Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Antenna Power for Nibiru Communication

Z

Zecharia Sitchin

Jan 1, 1970
0
What would be the optimum type of antenna, power level, and frequency to
communicate from CONUS to Nibiru?
 
T

Tom Bruhns

Jan 1, 1970
0
What do you mean by optimum?? Do you have an infinite supply of
money, or is that one of the constraints? Do you have a license to
transmit on some frequencies? How much land area on each end do you
have to work with? Do you care how much power you need to use, or do
you want to keep it below some level? What other constraints are you
operating under that will help you evaluate just what "optimum" means?
And what are you trying to communicate? That is, can you work with
very low data rates, say one word per hour, or do you want to send
television signals or high speed data? (What do you need to
communicate, and how long can you afford to wait to do it?)

If you want to be able to reliably communicate at any time and you
have enough funds, a satellite based system is likely your best bet.
Cell phones, with their built-in antennas and self-adjusting power,
should be fine if you are close enough on each end to the required
infrastructure. (i.e., let someone else do all the RF work for you if
you can.)

If you want a direct earth-based RF link, with no relay stations
between, you can do it on either high frequencies or VLF. With VLF,
it will take very large antenna structures and high power (many
kilowatts), but once you have a working system, it will work pretty
much any time. On HF, there will be times when it is impossible to
establish a link at any power, and other times when one watt is
sufficient. Generally expect to use frequencies between 10MHz and
30MHz, and expect to need a license. (You can be sure that other
people will hear your communications.) Because the frequency you'll
want to use will change with the condition of the ionosphere (which
depends in turn on things such as solar activity and time of day and
season), you'll want an antenna system that can accomodate a range of
frequencies. It probably would be helpful to have some directionality
in the antenna, as you'd get with a Yagi or log-periodic array, but a
simple dipole antenna will work under the right ionospheric
conditions.

You can learn a lot about this sort of thing if you read some amateur
radio publications. I suppose current editions of "The Radio
Amateur's Handbook" from ARRL would be a good place to start.

Cheers,
Tom
 
K

k4wge

Jan 1, 1970
0
What would be the optimum type of antenna, power level, and frequency to
communicate from CONUS to Nibiru?

Have you considered using a heliograph?
 
J

J. McLaughlin

Jan 1, 1970
0
Dear Mr. Bruhns:
Yours was a well presented description of the issues attendant to
terrestrial radio communication.
However, Nibiru is a mythological planet that no radio signal can
reach because it is hidden from view.
73 Mac N8TT
 
R

Roger Gt

Jan 1, 1970
0
X-No-Archive: yes
: What do you mean by optimum?? Do you have an infinite supply of
: money, or is that one of the constraints? Do you have a license
to
: transmit on some frequencies? How much land area on each end do
you
: have to work with? Do you care how much power you need to use,
or do
: you want to keep it below some level? What other constraints
are you
: operating under that will help you evaluate just what "optimum"
means?
: And what are you trying to communicate? That is, can you work
with
: very low data rates, say one word per hour, or do you want to
send
: television signals or high speed data? (What do you need to
: communicate, and how long can you afford to wait to do it?)
:
: If you want to be able to reliably communicate at any time and
you
: have enough funds, a satellite based system is likely your best
bet.
: Cell phones, with their built-in antennas and self-adjusting
power,
: should be fine if you are close enough on each end to the
required
: infrastructure. (i.e., let someone else do all the RF work for
you if
: you can.)
:
: If you want a direct earth-based RF link, with no relay stations
: between, you can do it on either high frequencies or VLF. With
VLF,
: it will take very large antenna structures and high power (many
: kilowatts), but once you have a working system, it will work
pretty
: much any time. On HF, there will be times when it is impossible
to
: establish a link at any power, and other times when one watt is
: sufficient. Generally expect to use frequencies between 10MHz
and
: 30MHz, and expect to need a license. (You can be sure that
other
: people will hear your communications.) Because the frequency
you'll
: want to use will change with the condition of the ionosphere
(which
: depends in turn on things such as solar activity and time of day
and
: season), you'll want an antenna system that can accommodate a
range of
: frequencies. It probably would be helpful to have some
directionality
: in the antenna, as you'd get with a Yagi or log-periodic array,
but a
: simple dipole antenna will work under the right ionospheric
: conditions.
:
: You can learn a lot about this sort of thing if you read some
amateur
: radio publications. I suppose current editions of "The Radio
: Amateur's Handbook" from ARRL would be a good place to start.
:
: Cheers,
: Tom
:
:
: > What would be the optimum type of antenna, power level, and
frequency to
: > communicate from CONUS to Nibiru?

You want to talk to the "Anunnaki?" What language do they speak?
The Planet is so far away that there will be a significant delay
and high power UHF with a narrow focus Large parabolic mirror will
likely be necessary.

I would sure like to know if you expect an answer!
 
B

Barkley

Jan 1, 1970
0
My research and field trials demonstrated that
using a space orbiting array powered by fusion generators
can produce a temporal distortial.

Once the distortion has opened up, use of a tunneling neutrino
partial beam would be sufficient to transmit the information.

Now to receive it on the other end is another story.

barkley
 
C

Cecil Moore

Jan 1, 1970
0
J. McLaughlin said:
However, Nibiru is a mythological planet that no radio signal can
reach because it is hidden from view.

Is that the same as Sitchin's 12th planet? If so, it is
presently supposed to be far, far outside the orbit of
Pluto about halfway through a 3600 year orbit.
 
C

Cecil Moore

Jan 1, 1970
0
Barkley said:
Now to receive it on the other end is another story.

Shoulda latched onto a piece of THEIR transceiving
equipment the last time they were close (a couple
of thousand years ago).
 
T

Tom Bruhns

Jan 1, 1970
0
J. McLaughlin said:
Dear Mr. Bruhns:
Yours was a well presented description of the issues attendant to
terrestrial radio communication.
However, Nibiru is a mythological planet that no radio signal can
reach because it is hidden from view.
73 Mac N8TT
....

Hook, line and sinker, eh? Ah, well, the postings really are more
often for the lurkers than the OPs.

Now if only that had been the worst thing that happened to me today.
:-(

Cheers,
Tom
 
M

Mike Coslo

Jan 1, 1970
0
Barkley said:
My research and field trials demonstrated that
using a space orbiting array powered by fusion generators
can produce a temporal distortial.

Once the distortion has opened up, use of a tunneling neutrino
partial beam would be sufficient to transmit the information.

Now to receive it on the other end is another story.


Wrong! Geordi used that same method once on STTNG to try to make ice
cream once. Didn't work then and never would.

- Mike -
 
R

Rosco

Jan 1, 1970
0
If a hen and a half laid an egg and a half in a day and a half, how long
would it take for a peg legged monkey to kick the seeds out of a gourd?

LOL
 
K

K Williams

Jan 1, 1970
0
Mike said:
Wrong! Geordi used that same method once on STTNG to try to make
ice cream once. Didn't work then and never would.

Geordi didn't have the right script writers. Any decent writer
would have had him take a hair-pin and modify the food replicator
to create the necessary neutrino beam. Of course, the replicator
would have had to be set to "ice_cream.ben_and_jerrys" to get it
all together.
 
A

Alan

Jan 1, 1970
0
My research and field trials demonstrated that
using a space orbiting array powered by fusion generators
can produce a temporal distortial.

Once the distortion has opened up, use of a tunneling neutrino
partial beam would be sufficient to transmit the information.

Now to receive it on the other end is another story.
Could we use a tunnel diode as a detector?


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jenal Communications
Manufacturers and Suppliers of HF Selcall
P O Box 1108, Morley, WA, 6943
Tel: +61 8 9370 5533 Fax +61 8 9467 6146
Web Site: http://www.jenal.com
e-mail: http://www.jenal.com/?p=1
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Top