| [...]
| I want to briefly discuss [once again]
| Einstein's conceptualization of his "Equiv-
| alency Principle", a pillar of General Rel-
| ativity. [I worked all of this stuff out 'dec-
| ades' ago, but I'm going to use the pace
| of Mr. Issacson's Book to "meter-out"
| what will be my discussion -- be-cause
| the Book provides an excellent 'time'-line
| with respect to which to do so, and, well,
| it's the Book I'm reading :-]
|
| The Equivalency Principle holds that
| there's no way to distinguish between
| "gravitational mass" and "inertial mass",
| but this's not True, and it =matters=.
|
| "Inertial mass" is correlated to accel-
| erations.
|
| All accelerations require energy-'ex-
| penditure'.
Consider the "elevator" thought exper-
iment that Einstein did, in which a man
was in a "box without windows" that was
accelerated 'upward' by an attached rope.
[Analogous 'boxes' include space ships
on take-off and, =partially=, you in your
car, pulling away from a stoplight -- as
you are pressed-back into your seat.
Such accelerating dynamics are =ubiq-
uitous= during routine experience. The
"hair cells" of the "semicircular cannals",
for instance, translate accelerations
experienced by your head and body into
effector activations that're coordinated to
maintain your body's posture. [Which,
when one knows the neural Topology, is,
BTW, all the information one needs to
Reify 'gravity' as an energy-'consuming'
dynamic :-]
| So all one has to do to See the 'dif-
| ference' between "inertial mass" and
| "gravitational mass" is to 'view the
| energy gauge', which maps "inertial
| mass" into WDB2T, Rigorously.
In your car, just watch your 'fancy' 'instant-
aneous-fuel-flow gauge. When it goes
up or down, you're accelerating, posi-
tively or negatively, respectively.
In the spaceship, same-old, same-old.
With respect to semicircular-cannal
dynamics, one can use Myographic
Array Diagnosis [MAD] equipment to
detect the net muscle activations that
occur, as above, to maintain body-pos-
ture [with respect to which it ["of course"]
helps to have electrode-arrays mon-
itoring neural activation emmanating
from the semicircular cannals.]
The muscular, so activated, literally im-
parts accelerations to one's body that
maintain, say, the body in a "standing"
position. One can do a lot of Physics
using such a set-up. For instance, one
can map the "wind" because 'the' mus-
culature will be differentially-activated --
'the' body differentially-accelerated with
respect to accelerations inherent in
the "wind". [Nervous systems contin-
uously 'resolve' myriad such Problems
that are of infinitely-large scope, in this
case be-cause the "wind" can vary in
acceleration [velocity and direction]
continuously.]
| Which allows one to recurse back in-
| to the original "equivalency", Seeing
| that what's been referred to as "grav-
| ity" =must=, itself, be an energy-'con-
| suming' dynamic that also has to map-
| into WDB2T, be-cause, since "gravita-
| tional mass" and "inertial mass"
| are indistinguishable with respect to
| =motion=, and, since, as above, it's
| easy to See that "inertial mass" [accel- <-edited
| erations] =require[...]= energy-'expend-
| iture', if 'gravitational mass' 'did not'
| require energy-expenditure, =then= it
| would be 'different' from "inertial mass",
| and that'd 'mean' that the =motion=
| 'due to' 'gravity' would be 'free', relative
| to motion due to energy-'expenditure'-
| driven accelerations -- which dis-
| closes that there's something, in-
| the-mix, that's not properly Reified.
|
| Understand?
|
| Same motion.
|
| In the "inertial" case, requiring en-
| ergy-'expenditure'.
|
| In the "gravitational" case, "not re-
| quiring" energy-'expenditure'.
|
| But it's the =same= motion.
|
| So it cannot be that the same thing
| 'requires' energy-'expenditure' just
| 'because' of the reference-frame in
| which it occurs [Galilean Relativity
| demonstrates that the "laws of phys-
| ics" are the same regardless of
| frame of reference.]
|
| I'd Proven it in other ways,
How and why I first Reified all of this,
'decades' ago [mid-1970s], was in Rei-
fying how and why "biological mass"
[the microscopic trophic ["growth"] mod-
ifications ["micro-mods"] that are literally
empowered by the neural activation that
actually occurs 'within' nervous systems,
and which constitute the physical sub-
strate for "memory" and "learning", in turn
exert inertial-'force' 'within' neural dynamics
so as to actualize "memory" and "learning"
during the course of subsequent neural-
activation dynamics.
Understand?
The micro-mods literally constitute a
biological instantiation of inertial mass,
which inertial mass is 'encountered' 'with-
in' the 3D-Energydynamics [3D-E] that un-
derpin nerual activation dynamics, there-
by 'steering' neural activation dynamics
in ways that;re literally Directed in accord-
with the micro-mods that've formed dur-
ing the course of prior experience [=all=
of this stuff being, as has been discussed
in AoK all alogn, Deterministically-guided
by TD E/I-minimization, be-cause the
special topological homeomorphism is
"blue-printed" in 'the' "genome" by evolu-
tionary dynamics that are Deterministic-
ally-guided by WDB2T.]
Nervous systems =really= Know Physics,
and assert such Knowledge Magnificantly.
| and I've
| discussed the fundamentals of it's
| resolution in prior posts in this thread,
| and in other long-ago posts here in
| b.n and elsewhere, but, what's been
| referred to a "gravity" is an energy-
| 'consuming' dynamic.
|
| It's the =only= way to preserve "Equiv-
| alency" and Galilean Relativity, which
| have been right-there, plain-to-See,
| all along.
|
| Q. E. D. [again.]
| [...]
See what I Saw back in the mid-1970s?
All of the neural stuff that I've discussed
above [and everything else that occurs
'within' nervous systems] is =energy-
'consuming'=.
So everything that occurs 'within' nervous
systems, as in =all= of their interactions
with the rest of physical reality [with re-
spect to "external" physical reality] require
energy-'consumption'.
So, after having worked-out how and why
'all' of this happens 'within' nervous sys-
tems, it was apparent to me that "the rest"
of physical reality =must= be 'just' more
of the same-stuff -- everything empowered
by the one-way flowing of energy, from
order to disorder, that is what's =described=
by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T.]
So I rewrote all of Physics in accord with
such, reducing =everything= to the =one=
thing, WDB2T.
The "gravitational" 'vs.' "inertial" mass stuff
was one of the early things so reified be-
cause, as above, I saw that the only way
to maintain "equivalency" and Galilean Rel-
ativity was by Seeing that they =both= de-
rive in energy-'consumption' -- which they
=must= be-cause nervous system function
interfaces with 'gravity' in =Infinite= ways,
with respect to any and all of which there
exist no 'discontinuities' in which 'non-en-
ergy-'consuming'-'gravity' ' "can exist".
Understand?
There exist no 'cracks' between what's
been referred to as "gravity" and the In-
finite ways in which nervous system
function interfaces with 'gravity' -- so, if
the Infinity 'within' =always= requires en-
ergy-'consumption', the =only= way in
which 'gravity', which also acts in Infinite
ways, can act in the common physical
reality in which nervous systems act is
iff 'gravity' is an energy-'consuming' dyn-
amic.
The ancient 'way' of 'seeing' what's been
referred to as "gravity" was to 'assert'
that it "occurred as a property of mass" --
a "force" that's powerful enough to, for
instance, enable Sun to "hold" Earth and
the other planets in their orbits.
Think about that with respect to just
Earth.
The mass of Earth is 5.974^24 Kg,
which mass is being =constantly= re-
directed by Sun's 'gravity'.
That's a =lot= of physically-real work,
'supposedly' being constantly done 'with-
out' any energy-'consumption' costs.
It didn't compute.
How and why could "gravitational" dyn-
amics occur 'without' energy-'consump-
tion' cost when "inertial" dynamics could
=only= occur =with= energy-'consump-
tion' costs?
Imagine a crane that hoists a wreaking-
ball.
The crane does so at an energy-'consump-
tion' cost that's easily monitored by just
watching the crane's fuel gauge.
Say the crane is being used to demolish
a previously-existing foundation so that
a new foundation can be constructed up-
on which a new structure will be construct-
ed.
"Rrrrroooaaarrrr..." the wreaking-ball goes
up.
"Ssswwwwiiiissshhhh..." the wreaking-ball
goes down, being accelerated from zero
by 32 feet-per-second-per-second by 'grav-
ity'.
It's a big foundation, so there's a lot of it to
demolish, and the crane operator has to
repeatedly stop working so the fuel truck
can resupply the crane with the energy it
will 'consume' as it continues being used
to do the work inherent in demolishing the
previously-'existing' foundation.
But 'gravity', 'supposedly', requires no such
refueling.
It, 'supposedly, 'sits-there' always ready to
do work for 'free' -- just because it's there
as a 'property of mass'.
It doesn't compute.
Two =completely= intermingled Infinities.
One 'in' which, energy-'consumption' is
=always= required, the other 'in' which
energy-'consumption' is not only not-
'allowed', but 'in' which energy-'consump-
tion' is 'outlawed'.
Yet, they're =completely= intermingled.
So, as has been declared in AoK all along,
since I Saw that neural dynamics occur in
a way [via TD E/I-minimization] that yields
the =Illusion= of "attraction", but which is
obviously 'just' 3D-E being Directed to flow
in 'the' anti-WDB2T Direction, I used what
I'd learned while reifying nervous system
function to explore energy-'consuming'
ways of instantiating the same-stuff as
'gravity', which simultaneously Eliminated
=all= 'discontinuous' energy-flows -- the
WDB2T-'maintained' SSW<->UES harmon-
ics that I discussed earlier in this thread,
in which there's an energy-flow differential,
resulting from the physically-real work that
the UES does in its 'sustenance' of the ex-
istences of 'atoms', which is what that which
has been referred to as "gravity" physically
is.
"Matter" 'just' "rides" this energy-flow differen-
tial, which, be-cause it arises with respect
to =every= 'atom', is, therefore, rigorously-
correlated to the existence of "matter" [e.g.,
"a property of matter"], and which is cum-
ulatively aggregated with respect to aglom-
erations of "matter" -- the more "matter",
the greater is the energy-flow differential
on a line between agglomerations of "mat-
ter", and the greater the "tendency" for "mat-
ter" to move in this energy-flow differential
on a line between agglomerated "matter".
What's been referred to as "mass" falls
right out of the above be-cause it is the
3D-energy-flow differential that arises
in the WDB2T-'sustenance' of SSW<->UES
harmonics [what have been referred to as
"atoms"] that determines an 'atom's inter-
activity with its energy-surround [with its
local UES]. [Which is actually what Phys-
icists at CERN's LHC will 'discover' if they
'presume' to have 'discovered' the so-called
"Higgs boson" :-] [There was a fairly-good
diagram of the "clustering of the Higgs
field" that's actually 'just' the stuff I've dis-
cussed with respect to the WDB2T-Determ-
ined action of the UES on SSW<->UES
harmonics as I've been discussing it here
in b.n over the course of the past ~17 'years'.
The diagram was in an article entitled "A
Giant Takes On Physics' Biggest Questions",
by D. Overbye, p. D1, =The New York Times=,
Tuesday, 5/15/2007 [rated 40 "big-grins", a
record for a Newspaper Article I've read.]
Understand?
What's been referred to as "mass" is =just=
a =Continuous= energy-flow dynamic that
derives in the =Continuous=, WDB2T-Determ-
ined energy-flow differential above.
All there is within physical reality is energy
flowing in rigorous accord with WDB2T.
When, in some catastrophic creation violence,
more energy is 'contained within' a volume
than can escape from that 'containment' be-
cause it's easier for energy to flow inward
that it is to flow outward in the SSW<->UES
compression<->expansion harmonics, an
'atom' corresponding to the quantity of energy
so 'contained' is instantiated. The energy-
'containment' dynamics inherent in the in-
stantiation of 'atoms' also give rise to the
energy-content-dependent absorbtion and
emission "line spectra", which are =just=
energy flowing into into, and out of, the
SSW<->UES compression<->expansion
harmonics as the harmonics exist at var-
ious spherical-radii. [One can See the
compressions and expansions in the var-
ious "series" of the "line spectra", although,
in the case of heavier elements, the harmon-
ics overlay.]
Aren't the "line spectra" indicative of 'there
being discrete packets of energy'?
Nope.
All there is is the =one= Continuous 3D-E
that =only= changes Direction, Continuously,
in rigorous accord with the SSW<->UES
harmonics stuff that I discussed both earl-
ier in this thread, and in much-more detail
[including a little QBASIC[tm] app that cal-
culates the fundamentals of all that's in-
herent [the "Compton Refraction" app.]]
All there is within physical reality is =waves=.
There're exactly-Zero 'particles'.
What've been considered to "be particles"
in accelerator experiments are 'just' the
=emission= phase 'portions' of the =Con-
tinuous= 3D-E, which constitute slightly-
more than =half= of what's =in= physical
reality -- the "absorption" phase Continu-
ous 3D-E =always= literally 'move away
from' observability -- be-cause the ab-
sorbtion-phase is always Directed =in-
to= the SSW<->UES harmonics.
"Charge", "matter" 'vs.' 'anti-matter', the
various energies in the Continuous 3D-E,
"momentum", "mass", "pressure", "weight",
"electro-magnetic"-ness, so-called "strong"
and "weak" 'forces', "radioactivity", the Per-
iodic Taple, the distribution of "isotopes"
and how and why they are 'stable' or 'unstable',
and =much more= [everything that I know
of -- all experimental results that I know of,
are already tightly-integrated, along the lines
of what I've discussed above, all =Unified=
and reduced to the =one= Continuous en-
ergy-flow that is WDB2T.
I did this work in Tapered Harmony in order
to Completely account for all of nervous sys-
tem function. When I've so-often discussed
the "3D-E" that occur 'within' nervous systems
[as when I reified how and why the activation
of 'the genome' is coupled to experience], I've
been discussing the Physics that was Reified
in Tapered Harmony 'decades' ago.
I did this work because I Love you, and want-
ed to Free you from what's been "man's in-
humanity to man."
Which makes 'the rest' pretty-funny.
Forgive me, Please, for Loving you enough
to Honor Truth in your electronic-'presence'.
I can handle what's transpired. I understood,
all along, that it would, and Chose to do
what Needed to be done, "Anyway."
You know?
It's =not= the 'B. S.' that happens that matters.
It's what folks do, =despite= the 'B. S.' that
happens, that matters.
Choose Love.
You'll get 'bounced-around', a bit.
But you'll =matter=.
And, so-mattering, you'll make the world a
better place for its Children.
For our Children.
For the Future.
Choose Love.
Anyway, there're much-more-efficient ways
in which to work than by posting discussions
in NewsGroups.
Will such ways ever become Open to me?
In some quiet place, where folks Love Science.
Where work, done, can be shared, in-detail,
diagrams, computer programs, Maths, and
all.
Where folks're not 'afraid' of Truth.
k. p. collins