Connect with us

Advice on remote photodiodes

Discussion in 'Electronic Basics' started by Robert Monsen, Nov 10, 2003.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. I am helping with a project which requires remote sensors, in the form of
    photodiodes. These photodiodes will be activated by a shadow passing over a
    hole. The shadow will be there for less than 60ms. This will be required to
    generate a logic high pulse of at least a couple of ms at the input of a
    PIC. The goals are that it be reliable, cheap, and durable. The environment
    is very noisy electrically, since there will be lots of little electric
    motors running in the area, within inches of the sensor circuit.

    The sensors will be a maximum of 164' from the PIC. The hope is to use cat5
    cable, simply because its available.

    I would like to power the sensors remotely through the cable.

    My initial idea is to simply put power and ground on three of the twisted
    pairs to power a driver circuit, which would consist of a transistor circuit
    as follows:

    Please view with a fixed font like courier...

    VCC
    +---------+-----------
    | | |
    | .-. .-.
    | | | | |
    | | | 1k | | 4k7
    photodiode - '-' '-'
    ^ | | A
    | +----+--------------
    | | | |
    | |/ | |
    +-------| .-. | B
    | |> | | +--------
    | | | |10k |
    | | '-' |
    .-. | | |/
    | | | +---|
    10k | | | |>
    '-' | |
    | | |
    | | |
    +---------+-----------
    GND
    created by Andy´s ASCII-Circuit v1.24.140803 Beta www.tech-chat.de

    The transistors would be junkbox NPNs like 2N2222A or 2N4401s.

    At the PIC, the output would be determined by measuring the difference
    between A and B. A < B would mean 0, and A > B would mean 1.

    I'd use a little differential amp to determine the result, which would be
    fed into the PIC.

    VCC
    |
    +-------+
    | .-.
    | | |100k
    | | |
    | '-'
    | | To PIC
    | +------------
    | |
    ___ |/ \| ___
    A-|___|--| |--|___|-B
    1k |< >| 1k
    | |
    +---|---+
    |
    |
    .-.
    | |
    | |1k
    '-'
    |
    GND
    created by Andy´s ASCII-Circuit v1.24.140803 Beta www.tech-chat.de

    Again, the transistors are junkbox NPNs. A and B would be connected to A and
    B in the transmitter via one of the twisted pairs in the cat5 cable.

    Does this seem like a good approach? Do you think it be fast enough to get
    good logic transitions? Also, I want to avoid spurious activations due to
    noise.

    Thanks,
    Bob Monsen
     
  2. <snip>

    If you really need speed (micsoseconds and below), the transistors must be
    HF (at least some common RF amp transistors) and a quick-acting photodiode
    would also be needed, but since 60ms is quite a big chunk of time, any
    transistor and any photodiode (maybe even photoresistor) will do. 60ms is
    not really a speed concern, just don't place big caps where they do not
    belong. A small cap between points A and B in your schematic might even help
    to get rid of RF static, spikes from relays switching motors on and off and
    this like. Since your environment is very noisy (a 220V motor switching off
    at an inappropriate phase angle can easily put out several kV spikes over a
    several MHz spectrum depending on the motor power), I think that a 100k
    resistor in a diff amp is way too high. Unless there is a small cap across
    it, it will pick up all RF static there is and the device will trigger on
    every relay click if not well shielded. (Maybe this was a little
    exaggerated, but since I've seen what a noisy environment 380-to-6000 volt
    5kW transformers create especially when switched off and how 'reliably'
    nearby electronic appliances perform, I can only recommend you to care as
    much as possible about inductive loads.) Basically I think your circuit
    should be OK, but please try not to use high resistances near motors or
    transformers whenever you can. Also please note that RF-shunting the
    photodiode and maybe also the PIC-input with small caps (will require some
    testing) to clear everything above some 10kHz could help make the device a
    little more reliable in respect to a noisy environment.

    Note: If there are only small low-voltage low-power motors, the warnings
    above may (and will likely) not apply.

    Dimitrij
     
  3. Luhan Monat

    Luhan Monat Guest

    Robert, how about this.

    Put a PIC12F675 (8-pins with 10 bit a/d), mount it right at the
    photodiode to and read the analog voltage (you need one pull-up resitor).

    Feed 5 volts (the pic will run on less) down a 3-wire cable
    (power,ground,data), and look for whatever type of signal you care to
    send back (level, or serial data).

    This pic costs about $2 in single quantities. The wire will probably
    cost you more.
     
  4. Thanks, Luhan. I'll look into that. There are 16 sensors spread over a
    fairly big area, so I'm looking for a cheap, reliable solution, like a
    discrete transistor or two.

    I'm really just looking for a trigger pulse from the remote sensor.

    Regards,
    Bob Monsen
     
  5. Luhan Monat

    Luhan Monat Guest

    Hi,

    Given this additional information, I would recommend a three-wire
    connection to each sensor (+5, ground, signal). To improve immunity to
    noise over the distance, here are some suggestions.

    1) Use dual conductor shielded cable from the pic to the sensors.

    2) Put something like a 2n2222 (npn) transistor connected as a 'voltage
    follower' at each sensor to boost the current.

    3) Use an r/c filter to radically filter each line comming into the pic.

    Given that you have 16 signals, the pic16f870 may be suitable. Use a
    pair of CD4051 (analog gates) to feed 2 of the a/d inputs. Use the same
    3 lines from the pic to addess both cd4051's at the same time.

    You may also be successful in just using 2 wires to each sensor, putting
    one load resistor at the common lead from each 4051, and filtering the
    heck out of the signal between the 4051 and the a/d inputs. This
    assumes that you do not need rapid readings. Use the time to allow
    radical filtering.
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-