Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Airy R Bean

A

Airy R. Bean

Jan 1, 1970
0
I think that you'll find that I am not squabbling, but am
asserting the right to reply, in each case.
 
A

Airy R. Bean

Jan 1, 1970
0
Recently you yourself accused me of making attacks on others.
I challenged you to come up with evidence.
You have failed to do so.
Perhaps you are using the Freudian mechanism of projection
to accuse me of doing that which you find to be unacceptable
in yourself?
 
A

Airy R. Bean

Jan 1, 1970
0
My contributions to this NG are entirely technical except when
I assert the right to reply to attacks, especially when those attacks
are a gratuitous, unsolicited and infantile outburst as is yours below.

If you think that there is a call to keep this NG to matters of
technical interest, then I exhort you to think again about
your infantile style, as below. It is you and your ilk who
are destroying this NG and not those of us who make a stand
for civil and polite behaviour.

Stupid boy.

Grow up.
 
R

RVMJ 99g

Jan 1, 1970
0
Airy said:
It is you and your ilk who
are destroying this NG and not those of us who make a stand
for civil and polite behaviour.

Good grief! Does he really believe he is showing 'civil and polite
behaviour'?
 
H

huLLy

Jan 1, 1970
0
RVMJ 99g said:
Good grief! Does he really believe he is showing 'civil and polite
behaviour'?

Only if you swap civil for paranoid and polite for schizophrenic!
 
D

DarkMatter

Jan 1, 1970
0
And no-one cares in uk.radio.amateur, uk.rec.models.engineering or
alt.engineering.electrical
Actually.... Nobody gives a fat flying **** about it AT ALL!
 
M

Marco

Jan 1, 1970
0
in message
wrote in message
............SNIP.........

It would appear that Gareth Evans is still the same disruptive
nuisance as the one we were caused to release from employment at
Westinghouse.

David

Do tell us more please.




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system
(http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.563 / Virus Database: 355 - Release
Date: 17/01/2004
 
D

David

Jan 1, 1970
0
You're a goddamned reay-tard!

One day people will realise that the way to get rid of trolls is to not
keep responding to them or posting in their little threads.

It really is that simple.
 
D

DarkMatter

Jan 1, 1970
0
Spare uk.railway - we really couldn't care less.

I would suggest a complaint against Mr. Bean, since it was he that
replaced your group into the follow ups after your first request to
discount it from the thread.

I would find and use that post as the basis for the complaint.

I would make an exact such complaint again if he replaces it again
in the future, after it has been intentionally removed and requested
to be discounted by members of the group. I would suggest that all
annoyed by this thread make the same complaint, based on the same
criteria. Or the little bat's turd could simply comply with your
desires.

THIS will get you your desired results.
 
D

DarkMatter

Jan 1, 1970
0
One day people will realise that the way to get rid of trolls is to not
keep responding to them or posting in their little threads.

It really is that simple.


Well, we certainly don't need a fucking Usenet primer on it from
you.
 
G

Graham W

Jan 1, 1970
0
Rich Mackin said:
Spare uk.railway - we really couldn't care less.
You should. Airy R Bean has caused problems in your group.

If you have children you should also hope he doesn't take an interest in
them.

GW
 
A

Airy R. Bean

Jan 1, 1970
0
Whatever reason you have for your emotional distress,
please stick to the truth.

You do yourself no favours by your rather silly and
childish outburst, as below.

As to "causing problems in your group", do you not think,
perhaps, that problems are only caused when emotionally disturbed
people such as yourself launch themselves in a sea of vitriol,
as you do below?
 
G

Geoff

Jan 1, 1970
0
Well, I for one don't agree that Mr Reay's contributions comprise
'rather silly and childish outbursts'. I also don't agree that
whatever he posts here should 'reflect' on his children, who do not
post here. Your attitude to this is, IMHO, disgraceful. Take Mr Reay
on and beat him if you can. I for one doubt you can. But I believe at
a minimum you should apologise for causing concern where none should
have been raised, like the 'gentlemanly traditions' of which you are
so fond of would demand. HTH.

[Follow-ups set]

RVMJ,

I think that the majority of posters in uk.r.a agree with your "I for one
don't agree that Mr Reay's contributions comprise 'rather silly and
childish outbursts'". I also think that there is a great deal of support
for your view that references to Brian's (or any other) children are
totally reprehensible.

Geoff
 
F

F1LBY

Jan 1, 1970
0
You lose the argument instantly by hurling a tirade of insults (not
profanities) at others.
Just by refusing to acknowledge your identity and use a name that is an
anagram of Mr Reay's name indicates that it is you who is the wrongdoer by
attempting provocation.
Of course, I may be wrong regarding the facts. But in light of the evidence
we have all seen on this newsgroup, it is you who incites anger and upset. I
have been a participant in this NG for over 1 year and in all cases, it is
always Airy R. Bean who posts rude, unhelpful and potentially upsetting
statements.
An argument was never won by name calling (even in the playground). Airy R.
Bean likes to have a high opinion of himself (nothing wrong with that), but
fails to back this up by his poor behaviour indicating that he is the
opposite of what he would like to be.

If Airy R. Bean was the president of USA, we'd be in the middle of a very
serious war with Pakistan or India with the immediate threat of nuclear
strikes... Lets just be thankful that he is only priviledged to make
anonymous postings to an insignificant radio newsgroup and nothing
more.......

Such a shame to see a man reduced to this...........
 
Top