Maker Pro
Maker Pro

A Purely-Electronic Brain -- Possible?

B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]

If folks 'wonder', working in Physics
is how I 'recharge my batteries' [since
a Child.]

It's a 'good' strategy because it 'shifts'
mind's focus, enabling 'different' TD
E/I-minimization with respect to stuff
that's gotten 'boring' because one's
pushed-so-much-energy with respect
to it.

Folks can try-out this "strategy" by
reading the Isaacson book to see
for themselves the benefits of the
cognitive-straqtegy.

All of Life is like this.

You know -- "range widely" :-]

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]

| I want to briefly discuss [once again]
| Einstein's conceptualization of his "Equiv-
| alency Principle", a pillar of General Rel-
| ativity. [I worked all of this stuff out 'dec-
| ades' ago, but I'm going to use the pace
| of Mr. Issacson's Book to "meter-out"
| what will be my discussion -- be-cause
| the Book provides an excellent 'time'-line
| with respect to which to do so, and, well,
| it's the Book I'm reading :-]
|
| The Equivalency Principle holds that
| there's no way to distinguish between
| "gravitational mass" and "inertial mass",
| but this's not True, and it =matters=.
|
| "Inertial mass" is correlated to accel-
| erations.
|
| All accelerations require energy-'ex-
| penditure'.

Consider the "elevator" thought exper-
iment that Einstein did, in which a man
was in a "box without windows" that was
accelerated 'upward' by an attached rope.
[Analogous 'boxes' include space ships
on take-off and, =partially=, you in your
car, pulling away from a stoplight -- as
you are pressed-back into your seat.
Such accelerating dynamics are =ubiq-
uitous= during routine experience. The
"hair cells" of the "semicircular cannals",
for instance, translate accelerations
experienced by your head and body into
effector activations that're coordinated to
maintain your body's posture. [Which,
when one knows the neural Topology, is,
BTW, all the information one needs to
Reify 'gravity' as an energy-'consuming'
dynamic :-]

| So all one has to do to See the 'dif-
| ference' between "inertial mass" and
| "gravitational mass" is to 'view the
| energy gauge', which maps "inertial
| mass" into WDB2T, Rigorously.

In your car, just watch your 'fancy' 'instant-
aneous-fuel-flow gauge. When it goes
up or down, you're accelerating, posi-
tively or negatively, respectively.

In the spaceship, same-old, same-old.

With respect to semicircular-cannal
dynamics, one can use Myographic
Array Diagnosis [MAD] equipment to
detect the net muscle activations that
occur, as above, to maintain body-pos-
ture [with respect to which it ["of course"]
helps to have electrode-arrays mon-
itoring neural activation emmanating
from the semicircular cannals.]

The muscular, so activated, literally im-
parts accelerations to one's body that
maintain, say, the body in a "standing"
position. One can do a lot of Physics
using such a set-up. For instance, one
can map the "wind" because 'the' mus-
culature will be differentially-activated --
'the' body differentially-accelerated with
respect to accelerations inherent in
the "wind". [Nervous systems contin-
uously 'resolve' myriad such Problems
that are of infinitely-large scope, in this
case be-cause the "wind" can vary in
acceleration [velocity and direction]
continuously.]

| Which allows one to recurse back in-
| to the original "equivalency", Seeing
| that what's been referred to as "grav-
| ity" =must=, itself, be an energy-'con-
| suming' dynamic that also has to map-
| into WDB2T, be-cause, since "gravita-
| tional mass" and "inertial mass"
| are indistinguishable with respect to
| =motion=, and, since, as above, it's
| easy to See that "inertial mass" [accel- <-edited
| erations] =require[...]= energy-'expend-
| iture', if 'gravitational mass' 'did not'
| require energy-expenditure, =then= it
| would be 'different' from "inertial mass",
| and that'd 'mean' that the =motion=
| 'due to' 'gravity' would be 'free', relative
| to motion due to energy-'expenditure'-
| driven accelerations -- which dis-
| closes that there's something, in-
| the-mix, that's not properly Reified.
|
| Understand?
|
| Same motion.
|
| In the "inertial" case, requiring en-
| ergy-'expenditure'.
|
| In the "gravitational" case, "not re-
| quiring" energy-'expenditure'.
|
| But it's the =same= motion.
|
| So it cannot be that the same thing
| 'requires' energy-'expenditure' just
| 'because' of the reference-frame in
| which it occurs [Galilean Relativity
| demonstrates that the "laws of phys-
| ics" are the same regardless of
| frame of reference.]
|
| I'd Proven it in other ways,

How and why I first Reified all of this,
'decades' ago [mid-1970s], was in Rei-
fying how and why "biological mass"
[the microscopic trophic ["growth"] mod-
ifications ["micro-mods"] that are literally
empowered by the neural activation that
actually occurs 'within' nervous systems,
and which constitute the physical sub-
strate for "memory" and "learning", in turn
exert inertial-'force' 'within' neural dynamics
so as to actualize "memory" and "learning"
during the course of subsequent neural-
activation dynamics.

Understand?

The micro-mods literally constitute a
biological instantiation of inertial mass,
which inertial mass is 'encountered' 'with-
in' the 3D-Energydynamics [3D-E] that un-
derpin nerual activation dynamics, there-
by 'steering' neural activation dynamics
in ways that;re literally Directed in accord-
with the micro-mods that've formed dur-
ing the course of prior experience [=all=
of this stuff being, as has been discussed
in AoK all alogn, Deterministically-guided
by TD E/I-minimization, be-cause the
special topological homeomorphism is
"blue-printed" in 'the' "genome" by evolu-
tionary dynamics that are Deterministic-
ally-guided by WDB2T.]

Nervous systems =really= Know Physics,
and assert such Knowledge Magnificantly.

| and I've
| discussed the fundamentals of it's
| resolution in prior posts in this thread,
| and in other long-ago posts here in
| b.n and elsewhere, but, what's been
| referred to a "gravity" is an energy-
| 'consuming' dynamic.
|
| It's the =only= way to preserve "Equiv-
| alency" and Galilean Relativity, which
| have been right-there, plain-to-See,
| all along.
|
| Q. E. D. [again.]
| [...]

See what I Saw back in the mid-1970s?

All of the neural stuff that I've discussed
above [and everything else that occurs
'within' nervous systems] is =energy-
'consuming'=.

So everything that occurs 'within' nervous
systems, as in =all= of their interactions
with the rest of physical reality [with re-
spect to "external" physical reality] require
energy-'consumption'.

So, after having worked-out how and why
'all' of this happens 'within' nervous sys-
tems, it was apparent to me that "the rest"
of physical reality =must= be 'just' more
of the same-stuff -- everything empowered
by the one-way flowing of energy, from
order to disorder, that is what's =described=
by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T.]

So I rewrote all of Physics in accord with
such, reducing =everything= to the =one=
thing, WDB2T.

The "gravitational" 'vs.' "inertial" mass stuff
was one of the early things so reified be-
cause, as above, I saw that the only way
to maintain "equivalency" and Galilean Rel-
ativity was by Seeing that they =both= de-
rive in energy-'consumption' -- which they
=must= be-cause nervous system function
interfaces with 'gravity' in =Infinite= ways,
with respect to any and all of which there
exist no 'discontinuities' in which 'non-en-
ergy-'consuming'-'gravity' ' "can exist".

Understand?

There exist no 'cracks' between what's
been referred to as "gravity" and the In-
finite ways in which nervous system
function interfaces with 'gravity' -- so, if
the Infinity 'within' =always= requires en-
ergy-'consumption', the =only= way in
which 'gravity', which also acts in Infinite
ways, can act in the common physical
reality in which nervous systems act is
iff 'gravity' is an energy-'consuming' dyn-
amic.

The ancient 'way' of 'seeing' what's been
referred to as "gravity" was to 'assert'
that it "occurred as a property of mass" --
a "force" that's powerful enough to, for
instance, enable Sun to "hold" Earth and
the other planets in their orbits.

Think about that with respect to just
Earth.

The mass of Earth is 5.974^24 Kg,
which mass is being =constantly= re-
directed by Sun's 'gravity'.

That's a =lot= of physically-real work,
'supposedly' being constantly done 'with-
out' any energy-'consumption' costs.

It didn't compute.

How and why could "gravitational" dyn-
amics occur 'without' energy-'consump-
tion' cost when "inertial" dynamics could
=only= occur =with= energy-'consump-
tion' costs?

Imagine a crane that hoists a wreaking-
ball.

The crane does so at an energy-'consump-
tion' cost that's easily monitored by just
watching the crane's fuel gauge.

Say the crane is being used to demolish
a previously-existing foundation so that
a new foundation can be constructed up-
on which a new structure will be construct-
ed.

"Rrrrroooaaarrrr..." the wreaking-ball goes
up.

"Ssswwwwiiiissshhhh..." the wreaking-ball
goes down, being accelerated from zero
by 32 feet-per-second-per-second by 'grav-
ity'.

It's a big foundation, so there's a lot of it to
demolish, and the crane operator has to
repeatedly stop working so the fuel truck
can resupply the crane with the energy it
will 'consume' as it continues being used
to do the work inherent in demolishing the
previously-'existing' foundation.

But 'gravity', 'supposedly', requires no such
refueling.

It, 'supposedly, 'sits-there' always ready to
do work for 'free' -- just because it's there
as a 'property of mass'.

It doesn't compute.

Two =completely= intermingled Infinities.

One 'in' which, energy-'consumption' is
=always= required, the other 'in' which
energy-'consumption' is not only not-
'allowed', but 'in' which energy-'consump-
tion' is 'outlawed'.

Yet, they're =completely= intermingled.

So, as has been declared in AoK all along,
since I Saw that neural dynamics occur in
a way [via TD E/I-minimization] that yields
the =Illusion= of "attraction", but which is
obviously 'just' 3D-E being Directed to flow
in 'the' anti-WDB2T Direction, I used what
I'd learned while reifying nervous system
function to explore energy-'consuming'
ways of instantiating the same-stuff as
'gravity', which simultaneously Eliminated
=all= 'discontinuous' energy-flows -- the
WDB2T-'maintained' SSW<->UES harmon-
ics that I discussed earlier in this thread,
in which there's an energy-flow differential,
resulting from the physically-real work that
the UES does in its 'sustenance' of the ex-
istences of 'atoms', which is what that which
has been referred to as "gravity" physically
is.

"Matter" 'just' "rides" this energy-flow differen-
tial, which, be-cause it arises with respect
to =every= 'atom', is, therefore, rigorously-
correlated to the existence of "matter" [e.g.,
"a property of matter"], and which is cum-
ulatively aggregated with respect to aglom-
erations of "matter" -- the more "matter",
the greater is the energy-flow differential
on a line between agglomerations of "mat-
ter", and the greater the "tendency" for "mat-
ter" to move in this energy-flow differential
on a line between agglomerated "matter".

What's been referred to as "mass" falls
right out of the above be-cause it is the
3D-energy-flow differential that arises
in the WDB2T-'sustenance' of SSW<->UES
harmonics [what have been referred to as
"atoms"] that determines an 'atom's inter-
activity with its energy-surround [with its
local UES]. [Which is actually what Phys-
icists at CERN's LHC will 'discover' if they
'presume' to have 'discovered' the so-called
"Higgs boson" :-] [There was a fairly-good
diagram of the "clustering of the Higgs
field" that's actually 'just' the stuff I've dis-
cussed with respect to the WDB2T-Determ-
ined action of the UES on SSW<->UES
harmonics as I've been discussing it here
in b.n over the course of the past ~17 'years'.
The diagram was in an article entitled "A
Giant Takes On Physics' Biggest Questions",
by D. Overbye, p. D1, =The New York Times=,
Tuesday, 5/15/2007 [rated 40 "big-grins", a
record for a Newspaper Article I've read.]

Understand?

What's been referred to as "mass" is =just=
a =Continuous= energy-flow dynamic that
derives in the =Continuous=, WDB2T-Determ-
ined energy-flow differential above.

All there is within physical reality is energy
flowing in rigorous accord with WDB2T.

When, in some catastrophic creation violence,
more energy is 'contained within' a volume
than can escape from that 'containment' be-
cause it's easier for energy to flow inward
that it is to flow outward in the SSW<->UES
compression<->expansion harmonics, an
'atom' corresponding to the quantity of energy
so 'contained' is instantiated. The energy-
'containment' dynamics inherent in the in-
stantiation of 'atoms' also give rise to the
energy-content-dependent absorbtion and
emission "line spectra", which are =just=
energy flowing into into, and out of, the
SSW<->UES compression<->expansion
harmonics as the harmonics exist at var-
ious spherical-radii. [One can See the
compressions and expansions in the var-
ious "series" of the "line spectra", although,
in the case of heavier elements, the harmon-
ics overlay.]

Aren't the "line spectra" indicative of 'there
being discrete packets of energy'?

Nope.

All there is is the =one= Continuous 3D-E
that =only= changes Direction, Continuously,
in rigorous accord with the SSW<->UES
harmonics stuff that I discussed both earl-
ier in this thread, and in much-more detail
[including a little QBASIC[tm] app that cal-
culates the fundamentals of all that's in-
herent [the "Compton Refraction" app.]]

All there is within physical reality is =waves=.

There're exactly-Zero 'particles'.

What've been considered to "be particles"
in accelerator experiments are 'just' the
=emission= phase 'portions' of the =Con-
tinuous= 3D-E, which constitute slightly-
more than =half= of what's =in= physical
reality -- the "absorption" phase Continu-
ous 3D-E =always= literally 'move away
from' observability -- be-cause the ab-
sorbtion-phase is always Directed =in-
to= the SSW<->UES harmonics.

"Charge", "matter" 'vs.' 'anti-matter', the
various energies in the Continuous 3D-E,
"momentum", "mass", "pressure", "weight",
"electro-magnetic"-ness, so-called "strong"
and "weak" 'forces', "radioactivity", the Per-
iodic Taple, the distribution of "isotopes"
and how and why they are 'stable' or 'unstable',
and =much more= [everything that I know
of -- all experimental results that I know of,
are already tightly-integrated, along the lines
of what I've discussed above, all =Unified=
and reduced to the =one= Continuous en-
ergy-flow that is WDB2T.

I did this work in Tapered Harmony in order
to Completely account for all of nervous sys-
tem function. When I've so-often discussed
the "3D-E" that occur 'within' nervous systems
[as when I reified how and why the activation
of 'the genome' is coupled to experience], I've
been discussing the Physics that was Reified
in Tapered Harmony 'decades' ago.

I did this work because I Love you, and want-
ed to Free you from what's been "man's in-
humanity to man."

Which makes 'the rest' pretty-funny.

Forgive me, Please, for Loving you enough
to Honor Truth in your electronic-'presence'.

I can handle what's transpired. I understood,
all along, that it would, and Chose to do
what Needed to be done, "Anyway."

You know?

It's =not= the 'B. S.' that happens that matters.

It's what folks do, =despite= the 'B. S.' that
happens, that matters.

Choose Love.

You'll get 'bounced-around', a bit.

But you'll =matter=.

And, so-mattering, you'll make the world a
better place for its Children.

For our Children.

For the Future.

Choose Love.

Anyway, there're much-more-efficient ways
in which to work than by posting discussions
in NewsGroups.

Will such ways ever become Open to me?

In some quiet place, where folks Love Science.

Where work, done, can be shared, in-detail,
diagrams, computer programs, Maths, and
all.

Where folks're not 'afraid' of Truth.

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]

| The micro-mods literally constitute a
| biological instantiation of inertial mass,
| which inertial mass is 'encountered' 'with-
| in' the 3D-Energydynamics [3D-E] that un-
| derpin nerual activation dynamics, there-
| by 'steering' neural activation dynamics
| in ways that;re literally Directed in accord-
| with the micro-mods that've formed dur-
| ing the course of prior experience [=all=
| of this stuff being, as has been discussed
| in AoK all alogn, Deterministically-guided
| by TD E/I-minimization, be-cause the
| special topological homeomorphism is
| "blue-printed" in 'the' "genome" by evolu-
| tionary dynamics that are Deterministic-
| ally-guided by WDB2T.]
|
| Nervous systems =really= Know Physics,
| and assert such Knowledge Magnificantly.
| [...]

Understand?

Nervous systems literally =use= the 3D-E
that I've been discussing with respect to
the SSW<->UES harmonics, energy-'con-
suming' 'gravity', and "the rest".

Nervous systems literally use the energy-
flow differentials of SSW<->UES harmonics.

It's functional because, as has been discussed
in AoK, Ap1 all along, nervous systems
literally corral Infinity -- 'move'-infinitely 'with-
in' Infinity, literally grasping 'just'-energy, and
=using= it in their information-processing
dynamics -- literally Directing the 'movements'
of 'ions', 'atoms', and 'molecules' by literally
Directing the flow of 'just'-energy.

So, once one understands nervous system
function, one can do Physics as nervous
systems do Physics.

Which is informative.

k. p. collins
 
E

Entertained by my own EIMC

Jan 1, 1970
0
Where folks're not 'afraid' of Truth.

What would be the specific characteristics of a state "where folks're not
'afraid'" of _the implicitly relevant meaning_ of "Truth"?

You yourself (together with most others) do not and most likely will never
know and understand the answer to this leading question to do with certain
*relevant and rationally arrived at* aspects of "Truth" (or of What Is - was
and will be - going on).

P.S.

I have not just offered only you an opportunity (and/or jeopardizing your
irrationally deluded/inEPTly AEVASIVE worldview - although I have tactfully
provided a safety-net, or a safe way out, in the form of decEPTively puerile
and punny products in the form of philosophical profoundities packaged in
poo-humored profanities) by putting uniquely unifying EPT (e.g. 'extentded
primal theoretical') percEPTions of What Is going on onto electronic paper
in reply-posts to what you have written. %-|

A to me far more intensely insidious tragic tangle of examplifying
psychology/token target (than you), of the kind of insidious insanity that I
have been both perversely attacking and grasping by way of my etymologically
pioneering terminology and explanatory philosophical thesis, is Glen
Sizemore.
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]

| Imagine a crane that hoists a wreaking-
| ball.
|
| The crane does so at an energy-'consump-
| tion' cost that's easily monitored by just
| watching the crane's fuel gauge.
|
| Say the crane is being used to demolish
| a previously-existing foundation so that
| a new foundation can be constructed up-
| on which a new structure will be construct-
| ed.
|
| "Rrrrroooaaarrrr..." the wreaking-ball goes
| up.
|
| "Ssswwwwiiiissshhhh..." the wreaking-ball
| goes down, being accelerated from zero
| by 32 feet-per-second-per-second by 'grav-
| ity'.
| [...]

In the 'gravity' case, "where's the heat?"

It's easiest to see it on macroscopic scales,
like when it blew the top of Mount Saint Hel-
ens ~27 'years' ago.

Understand?

The heat is in earthquakes, tsunamis, plate
tectonics, Earth-sub-surface moltenness,
Earth-corre temperature, Mount Aetna's
recurrent erruptions [you know -- "the vol-
cano's crater" :-]

In Sun's radiation, including in the so-called
'nuclear' fusion that empowers it [and all the
stars, too], which "radiation" is 'just' the energy
in "matter" =flowing=, Continuously, in Rigor-
ous accord with WDB2T.

As the energy of "matter" so flows, the Universe
expands, also in Rigorous accord with WDB2T.

And the so-called "cosmic background rad-
iation" is literally WDB2T's 'fuel-gauge' reading.

The macroscopic cases of "heat" due to energy-
'consuming'-'gravity' are easy to See.

Microscopic cases are somewhat more-dif-
ificult to observe be-cause mechanical proc-
esses mask the heat corresponding to en-
ergy-'consuming'-'gravitational' dynamics.

And, so, the "heat" released in energy-'con-
suming'-'gravitational' dynamics has been
attributed to other stuff in macroscopic cases,
and just overlooked in microscopic cases.

The long-observed cooling-on-expansion
of gasses, which then absorb heat to re-
attain 'equilibrium' temp, and vice versa,
are 'intermediate' cases that can be oper-
ated-upon, at various relative starting pres-
sures, with temp being allowed to reach
'equilibrium', to extract a 'fuzzy' value for
the "heat"-of-'gravity'.

Understand?

Semi-evacuate a starting volume of gas,
let it reach 'equilibrium' temp, then either
increase or decrease the volume [which,
of course, requires calibration with re-
spect to the 'friction' that routinely occurs
in the apparatus -- which "calibration" is
hard to accomplish be-cause gas at var-
ious starting pressures will impose dif-
fering 'frictional' loads 'within' the appar-
atus -- which is =some= of why the early
[pre-experimental-cleverness-in-refining-
the-desing-for-the-apparatus] results
will be 'fuzzy'.

But there should be an observable "heat"-
variation that correlates to the starting-
pressure differentials. Which'll be a =start=
toward microscopic observation of the
"heat"-of-'gravitational' action [work=.]

All that's entailed is already commonly-
observed in many not-yet-routinely-unified
ways.

For instance, "superconductivity" and
"superfluidity" are both instances in
which, be-cause of the relative-energy-
flows imposed in extreme-cooling, the
net inward-outward energy-flows, rel-
ative to SSW<->UES harmonics is loc-
ally-'amplified' -- all in a way that's easy
to map into WDB2T when the =whole=
system is integrated [including the en-
ergy-'expenditure' required by the cool-
ing mechanism that's in the apparatus.]

Then there's the whole spectrum of ex-
periments that can be done using spher-
ically-inwardly-oriented lasers -- in this
case, taking a round-about route to ex-
periment on SSW<->UES harmonics, so
as to ascertain the inward-outward en-
ergy-flow differential that I've discussed
in prior posts, which Discloses the 'grav-
ity' stuff that I've been discussing in an
"implied" way.

Anyway, the "heat"-of-energy-'consuming'-
'gravity' has bee right-there in GR all along --
in the "mass"-increase that occurs aa c is
approached ["c" is a universal-'constant' be-
cause, as "mass" is accelerated toward c,
more energy just flows in any direction
=other than= the direction of acceleration,
and this flowing-elsewhere Continuous-
energy literally heats its local energy-sur-
round -- such flow is what "heat" physical-
ly is.

But all one actually has to do to Prove
energy-'consuming'-'gravity' is to see
Sun and the stars, and the way that
they're Continuously dumping-energy
throughout the Universe.

All such is the "heat"-of-energy-'con-
suming'-gravity -- all occurring in Rig-
orous accord with =one= thing: WDB2T.

I've no lab, so all I can do is work in the
ol' noggin lab.

| [There was a fairly-good
| diagram of the "clustering of the Higgs
| field" that's actually 'just' the stuff I've dis-
| cussed with respect to the WDB2T-Determ-
| ined action of the UES on SSW<->UES
| harmonics as I've been discussing it here
| in b.n over the course of the past ~17 'years'.
| The diagram was in an article entitled "A
| Giant Takes On Physics' Biggest Questions",
| by D. Overbye, p. D1, =The New York Times=,
| Tuesday, 5/15/2007 [rated 40 "big-grins", a
| record for a Newspaper Article I've read.]
| [...]

Since I've mentioned the LHC, I should re-
iterate a bit of what I've discussed in long-
former posts with respect to "encapsulation".

"Encapsulation" occurs when some relative
violence breaks-apart volumes of energy
that're 'normally' 'contained' by their surround-
ing energy [the UES].

Earlier in this thread, I "Celebrated!" a 'time'-
series of Hubble images of Supernova 1987a
that'd been Published in =Discover Magazine=.

I pointed out a cosmic-scale "encapsulation"
that was captured in-them.

The same-stuff happens at microscopic
scales 'within' so-called "particle accelerators"
and "coliders", like the LHC.

The disintegration fragments in accelerator
and collider set-ups exist, post-collision, only
to the degrees that their local UES can 'sus-
tain' their existences via "encapsulation".

The various fragmented "encapsulations" of
energy that have been referred to as "protons",
"neutrons", "electrons", etc., have 'independent'
existences outside of SSW<->UES harmonics
=only= to the degrees that the energy through
which they're accelerated instantiates at-energy-
level' "encapsulation" ['containment'], otherwise,
the corresponding quantities of energy exist
either in the UES or 'within' SSW<->UES com-
pression<->expansion harmonics that alter-
nate between "nucleation" and "shelling" sub-
phases. In the "nucleation" sub-phase, all of
the 'contained' energy is compressed 'within'
the radius of what's been referred to as 'the'
"nucleus". In the "shelling" sub-phase, the
'contained' energy is distributed in a spher-
ical "shell", which occurs because, as the
"expansion" phase occurs, the 'contained'
energy compresses the surrounding UES
to the degree that it becomes easier for the
'contained' energy to flow-inward than to
continue flowing-outward [which is how
and why 'containment' happens.]

Experimental results ["resonances", etc.]
that've been interpreted as substantiating
the 'existence' of so-called "quarks" are
actually artifactual with respect to the fact
that the "nucleation" sub-phase of the
harmonics is exceedingly-fleeting -- so
there's an =illusion= of there "being three
things" in-there -- be-cause, at existing
accelerator energies, that's all the energy-
probes that can "fit" into the "nucleation"
phase before it expands so much that
further energy-probes just pass-right-
through.

As I've discussed in earlier posts in this
thread, in between "nucleation" and "shelling"
maximums, there're the various "minor"-com-
pressions that correspond to the "line spec-
tra" of 'atoms' [and 'molecules'.]

What's been referred to as 'charge" cor-
relates to various in-phase conditions.

Zero-charge ["neutral"] stuff, for instance,
is always correlated with "compression"-
phase energy-'containment' sup-'atomic'-
energy-quantities [so-called "neutrons",
"neutrinos", K-zeros, xi-zeros, etc.]

When an 'atom' is "ionized", it just gives-
up, or picks-up, energy that's metered by
the primary quantity of energy that is 'con-
tained' in an SSW<->UES harmonic, which
"metering" accounts, completely, for the so-
called "mass of 'the' electron" [Millikan], for
instance, which "metering" occurs in ex-
actly the same way in which "ground-state"
'containment' occurs.

When energy is given-up, or picked-up, by
an SSW<->UES harmonic, the harmonics
alter in a way that also alters their natural
resonances with other SSW<->UES harm-
onics, which is what what's been referred
to as "charge" physically is -- when SSWs
'attract', it's be-cause their SSW<->UES
harmonics literally share the UES in a way
that =augments= their individual 'contain-
ment' dynamics, and vice versa with re-
spect to what's been referred to as "repul-
sion" -- SSW<->UES harmonics interfere
with each other's 'containment' dynamics,
which yields a net excess-energy-flow along
a line between the SSWs.

Tapered Harmony goes on and on like
this, everything in physical reality reduced
to the =one= thing -- the one-way flow of
energy, from order to disorder [from greater
to lesser density], that is what's =described=
by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T.]

Which energy-flow is Deterministically-
Continuous.

No "discrete particles".

Physical reality is 'just' waves.

The =only= thing that ever alters is energy-
flow-Directionality.

Which gives 'new' meaning to the notion
of "walking hand-in-hand" :-]

I understand that folks'll think, "Why begin
anew?", as Tapered Harmony does.

Not in the least, to Eliminate all so-called
"quantum weirdness", but, also, TH flat-
out makes undreamed-of stuff Possible,
like energy-abundance, along with a =lot=
of longed-for stuff, like Peace.

BTW, a "big-grin" is just a funny smiley-face
that I use, along with other symbols that're
meaningful to me, to "mark" stuff while I'm
reading -- so that I can "read the symbols"
later -- you know -- to find stuff to which I
want to refer-back-to again.

I do the same thing in-stream in my posts
here in b.n.

The "symbols" are not, themselves, "inform-
ation-containing" beyond their "back-reference"
purpose. They just point-back-to information-
content in ways that guide-my-eyes when I
want to reconsider something that I've read
or written] in the past. They're not especially-
consistent. They're just "markers"-to-inform-
ation-content. A "big-grin" in the margins of
somehting I'm reading usually indicates that
I've refified the stuff beyond the 'level' of what's
in the text. That's all.

[My machine is under-attack, which, in my
case, will Kill me -- because this is the
only way in which I can work.

So, to those who're doing such, =Please= don't.]

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
|
| |
| > Where folks're not 'afraid' of Truth.
|
| What would be the specific characteristics
| of a state "where folks're not 'afraid'" of _the
| implicitly relevant meaning_ of "Truth"?

When folks understand how and why
nervous systems process inform-
ation via 'blindly'-automated TD E/I-
minimization, and act upon what
they so-understand.

[Please refrain from theird-party references
in posts you address to me.]

k. p. collins
 
E

Entertained by my own EIMC

Jan 1, 1970
0
Benjamin said:
message
|
| |
| > Where folks're not 'afraid' of Truth.
|
| What would be the specific characteristics
| of a state "where folks're not 'afraid'" of _the
| implicitly relevant meaning_ of "Truth"?

When folks understand how and why
nervous systems process inform-
ation via 'blindly'-automated TD E/I-
minimization, and act upon what
they so-understand.

Therein essentially lies your delusion.

In neither sense of "lies" is it true to say that your delusion lies
deliberately.
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]

| I'm 'taking a break' from my routine partic-
| ipation here in b.n -- to "breath-in" for a
| change :-]
|
| Purchased some Books, both recently,
| and long-ago, and've been reading them.
|
| One of them is =Einstein=, by W. Isaac-
| son, which I'm finding to be Interesting
| and a well-done view on Dr. Einstein's
| Life and Work.
| [...]

The Book is well-done, but I'm not enjoy-
ing it as mush as I'd hoped -- because
it's purpose, it turns out, is to attend to
Einstein's human 'side', and his work
is treated from that perspective -- which,
since I've Lived-it, is 'painful' to me.

I enjoy Books that "fill-in" personal hist-
ories while focusing on the Science --
the historical context is as a "spoonful
of sugar that helps the [Science] go down."

But this personal history is a bit too
close to home for me -- folks 'think' that
Theorists are 'absent-minded' and 'in-
terpersonally-oblivious', but that's not
it.

Holding-previously-disconnected stuff
'together' in one's 'mind' is just pretty-
hard to do -- a lot of physically-real work.

So the Theorist has to choose between
doing that work and not doing that work
so he can do stuff that's interpersonal-
ly-expected [be-cause of group-wise
TD E/I-minimization dynamics, BTW.]

Theorists aren't 'oblivious' to interpers-
onal stuff -- they feel it all, just like ev-
eryone else does.

It's just that Theorists See stuff that
others don't [yet] See, and they give
themselves over to instantiating un-
derstanding with respect to what they
See -- so that what's 'disconnected'
can be =usefully= connected in ways
that enable Humanity's Progress.

Theorists take the Obligation, inher-
ent, Seriously, which is what leads
them to Choose to Devote themselves
to their work. So that the work will be
done.

Theorists aren't 'oblivious' to interpers-
onal stuff. They just Choose to 'balance'
their interpersonal stuff in ways that en-
able the doing of the work that they See
needs-doing.

So, for me, the Book is slow-going -- be-
cause it's recounting of Einstein's per-
sonal side is 'painful' to me.

"Yes, yes, yes! But the work =Needs=
to be accomplished! =After= what Needs
to be done is done, I can 'play.' "

But no one ever understands.

Folks just 'presume' the Theorist is
'strange' because he doesn't do every-
thing in the same way that they do things
in the context of interpersonal interactive
dynamics.

But the work Needs to be done.

Theorists feel the Loss inherent. They
just Choose between enduring that Loss
and doing the work that they See Needs
to be done.

Sadly, no one else understands, which
compounds the Loss -- and the 'pain'.

I'm still looking-forward, though, to the
Author's recounting of Einstein's resist-
ance to the 'quantum band-wagon' stuff.

I've not yet reached that 'stage' of the
Book, but that's what I want to [contin-
ue to] address in this post.

On p. 128, the Author quotes from Ein-
stein's 1905 Special Relativity Paper:

" 'The introduction of a 'light ether' will
prove to be superfluous, inasmuch as
the view to be developed here will not
require a 'space at absolute rest.' ' "

This's another 'point' at which things
in Science 'fell-off-the-handle' -- be-cause
what Einstein was =actually= Eliminat-
ing were the Newtonian concepts of
'absolute time' and 'absolute space',
which were contemporaneously at-
tributes in the way that the 'luminifer-
ous ether' was, then, viewed in Science --
an 'elastic-but-rigid' "ether" that per-
meated all space, in which "light"
traveled as waves [Newton believed
as "particles".]

Einstein's choice of words, in SR 1905
was unfortunate because, if one reads
elsewhere in Einstein's work, one sees
that Einstein =never= 'rejected' 'the ether'.

In his SR 1905 Paper, Einstein used the
language he used more with respect
to what he understood to be the then-
prevailing 'scientific' prejudice than he
did with respect to physical reality. He
was literally confronting the "old system"
in a deliberately-provocative way be-
cause he'd 'intuited' that such was nec-
essary with respect to counter-acting
the prevailing 'band-wagon'-itus [a 'dis-
ease' that routinely plagues Science
and those who 'do' it.]

It the passage quoted above, Einstein
wasn't rejecting an all-permeating med-
ium. He was Eliminating all notions of
'absolute time' and 'absolute space'.

=Big= Difference.

But, because he didn't distinguish, in
the language-interface dynamics that
he used in writing his Paper, between
a medium and the 'absolutes' he knew
he was Eliminating, his actual position
with respect to a medium, which he
affirmed all-along, following, 'got-lost',
and folks, not comprehending, threw-
out the medium with the never-actually-
existing 'absolutes'.

It's particularly-Sorrowful because what
Einstein should've done was Eliminate
non-physically-real 'time', reducing every-
thing to 'just'-energy, which is what's act-
ually in the Maths of Special [and General]
Relativity.

He, apparently, just didn't See this, prob-
ably be-cause Physics was, then, still in
it's Infancy with respect to experimental
methods, and, mostly, because he saw
that there was =something= really-Wrong
in then-prevailing 'notions' with respect to
physical reality, which 'notions' were, nev-
ertheless, strongly-coerced into the TD
E/I-minimization dynamics of Students',
and, therefore, Professionals, in Science.

Understand?

It wasn't the "medium" that Einstein saw
he needed to confront. It was 'scientific'-
prejudice, not yet reified, that induced
Einstein to use "confrontational" words --
words that he aimed directly at the 'heart'
of then-existing 'scientific'-prejudice.

It's particularly-Sorrowful because, as
I've reiterated [for the umpteenth time]
earlier in this thread, it's =easy= to See
that what's been referred to as "time" is
purel a mental-construct that's been
routinely used as an ordering-principle
with respect to the one-way-ness in-
herent in the flow of energy from order
to disorder that is what's =described=
by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T]. 'time' is a
verbal-symbolization =convenience=
with respect to ordering =language=
with respect to energy-flow.

Outside of the TD E/I-minimization
dynamics that occur 'within' nervous
systems, what's been referred to as
"time" has exactly-Zero physically-
real existence.

Throughout human History, folks've
been 'confused' with respect to 'time'
be-cause , since folks did not compre-
hend how and why nervous systems
process information via 'blindly'-auto-
mated TD E/I-minimization, folks
'blindly' and automatically attributed
what they could 'feel' in their nervous
systems' TD E/I-minimization dynamics
to =external= physical reality.

But doing such doesn't, somehow,
transform physical reality into what
TD E/I-minimization 'within' nervous
systems 'dictates' that 'physical real-
ity must be'.

Doing such 'just' 'blinds' folks to
physical reality.

Understand?

All of this matters, Greatly, because
what folks can =do= is 'determined'
in the TD E/I-minimizations that occur
'within' folks' nervous systems -- so,
if cognitive dynamics diverge from
Truth with respect to physical reality,
although physical reality does not
block what folks can do, TD E/I-min-
imization within nervous systems
does, in a virtual, but nevertheless,
'dictatorial' way that leaves folks be-
ing virtually-unable to do what phys-
ical reality, in fact, enables folks to do.

I expect that Dr. Einstein would've
grasped all of this, immediately, if
only the Neuroscience had, then,
been available to him.

Because, rewrite SR & GR to Eliminate
non-physically-real 'time', replacing it
with 3D-Energydynamics [3D-E], and
not only do they still do all that Einstein
saw in them, but =vast= 'new' capabili-
ties open-up to Science, and, through
Science, to Humanity.

Instead of calling the "ether", by which
he actually meant 'absolute time' and
'absolute space', not the medium, Ein-
stein should've just Eliminated 'time'
and let energy flow in accord with WDB2T.

He didn't because Science was, then,
not yet sufficiently-advanced to enable
him to, then, do so.

If he were 34 'today', I expect I'd not be
having to post this discussion.

He'd have seen as above.

It matters, Greatly, because the 3D-E
Reification Eliminates all so-called
"quantum weridness", Concretely re-
turning Physics to its long-embrace
with Deterministic-Causality, simul-
taneously enabling Humanity to do
the analogous thing -- to eschew Il-
logic within its interactive dynamics,
which is a 'stepping-stone' along the
Way to transcending what has been
"man's inhumanity to man."

So it matters-Greatly.

A further note: There's a Serious
Lesson, inherent, with respect to the
way that 'reliance' in Maths that's on-
ly-abstractly 'connected' to physical
reality leads down wrong paths.

The Maths of SR and GR do such be-
cause they include non-physically-real
'time', being forever Wrong as a result
of their doing so, but still exerting 'pow-
erful' force within Humanity's relative-
progress by inducing Humanity to 'move
away from' Truth.

Look back on the last 'century' and you'll
See, clearly, that, 'move away from' Truth,
and Truth 'moves away from' one, right-
back.

Truth =is=.

'move toward' Truth, and Truth 'moves
toward' one, right-back.

Which is how and why =anything=, and
=everything= matters.

[Use "matters" as a verb.]

[For those who've not been reading in
bionet.neuroscience over the 'years',
Truth is literally instantiated 'within'
nervous systems via the globally-inte-
grated TD E/I-minimization dynamics
that occur 'within' their special topolog-
ical homeomorphisms.

'move toward' Truth, and, over the rel-
atively-long-term, TD E/I-minimization
occurs within your nervous system.

Not, and not.

=Always=.

Be-cause nervous systems are Determ-
inistically-coupled to WDB2T all the way
down to 'just'-energy.

"Range widely'"

While "looking-elsewhere."

Testing-everything that's so-experienced,
with respect to everything that's been,
"thus far", experienced.

Nervous systems can innately do such,
even though they most-often 'choose'
to do-less than such [AoK, Ap7.]]

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| | > message
| > | > |
| > | | > |
| > | > Where folks're not 'afraid' of Truth.
| > |
| > | What would be the specific characteristics
| > | of a state "where folks're not 'afraid'" of _the
| > | implicitly relevant meaning_ of "Truth"?
| >
| > When folks understand how and why
| > nervous systems process inform-
| > ation via 'blindly'-automated TD E/I-
| > minimization, and act upon what
| > they so-understand.
|
| Therein essentially lies your delusion.
|
| In neither sense of "lies" is it true to say
| that your delusion lies deliberately.

What you still don't seem to understand,
Peter, is that I'm not you, and that, there-
fore, we each understand some stuff
that the other does not, yet, understand.

I can only speak with respect to what I
understand, not what you understand.

But I understand that, given understand-
ing, nervous systems act-upon such,
always.

When the understanding so-given is
with respect to how and why nervous
systems process information via
'blindly'-automated TD E/I-minimization,
folks simultaneously understand what
'fear' physically is, how and why it arises
with respect to absence-of-understand-
ing, and how and why the thing to do is
to 'move' in Directions that gather-in the
understanding that's absent.

Since you've never actually said what's
in that which you assert I'm "lying"
about, I can only 'hypothesize' with re-
sepct to such.

'perhaps' you assert that People are
'irredeemably-bad', and that, no mat-
ter what "understanding" is given to
folks, folks'll remain 'irredeemably-
bad', take 'the understanding' [nev-
er =the understanding=, but that's
another 'ball-of-wax'], and do 'bad'
stuff, anyway.

I've had a lot of experience on the re-
ceiving-end of such, so I understand
how and why such occurs.

It's 'just' that Truth =is=, Peter.

Truth does what it does =regardless=
of what anybody does.

So folks who 'move away from' Truth
will find that Truth 'moves away from'
them, right-back.

It's not =me= who 'determines' any-
thing.

I just 'move toward' Truth.

Period.

Truth takes-care of 'the rest', and,
in the context of out present discus-
sion, folks'll find that Truth is True :-]

In other words, as far as humans are
concerned, Truth is rigorously-Determ-
ined by the one-way flow of energy,
from order to disorder, that is what's
=described= by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T.]

Check it out, and you'll See that Hum-
anity's current juxtaposition with respect
to its own non-Survival, because of glob-
al-warming, is =pure= WDB2T.

=Everything= else is the same-stuff, too.

Give folks understanding with respect
to global-warming, and folks choose
to do what Needs to be done with re-
spect to Humanity's Survival.

Understanding with respect to how and
why nervous systems process inform-
ation, same-old, same-old, only in a
completely-generalized way with re-
spect to =all= Possible human exper-
ience.

Even with respect to what's been our
'interaction' over the 'years'.

Be-cause, 'move toward' Truth, and
Truth 'moves toward' one, right-back.

Not, and not.

Never-failingly.

Be-cause, WDB2T.

Cheers, Peter,

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]

| Instead of calling the "ether", by which
| he actually meant 'absolute time' and
| 'absolute space', not the medium, ["sup- <- edited
| erfluous"] Einstein should've just Elimin-
| ated 'time' and let energy flow in accord
| with WDB2T.
| [...]

Sorry. The 'missing' word matters.

k. p. collins
 
E

Entertained by my own EIMC

Jan 1, 1970
0
Benjamin said:
message
| | > message
| > | > |
| > | | > |
| > | > Where folks're not 'afraid' of Truth.
| > |
| > | What would be the specific characteristics
| > | of a state "where folks're not 'afraid'" of _the
| > | implicitly relevant meaning_ of "Truth"?
| >
| > When folks understand how and why
| > nervous systems process inform-
| > ation via 'blindly'-automated TD E/I-
| > minimization, and act upon what
| > they so-understand.
|
| Therein essentially lies your delusion.
|
| In neither sense of "lies" is it true to say
| that your delusion lies deliberately.

What you still don't seem to understand,
Peter, is that I'm not you, and that, there-
fore, we each understand some stuff
that the other does not, yet, understand.

I can only speak with respect to what I
understand, not what you understand.

But I understand that, given understand-
ing, nervous systems act-upon such,
always.

When the understanding so-given is
with respect to how and why nervous
systems process information via
'blindly'-automated TD E/I-minimization,
folks simultaneously understand what
'fear' physically is, how and why it arises
with respect to absence-of-understand-
ing, and how and why the thing to do is
to 'move' in Directions that gather-in the
understanding that's absent.

Since you've never actually said what's
in that which you assert I'm "lying"
about, I can only 'hypothesize' with re-
sepct to such.

I have said this 'aspect of Truth' but you have "'blindly'-automatically"
evaded 'seeing' it (hence avoided the potential effects - for better or for
worse - of the insights and other physiological ignitions (emotional and
visceral/vascular/hormonal effects) that would ensue if you had 'seen'.
'perhaps' you assert that People are
'irredeemably-bad', and that, no mat-
ter what "understanding" is given to
folks, folks'll remain 'irredeemably-
bad', take 'the understanding' [nev-
er =the understanding=, but that's
another 'ball-of-wax'], and do 'bad'
stuff, anyway.

Nothing of the sort!
It's 'just' that Truth =is=, Peter.

Truth does what it does =regardless=
of what anybody does.

Agree - without reservations.

I just 'move toward' Truth.

Period.

Door (certain synaptic gates of yours) slamming shut! ;-)
In other words, as far as humans are
concerned, Truth is rigorously-Determ-
ined by the one-way flow of energy,
from order to disorder, that is what's
=described= by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T.]

That is so not even wrong that I can not even refute it with a simple no.
Check it out, and you'll See that Hum-
anity's current juxtaposition with respect
to its own non-Survival, because of glob-
al-warming, is =pure= WDB2T.

=Everything= else is the same-stuff, too.

Give folks understanding with respect
to global-warming, and folks choose
to do what Needs to be done with re-
spect to Humanity's Survival.

Disagree likewise.
Understanding with respect to how and
why nervous systems process inform-
ation, same-old, same-old, only in a
completely-generalized way with re-
spect to =all= Possible human exper-
ience.

Even with respect to what's been our
'interaction' over the 'years'.

Be-cause, 'move toward' Truth, and
Truth 'moves toward' one, right-back.

Not, and not.

Never-failingly.

Be-cause, WDB2T.

You are intellectually so close (have had much relevant talent) to, yet are
so far from from, heuristically finding out about and learning to
'effectively philosophy terminatingly' handle, this 'psychologically hot
potatoe'.

P
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]

It's getting-old, Peter.

Do you think that I do not under-
stand why you, and others, hurl
'accusations'?

But it's =funny= how a phrase
that's appeared in the 'news'
ramifies, as it did in your post.

Just goes to show what's lost
in the 'silence' re. NDT's stuff.

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]

| I'm still looking-forward, though, to the
| Author's recounting of Einstein's resist-
| ance to the 'quantum band-wagon' stuff.
| [...]

Got "there" just this 'night' [p. 320->]

Wearing out a pen drawing big-grin-
smiley-faces :-]

All the 'problems' were resolved long-
ago in TH.

Folks who've read the discussions
I've been posting in this thread should
be able to See how and why that's so.

Am Enjoying the Book, now.

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]

I hope the 'silence' on b.n is indicative
of folks coming to understand.

Or am I just clone-servered again?

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| || [...]
|
|| Instead of calling the "ether", by which
|| he actually meant 'absolute time' and
|| 'absolute space', not the medium, ["sup- <- edited
|| erfluous"] Einstein should've just Elimin-
|| ated 'time' and let energy flow in accord
|| with WDB2T.
|| [...]
| [...]

With respect to the above, here's a
Prediction:

Folks at LHC will find evidence sub-
stantiating super-asymmetry, rather
than so-called "super-symmetry".

Super-asymmetry derives in the fact
that WDB2T permeates and Determ-
ines everything within physical reality.

Understand?

If 'you' don't, go-back and reread the
discussions that I've posted in this
thread [and in all of my long-former
discussions of Tapered Harmony]
which trace WDB2T through all known
experimental results.

The super-asymmetry is Determined
in the one-way-ness of WDB2T, in-
cluding [along with everything else
in physical reality :-] energy-'consum-
ing' 'gravity', and Life's 'moving' in the
anti-WDB2T Direction, which is pow-
ered in a way that's closely-analogous
to energy-'consuming' 'gravity' -- be-
cause they both reduce to the SSW<->
UES compression<->expansion
harmonics [Spherical-Standing-Waves
<->Universal-Energy-Supply compres-
sion<->expansion harmonics, which
are 'like' de Broglie's "standing waves"
in "wave mechanics", but =spherical=
nonlinear compression<->expansion
'volume'-waves that alternate, =Contin-
uously=, between max-compression
["nucleation"] and max-expansion
["shelling"] in a way that's Determined
by the quantity of energy that's 'con-
tained within' the 'instantaneous'
spherical volume and the local UES
density. Sub-'stable-containment'
quantities of energy can instantiate
temporary-'containments' that 'wink-
out' as the energy 'contained-within'
them 'leaks' back into the energy-
surround [the UES] be-cause the
'contained' energy is insufficient to
instantiate stable-'containment'. Such
sub-'stable-containment' dynamics
occur routinely in =all= accelerator
experiments, in which it's the imposed
acceleration energy that instantiates
the the degree of the temporary sub-
'stable-containment' energy-"encaps-
ulations" that are what experimenters
have viewed as "constituting" so-called
"particles" -- because collisions be
tween SSW<->UES harmonics over-
whelm their on-going energy-'contain-
ment' dynamics, dis-inetgrating the
SSW<->UES harmonics, releasing the
formerly-'contained' energy, which "rams"
into the local energy-surround, which
temporarily "encapsulates" the released
energy in ways that =always= have ster-
eotypical Geometries relative to the overall
energy-density ambient 'within' the accel-
erator apparatus.

Understand this last stuff?

It means that the 'types' of so-called
"particles" that can be observed can be
=Continuously= altered by altering the
ambient energy-density 'within' the ac-
celerator, which is an =easy= way to
Verify [to "Test"] all of Tapered Harmony,
which Verification will simultaneously
calibrate the nonlinearities discussed
above [the relationship between energy-
quantity and 'containment', which is ex-
tremely-rich, and extremely-telling, be-
cause it includes =all= of what've been
refered to as "the four forces", all of which,
as I briefly discussed earlier in this thread,
reduce directly to the =one= thing --
WDB2T, always super-asymmetrically,
be-cause of the one-way-energy-flow-
ness that is WDB2T. The super-asym-
metry, inherent, is what makes the Ver-
ification easy be-cause it's =always=
right-there to observe. [Be-cause it's
in WDB2T, no matter =what= one looks-
at, one Sees it [:-] like in the way that
Life =always= 'moves in the anti-WDB2T
Direction, for instance.]

Understand?

The =one= thing Determines =every-
thing' within physical reality, and it's
=all= Testable in practically =any= accel-
erator set-up, not 'only' LHC. [I've already
Verified all of this stuff in RHIC data, but
an set of accelerator experiments in
which net-accelerator-energy is linearly-
modulated [continuously] from some
arbitrary 'low' to the particular accelerat-
or's maximum =will= disclose all of the
SSW<->UES-harmonics stuff that I've
ever discussed, thus Confirming TH
to anyone's satisfaction. [I understand
that accelerators are engineered to op-
erate at specific energies, so convert-
ing an accelerator to operate at contin-
uously-variable energies requires some
re-engineering. A way to approach this
engineered-in circumstance is to =com-
bine= [cross-correlate] experimental re-
sults from accelerators that're already
engineered to operate at various ener-
gies. Each will yield stereotypical ob-
servables. Cross-correlate these with
the energy-'levels' at which specific
accelerators operate. Doing this will
be a little like creating a so-called
"single photon" interference pattern,
but it'll be possible to "interpolate" the
overall continuous-nonlinearity. This'll
give folks sufficient reason to do the
necessary re-engineering to an exist-
ing accelerator [why not Fermilab's
Tevatron, which is due to go off-line
in 2010(?), anyway?]

I Hope that accelerator Physicists will
do this continuous-energy-modulation
experiment as soon as is practically-
possible, because, then, folks can be-
gin to reap the benefits that're in TH's
Unification of Physics, which will yield
profound advances in =every= field of
Science, not in the least, because TH
opens-up 'new' sources of energy that
are a =bit= like the "flux-capacitor" in the
=Back to the Future= movies :-]

I'm not 'kidding' [I do have some "fun"
in the discussions I post, but I =never=
'move away from' Truth [even though
my giving stuff to folks has 'always'
been 'rewarded' by my being more-
virtually-imprisoned the more I so-
Give :-[

I =long-ago= [1975-6 academic 'year']
Proved everything I've ever discussed
with respect to the SSW<->UES harm-
onics while Reifying nervous system
function -- by just 'reading' 'the' "brain",
and what occurs 'within' it [of course by
studying the experimental results pro-
duced by Neuroscientists.] I've been
working to communicate all of this
stuff to folks in b.n, all along. It's been
'Difficult' to do so because I had to
'work-around' [with respect to] the fact
that folks were previously-aware of the
False-finitization that holds that there're
'electrons orbiting a nucleus' in 'atoms',
which concept completely-'blinds' folks
to the more-than-half of physical reality
that's comprised of 'just'-energy flowing
in rigorous accord with WDB2T [which
is why I've 'had to' hammer so hard on
fundamental-'level' stuff -- folks'd not
be able to comprehend higher-'level'
stuff be-cause, until folks're able to un-
derstand the basics of TH, the old,
long-'familiar' False-finitization of 'dis-
crete-particle atoms' 'blinds' folks to
all of the stuff that TH Discloses [which
higher-'level' stuff I've not even been
'able' to begin to discuss -- because
folks'd've not been 'able' to understand
it if I did, =not= 'because' folks 'cannot',
but be-cause the old, long-'familiar'
stuff exists as "biological mass" in
folks' nervous systems, there exerting
physical inertia 'within' folks' cognitive
dynamics, thereby literally Directing
folks' cognitive dynamics to 'move
away from' TH's SSW<->UES harmon-
ics stuff -- which simultaneously 'moves'
folks' cognitive dynamics 'away from'
being 'able' to See "the rest" [even
though the =only= thing involved is
with respect to what's in, and not-in,
folks prior experience -- =not= in any-
thing that's innate 'within' folks' 'norm-
al' nervous systems.]

Understand?

All of this matters be-cause the 'just'-
energy stuff enables Infinite uses that
have not, yet, been actualized outside
of NDT and TH, not in the least, all of
the stuff that nervous systems routinely
do with respect to, for instance, all of
the Infinities [AoK, Ap1] with which
nervous systems routinely, more or
less, cope in real-'time', which, with NDT
and TH, is all flat-out easy to understand.]

How and why all of this matters most is
with respect to lifting Humanity up above
what's been "man's inhumanity to man."

Folks 'should' understand that the ex-
istences of NDT and TH do not 'end'
anything. They just instantiate a 'new'
=Beginning=.

There'll be =plenty= of work to do in Sci-
ence =for as long as= folks want to do
Science -- be-cause it's =Infinite= -- and I
Hope folks'll "roll up their sleeves", and
get-along with doing what Needs to be
done.

For Peace-across-Humanity.

For the Children.

For not 'only' the Survival of Humanity,
but the =Prospering= of Humanity.

You know -- for the Future.

[I 'apologize' that this post is ineloquently-
written [and not checked for syntax of
'spqlling', but I've got to go cut my elder-
ly-Neighbors' lawns, then I've got to go
to the Cemetery -- it's my Mam and Dad's
Aniversary today -- so I'll clean-it-up later,
if it needs-it.]

k. p. collins
 
Top