Connect with us

? about LCR meter

Discussion in 'Electronic Equipment' started by Dave, Jun 30, 2005.

Scroll to continue with content
  1. Dave

    Dave Guest

    I am apparently more out of touch than I realized, and need someone in the
    know to please answer a dumb question for me. If an LCR meter with the
    lowest range of L is 20mH has a 3-1/2 digit display, does this mean it will
    display down to 1 microhenry? I'm thinking that it would display .001 in
    the range for mH's, which should be 1 microhenry. Does this sound right to
    anyone out there who uses such a device? Your help is appreciated.

    Dave
     
  2. Robert Baer

    Robert Baer Guest

    3-1/2 digit max on a 20mH scale would be 19.99mH, so if one looks
    *only* at digits, then the least significant digit is 10uH, *BUT* the
    best accuracy one can expect is +/- one digit, making a reading of
    0.01mH virtually meaningless.
     
  3. Dave

    Dave Guest

    Gotcha. Many thanks.

    Dave
     
  4. John Miles

    John Miles Guest

    I wouldn't count on it without checking with the manufacturer. The
    '1/2' digit is for the 0 or 1 needed in the most-significant digit, but
    you'll need one more digit to the left of the decimal point for the
    0?.00 or 1?.00 place. That leaves you with only two full digits to the
    right of the decimal point.

    For measurement in that range, I'm aware of only one affordable LCR
    meter (really, LC meter) that's useful -- the L/C Meter IIB sold by
    www.aade.com . Resolution is one nanohenry or ten femtofarads.

    -- jm
     
  5. Dave

    Dave Guest

    Wow. Too cool. I need one of those...

    One NANOhenry. Is this really meaningful? how does it get around stray
    inductance etc?

    Thanks for the ref. I'm really going to check this out.

    Much thanks,

    Dave
     
  6. John Miles

    John Miles Guest

    There's a zero button; to measure L, you short the test leads, zero it,
    then try to connect the unknown inductor without moving the leads around
    too much. It actually works pretty well in practice, although the 1-nH
    LSD isn't exactly repeatable with normal test leads.

    Same for C, only you zero the meter with the leads open.

    Some people have built their own test jigs to eliminate the instability
    caused by the leads, but I haven't had the need to do that, myself. The
    meter itself is stable enough to take advantage of its own resolution,
    which is really saying something.

    Obviously the accuracy is much less than the resolution, but for sorting
    or tweaking parts, that's fine.
    Note that it doesn't work on caps bigger than 1 uF, or inductors that
    get extremely lossy at frequencies in the hundreds of kHz. It's more of
    an RF-grade complement to the high-range LCR functions on DMMs than a
    replacement.

    -- jm
     
Ask a Question
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
Electronics Point Logo
Continue to site
Quote of the day

-