Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Are 5 GHz telephones safe?

I

Ian Stirling

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don Pearce said:
I suggest you try and find any evidence that any mobile phone,
anywhere has ever caused anybody actual harm by way of its RF field.

All you will find is urban myth.

It's caused me harm.
By a bizarre coincidence of events, a mobile ringing on top of a CDROM
drive with its cover off caused the drive to eject, and push a coffee
cup over on my head.
 
D

Don Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
It's caused me harm.
By a bizarre coincidence of events, a mobile ringing on top of a CDROM
drive with its cover off caused the drive to eject, and push a coffee
cup over on my head.

I've always known that coffee is bad for you. This proves it.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
 
S

Spehro Pefhany

Jan 1, 1970
0
It's caused me harm.
By a bizarre coincidence of events, a mobile ringing on top of a CDROM
drive with its cover off caused the drive to eject, and push a coffee
cup over on my head.

<LOL> And there was no warning label about that sort of thing on the
CD-ROM drive, I'll bet.


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
 
D

Dirk Bruere at Neopax

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don said:
I suggest you try and find any evidence that any mobile phone,
anywhere has ever caused anybody actual harm by way of its RF field.

All you will find is urban myth.

Remains to be seen since cancer takes up to 30yrs to manifest.
I'll let you know the definitive opinion around 2020

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
 
D

Don Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
Remains to be seen since cancer takes up to 30yrs to manifest.
I'll let you know the definitive opinion around 2020

As I said, we have lived in similar, but vastly more intense radio
fields for sixty years. You can voice a definitive opinion right now-
there is no problem.

d

(ps, please don't come back with the weak fields argument; people who
live further from TV transmitters enjoy exactly these weak fields, and
still no effect)
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
 
D

Don Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
I suggest you check the work of Persinger and others concerning effects of low
level mag fields and modulations.

I'm sorry _ I misread what you wrote here. Mobile phones don't
generate mag fields. The earth, however, does and to modulate it all
you need to do is turn round.

d
Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
 
D

Dirk Bruere at Neopax

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don said:
As I said, we have lived in similar, but vastly more intense radio
fields for sixty years. You can voice a definitive opinion right now-
there is no problem.

Not "vastly more intense" than holding a transmitter next to the brain on a
regular basis for hours a week.
Nor at the more absorbable high frequencies of mobile phones.

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
 
D

Dirk Bruere at Neopax

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don said:
I'm sorry _ I misread what you wrote here. Mobile phones don't
generate mag fields. The earth, however, does and to modulate it all
you need to do is turn round.

The implications of Persinger's work goes beyond low level mag fields, and
mainly concerns modulations. I would not have believed effects were possible as
detailed, except that it does seem incontravertible.

--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
 
D

Don Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
The implications of Persinger's work goes beyond low level mag fields, and
mainly concerns modulations. I would not have believed effects were possible as
detailed, except that it does seem incontravertible.

Persinger's work has been comprehensively discredited.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
 
D

Dirk Bruere at Neopax

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don said:
Nonetheless, it is.

One report in Nature about a researcher who could not reproduce a result,
submitted to another journal?
You think that is all it takes to 'comprehensive discredit' the work of many
people over decades? [Persinger is not alone in getting the results he gets]


--
Dirk

The Consensus:-
The political party for the new millenium
http://www.theconsensus.org
 
D

Don Pearce

Jan 1, 1970
0
Don said:
Nonetheless, it is.

One report in Nature about a researcher who could not reproduce a result,
submitted to another journal?
You think that is all it takes to 'comprehensive discredit' the work of many
people over decades? [Persinger is not alone in getting the results he gets]

Absolutely, repeatability is what this is all about. The same thing
happened over cold fusion.

d

Pearce Consulting
http://www.pearce.uk.com
 
R

Rich Grise

Jan 1, 1970
0
As I said, we have lived in similar, but vastly more intense radio
fields for sixty years. You can voice a definitive opinion right now-
there is no problem.

Yeah, and my Dad quit smoking 40 or so years ago, and you know what? He
died anyway.

Antismokerism does not cause immortality.

Cheers!
Rich
 
Top