Airy R Bean

[Airy R. Bean]

If he wishes to publish details about his family, then he cannot
complain when the details that are published become public
knowledge and are then commented upon.

If he contemporaneously wishes to publish scurrilous and untrue
accusations about bestiality with sheep in a public manner, then
he cannot complain when his behaviour that he has made so public
is also commented upon.

 

[Airy R. Bean]

No, I don't agree with that - if Mr.Reay contemporaneously
publishes details of his family and exhibits behaviour in public that
does not correlate with what one expects from a family man,
then it is a matter of public interest that there should be comment,
and very public comment at that.

 

[Airy R. Bean]

In another post you claim that you publish nothing
that would warrant criticism laid at your door by me.

I suggest that you review that comment in the light of
your gratuitous and unfounded attack below.

 

[Chris - G0TOO]

Your quick to tell others to quote messages so why dont you quote the ones
where I attack you.

If people want to read the posts where you made those comments then they can
scroll down and read the thread entitled "What is Amateur Radio" where they
will see that I didnt attack you, I merely pointed out that if you were a
holder of a current validation document that it says nowhere on it the word
"ham" it does however contain the word "Amateur" which you say you are not,
and as you say you are not then you must not hold a current validation
document meaning you are not licenced.
That is not provocation, that is you getting angry at the fact that you have
been proven wrong on this matter.

Cheerrs Chris - G0TOO

--
All outgoing mail is checked using
Sophos Anti-Virus
Version 3.73
Virus definitions updated daily

And outgoing attatchment protection using
Zone Alarm Pro
Version 4.0.146.029

 

[Airy R. Bean]

I shall simply show them to be a defence against the
scurrilous and ongoing attack that has come from you,
an attack that has been as wide ranging in its scope
as it has been untrue.

I think that you yourself need to research the offence
of, "Wasting Police Time".

 

[Brian Reay]

You are quite wrong. That I have never considered Mr.Reay's
daughters to be fair game is entirely relevant and a rightful defence
to Mr.Reay's assertions to the contrary.

So why are so many posts (around 37) from you in Google referring to them?

All ready to be printed off, with IP addresses that link them to you.

I wonder how you will explain that to Wiltshire Police, and your family and
neighbours.

In contrast, there is one from me, mentioning one of them with perfectly
reasonable reference to learning Latin.


Anyway, this debate is pointless. You don't have to convince me or anyone in
the NG you are 'innocent' - your problem will be much closer to home.
ISP, police, family, neighbours. Your continued attempts to defend you
actions is just making you look more guilty.

Of course, your law book might help but I fancy even you have spotted that
isn't the case.

 

[Airy R. Bean]

It would seem that a large number of the posts are in reply
to your own raising of the subject.

So why are so many posts (around 37) from you in Google referring to

them?

 

[Airy R. Bean]

I am guilty of no more than defending myself against your
rather silly and childish onslaught, an onslaught that accused
me repeatedly of acts of bestiality with sheep.

You really cannot justify such a campaign.

Shame on you.

 

[Chris - G0TOO]

In another post you claim that you publish nothing
that would warrant criticism laid at your door by me.

I suggest that you review that comment in the light of
your gratuitous and unfounded attack below.

Thats just the point isnt it, its not unfounded it is a fact, if you like
the facts then why dont you cancel the messages that incriminate you, its
easy to do you know, if your using outlook express highlight the message you
want to cancel then click on message in the menu bar and select cancel
message, this sends a cancel notification to the newsgroup servers.

Cheers Chris - G0TOO

 

[Airy R. Bean]

Mr.Reay continues with his rather silly and childish sneers.

What on earth would his daughters think of him if they were allowed to
have access to Usenet? Would they find there to be a disparity, hypocrisy
perhaps, against the standards that he imposes on them while they
grow up?

 

[Airy R. Bean]

You're the one who has dived in with an unprovoked attack.
It is from you that we expect the evidence.

Over to you.....

 

[Airy R. Bean]

I'm not getting angry; are you making this up as you go along?

As to being proven wrong, you asserted that you had a
certificate that described you as a radio amateur. When I
challenged you on that point, you were unable to
produce the goods.

Then, if there was any anger around, it came from you
because you had made a fool of yourself. You didn't need
any help from me thereto, you managed it all by yourself.

An example of your anger is the way in which you have
jumped into this thread and are lashing out at me.

 

[huLLy]

Anyway, this debate is pointless. You don't have to convince me or anyone in
the NG you are 'innocent' - your problem will be much closer to home.
ISP, police, family, neighbours. Your continued attempts to defend you
actions is just making you look more guilty.

I wonder what stories his neighbours could tell... Maybe a letter or two
asking them

 

[Airy R. Bean]

I quote from your very first appearance on the 6th Jan.....

".....all you have done is behave ungentlemanly .....
you are a bigot and in the respect of amatuer radio you definately are not a
gentleman, or not on this newsgroup anyway."

That seems to be to be an attack, and an unprovoked one at that.

 

[Airy R. Bean]

Come on now, OM, you asserted that I was having tantrums
and was being uncivil and impolite. If "it is a fact" and "not
unfounded", then produce your evidence.

Otherwise you're just going round in circles, in somewhat
silly infantile circles, and making yourself appear to be a fool.

You are reminiscent of the child in the school playground who
is NNNNNing from behind the safety of a wall.

 

[Chris - G0TOO]

In fact, I invite whose who may be interested (is
anybody really?) to visit the uk.radio.amateur newsgroup
and seek all postings by author, "G0TOO".

From his first appearance in the NG on the 6th January
this year, he dived right in with personal attacks on me.
ISTR that there were 3 gratuitous and unprovoked out-of-the-blue
attacks on me by G0TOO before I responded at all, and then
only in defence.

I guess this is what you are on about below, which as such doesnt constitute
an attack, all it does is point out an observation that anyone can see if
they read your posts.

[QOUTE BY AIRY]
As to the title, I have never been a stirrer. My stance has always been
and remains that Ham radio is a technical pursuit with gentlemanly
traditions. I have not resorted to backstabbing and neither have I resorted
to name-calling.
[UN QOUTE]

Since I have started reading this newsgroup all you have done is behave
ungentlemanly to all radio amatuers from G6 onwards, the impression you try
to give is that anyone who passed since multiple choice exams came into
effect is not worth talking to. I feel that I will not be alone in thinking
you are a bigot and in the respect of amatuer radio you definately are not a
gentleman, or not on this newsgroup anyway.

I expect this will get the usual reply from you about the cber reveals
himself etc, even though you act more like a cber than anyone on here.

 

[Airy R. Bean]

Of course it's not an attack!

How silly of me not to realise that!

Words such as, "bigot", "ungentlemanly", "not worth talking to",
"you act more like a cber than anyone" are entirely impartial
and lack any ad hominem meaning. Of course they just point out
an observation!

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa!!!!!!

Stupid boy.

In fact, I invite whose who may be interested (is
anybody really?) to visit the uk.radio.amateur newsgroup
and seek all postings by author, "G0TOO".
From his first appearance in the NG on the 6th January
this year, he dived right in with personal attacks on me.
ISTR that there were 3 gratuitous and unprovoked out-of-the-blue
attacks on me by G0TOO before I responded at all, and then
only in defence.

I guess this is what you are on about below, which as such doesnt constitute
an attack, all it does is point out an observation that anyone can see if
they read your posts.
[QOUTE BY AIRY]
As to the title, I have never been a stirrer. My stance has always been
and remains that Ham radio is a technical pursuit with gentlemanly
traditions. I have not resorted to backstabbing and neither have I resorted
to name-calling.
[UN QOUTE]
Since I have started reading this newsgroup all you have done is behave
ungentlemanly to all radio amatuers from G6 onwards, the impression you try
to give is that anyone who passed since multiple choice exams came into
effect is not worth talking to. I feel that I will not be alone in thinking
you are a bigot and in the respect of amatuer radio you definately are not a
gentleman, or not on this newsgroup anyway.
I expect this will get the usual reply from you about the cber reveals
himself etc, even though you act more like a cber than anyone on here.

 

[Alan Mears - M0TEC]

Yes - it'll be good to get away from the likes of Reay and Stephenson.

Bye now.....Missing you already..... NOT

 

[Alan Mears - M0TEC]

I quote from your very first appearance on the 6th Jan.....

".....all you have done is behave ungentlemanly .....
you are a bigot and in the respect of amatuer radio you definately are not a
gentleman, or not on this newsgroup anyway."

That seems to be to be an attack, and an unprovoked one at that.

Doesn't sound like an attack to me, just a summing up of fact

 

[John Stevenson]

Yes - it'll be good to get away from the likes of Reay and Stephenson.

Sorry mate I was the second starter member.

Going to Harrogate Mr Bean?
I'll buy you a pint.