Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Bank of Batteries ?

S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
I agree it didn't suppress the spurs, but I enjoyed Peter's response
for itself, so it didn't seem a waste of time.


You missed the comma after "agree", dipshit.
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
One of my jobs as a kid was to take my grandmother's accumulator to the
battery shop for a recharge. It was of heavy glass and you could see the
acid and the plates inside. It was heavy and the carrying handle, which
slide down for removal, had quite sharp edges. Her wireless was one of
those big old beauts with a tuning dial showing stations in every
European capital city plus all the BBC stations/studios around England.

Cheers, Sage


It was a cell, not a battery.
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
You really ARE stupid!

I must admit I thought at first that you were merely an asshole, but
there's no "merely" about it.


If you actually think that we are not all assholes, then it is you that
is truly stupid and naive.
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
What a shame. Resorting to your hand, now, are you?

Maturity ranking one to ten... you rank less than a one, boy.

D'oh!
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
Well Bucky, We were not discussing a technical subject. We were
discussing an English usage subject.

Sorry to break your immature bubble, little boy, but the subject under
discussion was quite technical, as the context in which it was presented
clearly stated.
In fact, if you had another brain cell to call upon,

Complete immaturity noted. Nice job, adolescent twit.

You prove that numerical age does not an adult make.
Don't even think that I refer to anyone other than you.
you might have
even noticed that the technical aspect was mentioned, correctly, along
with the usage aspect.

You might have noticed that the traditional meaning of the word 100%
proves my position on the subject.
Have someone read it to you.

**** off, you little 13 year old level mental midget.
You can ask questions as you encounter
the hard parts.

Keep you profane self indulgences to yourself, dipshit.
If you ever presented your "hard part", I would Bobbetize your retarded
ass in a heartbeat.
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
She isn't IN a technical group.

Dumbfuck. Do you even have any clue as to what Usenet is about? If
the post was across multiple groups, the subject is as well. Also, the OP
presented it as such.

Get a clue, dingledorf.
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
Oh goody, I never get the chance to do this in aue:

WHOOSH!

Proof that you yet another petty Usenet twit.

Do you also wear your pants down past your asscrack like the dipshit in
school these days do?
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
We tend not to do that in aue. Well, plonking yes, but we tend not to
tell the plonkee about it. I would hazard a guess that 40 or 50 folks
have already plonked you, mostly because they feel that poking the
mentally deficient through the bars is needlessly cruel.


Like I give a fat flying **** that some dumbfuck plonktard wants to
filter his access to the world.

Sorry, but your "reason" is as immature and retarded as you are.
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
What are you talking about? In another thread I'm right in the middle
of a highly technical discussion about plumbing lines and how a knob
thingy can be attached to the gizmo so it turns off the water when it
should be turning on the water if you're right-handed or red-haired.

How freakin' technical do you want?
If you were not asking a complete mental midget, you might actually get
an intelligent response from the dipshit.
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
Reads to me all of you boys involved in this thread
need fresh batteries for your dildoes; you are uptight.
Good one. However, the phrase should have been "a fresh battery", OR
"fresh cells".

It is absolutely a plurality issue, and I cannot believe for an instant
that you quick to pounce chumps are so tunnel visioned by the Usenet
horse blinders you have donned to see it. You prove that Usenet
epitomizes the social "clic" mentality.

Pretty sad, actually.
 
H

HVS

Jan 1, 1970
0
Is everyone in that group as retarded as you are?

Sorry, but "some quite interestingly cross posters..." is NOT
correct.

"Some quite interesting cross-posters" would have been right.

Oh goody, I never get the chance to do this in aue:

WHOOSH![/QUOTE]

And doesn't that feel good!

(Alas, he/she/it's rapidly becoming an uninterestingly -- nay,
boringly -- cross poster, doncha' think?)
 
H

HVS

Jan 1, 1970
0
On 25 Jul 2007, Oleg Lego wrote

Have someone read it to you. You can ask questions as you
encounter the hard parts.

One of the strangest things is the way this poster responds to each
point that Peter makes by creating an entirely separate message.

I guess he hasn't realised that one can respond to more than one
thing at a time -- or finds it all too frighteningly complex. (Or
thinks Peter will read and respond to each one....nah, even "Multi-
tasking R'nt Us" wouldn't be that deluded.)
 
H

HVS

Jan 1, 1970
0
On 25 Jul 2007, Oleg Lego wrote
Limited attention span, I figure.

Yes, probably, and also he seems to oh, look: a bird just landed on
the window ledge.

Umm...where was I?
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
One of the strangest things is the way this poster responds to each
point that Peter makes by creating an entirely separate message.


**** you. I do not have to utilize your lame paradigm for post
responses.

You got a problem? Piss off.
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
I guess he hasn't realised that one can respond to more than one
thing at a time

Yet another E-1 grade retarded assessment from a total twit that should
not even be making such assessments about others.

Straighten out your own house, dipshit.
-- or finds it all too frighteningly complex.

More utter stupidity.
(Or
thinks Peter will read and respond to each one....nah, even "Multi-
tasking R'nt Us" wouldn't be that deluded.)

You are about as mature as a freshly laid turd.
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
Limited attention span, I figure.


No, dipshit.... A read of a segment of some lame twit's baby bullshit,
and a response to that baby bullshit.

If I can engineer a product and author several hundred pages of
specifications for it, I can handle some dipshit's Usenet blather.
 
S

Spurious Response

Jan 1, 1970
0
The object was called an "accumulator". The place to which I took it was
called, in common parlance, "the battery shop".

Cheers, Sage


Well, have a look at this most recent NASA Tech Briefs, and examine the
article about CELL types, and when they become BATTERIES of cells.

BTW, "Battery shops" back then were primarily for the lead acid
batteries of the time, and they were multiple celled devices. Their
servicing and recharging or various other CELLS of the day, and the name
of their shop were not related.

Care to try again.
 
A

Amethyst Deceiver

Jan 1, 1970
0
If you were not asking a complete mental midget, you might actually get
an intelligent response from the dipshit.

This from someone who apparently doesn't know how to trim his posts.
 
A

Amethyst Deceiver

Jan 1, 1970
0
[snip - because apparently you don't know how to do that]
Proof that you yet another petty Usenet twit.

Proof that you are yet another illiterate Usenet twit.
Do you also wear your pants down past your asscrack like the dipshit in
school these days do?

One dipshit, two dipshits.

You're really not very clever, are you.
 
T

tony cooper

Jan 1, 1970
0
This from someone who apparently doesn't know how to trim his posts.

Oh, no! Now you've done it. They aren't posts. They're anodes.
 
Top