S
Spurious Response
- Jan 1, 1970
- 0
I agree it didn't suppress the spurs, but I enjoyed Peter's response
for itself, so it didn't seem a waste of time.
You missed the comma after "agree", dipshit.
I agree it didn't suppress the spurs, but I enjoyed Peter's response
for itself, so it didn't seem a waste of time.
One of my jobs as a kid was to take my grandmother's accumulator to the
battery shop for a recharge. It was of heavy glass and you could see the
acid and the plates inside. It was heavy and the carrying handle, which
slide down for removal, had quite sharp edges. Her wireless was one of
those big old beauts with a tuning dial showing stations in every
European capital city plus all the BBC stations/studios around England.
Cheers, Sage
You really ARE stupid!
I must admit I thought at first that you were merely an asshole, but
there's no "merely" about it.
What a shame. Resorting to your hand, now, are you?
Well Bucky, We were not discussing a technical subject. We were
discussing an English usage subject.
In fact, if you had another brain cell to call upon,
you might have
even noticed that the technical aspect was mentioned, correctly, along
with the usage aspect.
Have someone read it to you.
You can ask questions as you encounter
the hard parts.
She isn't IN a technical group.
Oh goody, I never get the chance to do this in aue:
WHOOSH!
We tend not to do that in aue. Well, plonking yes, but we tend not to
tell the plonkee about it. I would hazard a guess that 40 or 50 folks
have already plonked you, mostly because they feel that poking the
mentally deficient through the bars is needlessly cruel.
If you were not asking a complete mental midget, you might actually getWhat are you talking about? In another thread I'm right in the middle
of a highly technical discussion about plumbing lines and how a knob
thingy can be attached to the gizmo so it turns off the water when it
should be turning on the water if you're right-handed or red-haired.
How freakin' technical do you want?
Good one. However, the phrase should have been "a fresh battery", ORReads to me all of you boys involved in this thread
need fresh batteries for your dildoes; you are uptight.
Is everyone in that group as retarded as you are?
Sorry, but "some quite interestingly cross posters..." is NOT
correct.
"Some quite interesting cross-posters" would have been right.
Have someone read it to you. You can ask questions as you
encounter the hard parts.
Limited attention span, I figure.
One of the strangest things is the way this poster responds to each
point that Peter makes by creating an entirely separate message.
I guess he hasn't realised that one can respond to more than one
thing at a time
-- or finds it all too frighteningly complex.
(Or
thinks Peter will read and respond to each one....nah, even "Multi-
tasking R'nt Us" wouldn't be that deluded.)
Limited attention span, I figure.
The object was called an "accumulator". The place to which I took it was
called, in common parlance, "the battery shop".
Cheers, Sage
If you were not asking a complete mental midget, you might actually get
an intelligent response from the dipshit.
Proof that you yet another petty Usenet twit.
Do you also wear your pants down past your asscrack like the dipshit in
school these days do?
This from someone who apparently doesn't know how to trim his posts.