble.
A number of them had "incidents" where the owners "said" they had armed the
system but it had "failed" to function properly when they had a break-in and
they lost "thousands" of dollars in stock, and other damages etc. Insurance
companies were looking for scape-goats and in two instances, Chubb wound up
on the receiving end of a Statement of Claim involving subrogated damages.
In order to head off any further such possibilities we started programming
all our systems to transmit opens and closes (the signals were simply
"logged" at the station if the customer wasn't paying for the reports).
It's a practice I've continued with every company I've worked for since, and
I believe a good one. In addition, there's been numerous occasions where
customers have called in to say that they weren't sure that they'd armed
their systems and could we somehow "check". "Yes, Mr. Smith, your system
was armed at 1735 hours this evening. No worries." If you're not currently
offering the service, you might consider doing so. When you can save your
customer from making a trip back to his office at the peak of rush hour
his/her expressions of gratitude sure as heck makes it all worthwhile
(particularly when it results in their recommending your service to their
friends and neighbours).

If a system fails to arm and then fails to test, we follow up the next day.
It's not unusual for a business to "shut down" suddenly. On a "monthly
test" you could wind up "out of the loop" for up to 29 days before you
realized that the phones had been disconnected and the customer's "flown the
coop". It's a good way of "staying on top" of things.
 
M

Mark Leuck

Jan 1, 1970
0
Frank Olson said:
The system you consider "typical", I consider "a-typical". Our systems
transmit opens and closes as well as a daily test.

On a residential? Thats kind of dumb and annoying for the customer
 
C

Crash Gordon

Jan 1, 1970
0
Why?

Test at 3am.

And delay open/closes to send with the test...oh wait you cant do that with
some equipment can ya.


|
| message | >
| > | >
| > >
| > > Not when you consider the typical system sends a monthly test and
thats
| > > about it 90% of the time
| >
| >
| > The system you consider "typical", I consider "a-typical". Our systems
| > transmit opens and closes as well as a daily test.
|
| On a residential? Thats kind of dumb and annoying for the customer
|
|
 
M

Mark Leuck

Jan 1, 1970
0
Crash Gordon said:
Why?

Test at 3am.

And delay open/closes to send with the test...oh wait you cant do that with
some equipment can ya.

The test I have no problem with but the O/C stuff would be a pain and why
would you want to delay O/C reports?
 
C

Crash Gordon

Jan 1, 1970
0
I thought you were objecting to o/c's interfering with homeowner phone
lines, that's the only reason I would delay o/c's - dump the o/c info along
with the daily test...saves a lot of traffic as they would all come in at
the same time (along with the test). I've done this on commercial accounts
when they're too cheap for a dedicated line and there was lots of o/cs on
different partitions during the daytime.



|
| | > Why?
| >
| > Test at 3am.
| >
| > And delay open/closes to send with the test...oh wait you cant do that
| with
| > some equipment can ya.
|
| The test I have no problem with but the O/C stuff would be a pain and why
| would you want to delay O/C reports?
|
|
|
 
Top