Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Capacitor M368 any polar-connecting?

Lene Larsen

Feb 1, 2018
28
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
28
Hi Externet, I think I can handle it now. Although it is difficult to believe the importance of such a little capacitor. But I know there will be a lot of buzzer, if it is not there.
 

Lene Larsen

Feb 1, 2018
28
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
28
Hi.
Those capacitor are made for use with alternating current too. Look for the ~ AC symbol somewhere on them. Not polarized, use any side for ±
Usually canibalizable from discarded power supplies.

----> https://www.vishay.com/docs/28132/mkt368.pdf
----> http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/23094.pdf
----> https://en.tdk.eu/inf/20/20/db/fc_2009/X1_B32911_916.pdf
Sorry, I did not write the hole name mkt 368, but I saw the specifications of mkt 368, and the legs are the same, and there are no poles, https://www.ebay.co.uk/p/Philips-MK...UF-10-100-Volts-Pack-of-20-UK-Post/1922934205
Thanks athough for answering me, and sorry for my broken English
Hi.
Those capacitor are made for use with alternating current too. Look for the ~ AC symbol somewhere on them. Not polarized, use any side for ±
Usually canibalizable from discarded power supplies.

----> https://www.vishay.com/docs/28132/mkt368.pdf
----> http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/23094.pdf
----> https://en.tdk.eu/inf/20/20/db/fc_2009/X1_B32911_916.pdf
Hi.
Those capacitor are made for use with alternating current too. Look for the ~ AC symbol somewhere on them. Not polarized, use any side for ±
Usually canibalizable from discarded power supplies.

----> https://www.vishay.com/docs/28132/mkt368.pdf
----> http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/23094.pdf
----> https://en.tdk.eu/inf/20/20/db/fc_2009/X1_B32911_916.pdf
 

Lene Larsen

Feb 1, 2018
28
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
28
Hi Cannonball, I can see now there is some different ways to mark the polarization.
 

73's de Edd

Aug 21, 2015
3,613
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
3,613
Mme Lene Larsen . . . . .

ADDITIONALLY . . . .
What I particularly noticed that the link to parts that you gave were for mere 100 V rated capacitors.
And then . . .they just used a STOCK photo with completely different values.
With the AC levels that circuit could experience I would go for a X1 or X2 rated type of rating that are
associated with full line voltage use PLUS stringent safety specifications.
Otherwise I would be using any 630V rated poly capacitors that I had on hand, for safety.

Yah . . . .
YDERLIGERE. . . .
Hvad jeg specielt bemærkede, at linket til dele, du gav, var for blot 100 V ratede kondensatorer.
Og så . . .De har lige brugt et STOCK foto med helt forskellige værdier.
Med AC-niveauer, som kredsløb kunne opleve, ville jeg gå til en X1 eller X2-vurderet type rating, der er
forbundet med fuld-line spænding brug PLUS stringente sikkerhedsspecifikationer.
Ellers ville jeg bruge nogen 630V klassificerede poly kondensatorer, som jeg havde til rådighed for sikkerheden.



73's de Edd
.....
 

Lene Larsen

Feb 1, 2018
28
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
28
Y
Mme Lene Larsen . . . . .

ADDITIONALLY . . . .
What I particularly noticed that the link to parts that you gave were for mere 100 V rated capacitors.
And then . . .they just used a STOCK photo with completely different values.
With the AC levels that circuit could experience I would go for a X1 or X2 rated type of rating that are
associated with full line voltage use PLUS stringent safety specifications.
Otherwise I would be using any 630V rated poly capacitors that I had on hand, for safety.

Yah . . . .
YDERLIGERE. . . .
Hvad jeg specielt bemærkede, at linket til dele, du gav, var for blot 100 V ratede kondensatorer.
Og så . . .De har lige brugt et STOCK foto med helt forskellige værdier.
Med AC-niveauer, som kredsløb kunne opleve, ville jeg gå til en X1 eller X2-vurderet type rating, der er
forbundet med fuld-line spænding brug PLUS stringente sikkerhedsspecifikationer.
Ellers ville jeg bruge nogen 630V klassificerede poly kondensatorer, som jeg havde til rådighed for sikkerheden.



73's de Edd
 
Top