Maker Pro
Maker Pro

A Purely-Electronic Brain -- Possible?

B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| || [...]
|| |||[...]
||| A Glia-Neural Theory of Brain Function
||| http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/47/1/129.pdf
||
|| "Ouch!"
|| [...]
|
| BTW, because I've got my browser
| screwed-down-tight, I couldn't DL
| the .PDF.
| [...]

I didn't access the other links.

'heart'-'questioning' be-cause of the
other post, but still aware that I've
got to maintain extreme-Discipline
with this 9th internet PC.

k. p. collins
 
T

tomhoo

Jan 1, 1970
0
Hi:

Will it ever be possible to make a purely-electronic brain that is
exactly like a human brain except that its uses purely-electric
signals instead of electrochemical ionic signals?

If so would this brain be able to link to actual human brain and
transmit/receive/process/record/playback electroneural signals?

Thanks,

Radium


I appologize for not reading this very long thread but thought I would
throw this thought in just in case it wasn't mentioned:

If you have a system of linear equations, you can turn them into a
analog computer circuit which is a bunch of wires, resisters and
gates. (I think you have to take a Laplace Xform to do this if I
remember....)

What is interesting is that for a forced response problem, the circuit
behaves in real time.

I always thought it would be neat if you had, say a 10 million DOF FEM
model, obtained the analog computer network, and then built a solid
stateone by burning a chip with a device not totally unlike an ink-jet
printer, powered it up, applied the inputs and measured your outputs.

I don't know what can be done with non-linear systems, but I suspect
they might also be Xformable.
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]
| || [...]
| [...]

| There's exactly-Zero 'quantum' =anything= <-edited
| within physical reality.
| [...]

I've explained it so many 'times' that doing
so, 'now', kind of like having to 'beg for my
life'.

And there is something like that -- but the
'life' I 'beg' for is the 'life' of Physics, not my
own -- be-cause, as things stand, Physics'
'belief' in Impossible 'infinities', which are
grouped together, usually with an "inverted"
[AoK, Ap4] 'pride', under the 'heading' of so-
called "quantum weirdness", has been 're-
sulting' in all of Humanity's 'moving away
from' Truth.

So there are actual Lives on whose behalfs
I =am= Begging for -- countless real Lives,
including every Person who reads this post.

This is the Spirit in which I've pursued the
work I've been sharing in bionet.neuroscience,
in which NG, =everything= necessary to Prove
the position that I'm discussing has been re-
peatedly reiterated.

In this post, I'll go over the extreme-basics
of the Difference between Tapered Harmony's
Continuous-3D-Energydynamics [3D-E] and
the so-called "quantum mechanical" 'discrete
particle' view, showing how and why the TH
Continuous-3D-E rigorously accounts for all
known experimental results while simultan-
eously eliminating =all= 'quantum weirdness'.

Although he was in-Error in his 1905 photo-
electric effect paper, Einstein was Correct,
to the end of his Life, in the Courageous
stand he encapsulated in saying, "God
does not play with dice" -- in which Ein-
stein was asserting that 'randomness' ex-
plains nothing, and that any system that
incorporates 'randomness' is False to the
degree that it does so.

It's flat-out-easy to See that, in so saying,
Einstein was, and still is, Correct, be-cause,
if it actually had any physically-real existence,
the information-content of "randomness" is
exactly-Zero [which is the =same= "exactly-
Zero" that I asserted in what I've quoted
from my earlier post, above.]

The way that 'randomness' is in the 'heart'
of 'quantum mechanics' reflects the Error
inherent in the 'presumption' that, 'at micro-
scopic scales', energy 'is exchanged via
discrete particles', so-called "quanta of en-
ergy".

This Error dates back to 1900 when folks
in Physics had come-up-hard against the
so-called "ultraviolet catastrophe" pertaining
to the prediction of infinite-energy in the
Rayleigh-Jeans theoretical position with
respect to power-at-radiation-frequency.

It was observed that, in a "black body" set-
up, rather than heading-off to infinity, as
Rayleigh-Jeans had predicted, as TempK
is continuously-increased, power drops
back to Zero, in stereotypically-replicable
ways, as frequency increases in an un-
bounded way -- beyond this power-drop-
off, the most-significant other thing being
that, as TempK increases, the maximum-
power-peak of the net black-body radiation
shifts toward the high-frequency 'end' of
the black-body power-spectrum.

The 'difference' between the Rayleigh-Jeans
prediction with respect to radiated-power-at-
frequency and what was routinely observed
in black-body experimental set-ups is what
has been referred to as the "ultraviolet cat-
astrophe", which provoked late-19th-'century'
Physics to enter a problem-solving 'frenzy',
out of which came Max Planck's famous
'resolution' of the 'ultraviolet catastrophe'.

Planck converged upon his result via em-
pirical methods that, at first, even he was
skeptical of. But as word of his result, and
the fact that it did yeild numerical values
that were relatively-close to the experiment-
ally-observed power-at-frequency-at-TempK
values of black bodies, folks began to in-
terpret the 'constant' that Planck had in-
cluded in his empirical calculation as 'say-
ing something' "about physical reality".

And that's where almost-all of Physics [with
the notable exception of Albert Einstein]
'flew-off-the-handle', and, while there are
many analogous Errors that've long-endur-
ed during the History of Science, I know of
nothing that is as Sorrow-Filled as has
been the 'feeding-frenzy' which ensued
Planck's Erroneous-'guess'.

It's Sorrowfully-'hilarious', 'two', because
the Infinity predicted by Rayleigh-Jeans
was right-there, plain-to-see, in the black
body experimental results, and, subseq-
uently, in the agreed-upon relationship
between frequency and power. And, when
Einstein wrote his 1905 "Special Relativ-
aty" paper, the Infinity was right-there,
plain-to-see, too, but, by 'then', 'modern'-
Pysics had 'flown' completely 'off-the-handle,
and the 'die-was-cast' with respect to what
has been a ~100-'year' sojourn in a desert
of absence-of-understanding with respect
to physical reality.

Just-'now', I'm hungry. I'll continue the dis-
cussion after I find something to eat.

k. p. collins
 
J

Jerry Avins

Jan 1, 1970
0
Benjamin wrote:

...
Just-'now', I'm hungry. I'll continue the dis-
cussion after I find something to eat.

Please don't. At least not in comp.dsp.

Jerry
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| || [...]
|| ||| [...]
|| [...]
|
|| There's exactly-Zero 'quantum' =anything= <-edited
|| within physical reality.
|| [...]
| [...]

| It's Sorrowfully-'hilarious', 'two', because
| the Infinity predicted by Rayleigh-Jeans
| was right-there, plain-to-see, in the black
| body experimental results, and, subseq-
| uently, in the agreed-upon relationship
| between frequency and power. And, when
| Einstein wrote his 1905 "Special Relativ-
| aty" paper, the Infinity was right-there,
| plain-to-see, too, but, by 'then', 'modern'-
| Pysics had 'flown' completely 'off-the-handle,
| and the 'die-was-cast' with respect to what
| has been a ~100-'year' sojourn in a desert
| of absence-of-understanding with respect
| to physical reality.
| [...]

Imagined reply:

"Ken, Ken, the black body power spectrum
has been verified to be a commonplace
phenomenon throughout the universe. For
goodness sakes, our own sun radiates as
a black body!"

Yup, and yup.

Releigh-Jeans just got the =whole= black-
body power-spectrum mixed-up with 'atom-
ic'-radiation-power -- even though the idea
that everything 'within' physical reality is
comprised of 'indivisible atoms' was already
'millenia'-old.

Because, when one distinguishes betwen
the whole black-body-power-specturm and
the radiating-powers of 'individual-atoms',
the infinity predicted in Raleigh-Jeans is
right-there, plain-to-see in the observed
black-body experimental results -- because,
if the 'containment' vessel used in a black-
body experiment did not melt-down and
vaporize as TempK was increased =without-
bounds=, as TempK increases =without-
bounds=, greatest-frequency emitted from
the black-body would also increase =with-
out-bounds=.

The 'infinite'-power is 'in' the 'individual-atom'
consideration, not in the whole-black-body-
power-spectrum consideration.

But, if TempK could, infact, be increased
without-bounds, =all= instances of black-
body experiments point Directly to the fact
that 'atomic'-radiation-frequency would
also 'increase without-bounds'.

And, since it's long been verified that the
power of radiated EM occurs as a function
of frequency, if TempK could be increased
without-bounds, frequency would increase
without-bounds, hence radiated-EM-power
would increase without-bounds.

So the Raleigh-Jeans prediction was cor-
rect except that it just didn't integrate the
already-then-known fact that TempK can
=never= be increased without bounds, be-
cause all matter vaporizes at it's Temper
ature-of-vaporization.

But, instead of working on =this= "excep-
tion", which is clearly the thing that need-
ed to be explained, folks 'decided' to pur-
sue 'fitting' everything to Planck's Erron-
eous empirical calculation -- 'because',
after all, the =curves= it produced do
look like the data-plots from actual black-
body experiments. The Maths 'replaced'
the Doing-of-Physics, and, because 'ran-
domness' does, in fact, exactly-Zero in-
formation, it is, in fact, Possible to invoke
'randomness' in an Infinite variety of 'ways'
to 'explain' =anything=.

The 'only' Problem is that, to the degree
to which 'randomness' is incorporated
'within' a Problem-'resolution', the inform-
ation-content of the Problem-'resolution'
is also exactly-Zero.

Imagined reply:

"Ken, Ken, quantum mechanics has pro-
duced vast numbers of correct problem
resolutions. All of the modern electron-
ics, and devices that they have made
possible, like the computer you are
writing this tripe upon. It's what you are
writing that has 'exactly-zero' information
content."

"Harrumph!"

:-]

I didn't say that there has been no con-
vergence. There, of course, has been.

It's 'just' that the convergence that has
occurred has =nothing= to do with so-
called "quantized energy", and =every-
thing= to do with the fact that the con-
vergence that has occurred has occurred
be-cause of the TD E/I-minimization that's
occurred 'within' the nervous systems of
the folks who were 'curve-fitting' exper-
imental results to calculations that have
been 'founded'-in 'randomness', which,
as above, because they are 'founded'-in
'randomness' can be produced in Infinite
varieties, all of which have exactly-Zero
information-content with respect to =phys-
ical reality=, except that, yes, the calcul-
ations did, in fact, occur 'within' the phys-
ical real neural dynamics of nervous sys-
tems [in modern 'days', usually with the
assistance of computational devices.]

The Problem inherent in the above has
been that, absent-understanding with
respect to how and why nervous systems
process in-formation via 'blindly'-automat-
ed TD E/I-minimization [which I'm not go-
ing to formally address in this thread, but
which I've been discussing in b.n over
the course of more than 15 'years'], nerv-
ous systems tend, strongly, to converge-
upon Problem-'resolutions' that merely
'take-the-mean' correlating to that which
has driven the neural dynamics that have
actually occurred 'within' them as a result
of the external-experiential-environments
that Individuals have experienced.

So, if =any= group of folks experiences
relatively-exclusively 'within' a relatively-
closed group, the nervous systems of
the 'members' of that group will tend,
strongly, to converge-upon 'agreement'
with respect to =whatever= is commonly-
occurring 'within' what has been their
group-wise experience -- which can be
=anything=, as long as the 'majority' of
the 'members' of the group behave rel-
atively-in-accord-with =whatever= "it" is.

And that's exactly what happend as folks
in Physics converged into groupwise-in-
teractive dynamics with respect to Planck's
Erroneous empirical result 'with respect
to' the black-body power-spectrum, flying-
off-the-handle with respect to physical
reality, as a group -- 'because' "after all",
they were 'calculating' everything that
they agreed upon. In 'modern' 'days', all
of this has literally become entrenched
as a result of the hijacking of 'science' in
the name of 'national security' -- which
has literally coerced folks who want to
do Science into extraordinarily-cloister-
ed group-wise interactive dynamics.

Why does all of this matter?

To begin to understand that, return to the
impossibility of increasing TempK with-
out bounds in a black-body [or in anything
else within physical reality.]

I'll post this, and continue the discussion
in a follow-up.

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| Benjamin wrote:
|
| ...
|
| > Just-'now', I'm hungry. I'll continue the dis-
| > cussion after I find something to eat.
|
| Please don't. At least not in comp.dsp.
|
| Jerry
| --
| Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

Hey, it wasn't me who started the cross-posting.

"Engineering is the art of making what you want
from things you can get."

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| || ||| [...]
||| |||| [...]
||| [...]
||
||| There's exactly-Zero 'quantum' =anything= <-edited
||| within physical reality.
||| [...]
|| [...]
| [...]

| And that's exactly what happend as folks
| in Physics converged into groupwise-in-
| teractive dynamics with respect to Planck's
| Erroneous empirical result 'with respect
| to' the black-body power-spectrum, flying-
| off-the-handle with respect to physical
| reality, as a group -- 'because' "after all",
| they were 'calculating' everything that
| they agreed upon. In 'modern' 'days', all
| of this has literally become entrenched
| as a result of the hijacking of 'science' in
| the name of 'national security' -- which
| has literally coerced folks who want to
| do Science into extraordinarily-cloister-
| ed group-wise interactive dynamics.
|
| Why does all of this matter?
|
| To begin to understand that, return to the
| impossibility of increasing TempK with-
| out bounds in a black-body [or in anything
| else within physical reality.]
| [...]

Saying that "heat-of-vaporization" is a "prop-
erty of an isotope" doesn't say anything
about how and why it's so, and it's how and
why it's so that matters, in particular, with
respect to Physis' having 'flown-off-the-
handle' in the aftermath of the "ultraviolet
catastrophe's" being encountered in the
late-19th-'century'.

'statistical mechanics' and 'thermodynamics'
[which, to date, have both literally embodied
the mean-seeking stuff that I discussed in
my preceding post, doing so in empirical
ways that 'leave-it-at-that' without actually ex-
plaining how and why it's so] view the "vapor-
ization" that is always observed as TempK is
increased 'without-limit' as occurring as a
consequence of 'atoms' exhibiting "vibration"
that increases in both frequency and intens-
ity as TempK is increased, and that 'atoms'
and 'molecules' move with increasing vel-
ocities 'because' they 'bounce-off-of' one
another with increasing-intensity that derives
in the fact that they are "vibrating" relatively-
intensely, or, in the case of accelerator ex-
periments, because imparted-motion is
relatively-large in 'particle'-collisions.

But that doesn't say how and why 'atoms'
and 'molecules' 'vibrate more-intensely' as
TempK increases.

'quantum mechanics' views such increas-
ing-vibrational-intensity as 'being' the re-
sult of so-called "sub-atimic particles"
'jumping-between' so-called "energy lev-
els" 'within' 'atoms'.

'quantum mechanics' 'believes' in the 'ex-
istences' of such 'sub-atomic particles'
because, during the course of experiment-
ation, such as with respect to the photo-
electric effect, Compton 'scattering', 'atomic'-
spectrum-analyses, and in modern 'particle'-
accelerators, there's the =appearance= of
'there being hard, point-like, things within
the target media', that can 'jump-between-
levels' in 'atoms' [corresponding to the
"lines" in line-spectra", and/or be emitted-
by and/or absorbed-within other 'atoms'.

I long-ago worked-through =all= of the ex-
perimental results that were invoked in
ways that 'presumed' that energy 'is quant-
ized', reducing everything in all of them to
=Continuous= energy-flows, but I'll stick
with the black-body stuff in this discussion
because the Continuity-of-energy-flow in
it applies to all of the other experimental
results too -- and one might as well Cor-
rect an Error where the Error first occurred,
which was with respect to the ultraviolet
catastrophe in the late-19th-'century'.

Back in the early-20th-'century', what have
been referred to as "atoms" were viewed
as being 'little solar systems', largely on
the basis of the results of Compton's 'scat-
tering' experiments, in which it was 'pre-
sumed' that incident 'photons' resulted
in the deflection of 'electrons' that were
'orbiting' the 'much-heavier' 'nucleus' of
'atoms' in the target material.

During these experiments, however, it
was also observed that such 'deflections'
were =never= precisely-replicable, occur-
ing, instead, within stereotypically-occur-
ring =ranges= of 'deflection'-angles which
ranges, themselves, had stereotypically-
occurring angular-intensity-variations.

It was in attempts' to explain this observ-
ed 'flexibility' that so-called "randomness"
entered-into calculations that were, short-
ly thereafter, to form the 'foundation' of
what has become 'quantum mechanics'.

It was with respect to observed stuff like
this that Heisenberg posed his so-called
"uncertainty principle", which states that
position and momentum of a 'particle'
cannot be simultaneously-determined, so
stuff like the observed angular-intensity-
variance in the Compton 'scattering' re-
sults could be 'accounted' for.

'uncertainty' marked the beginning of
'quantum weirdness', =all= of which
actually resulted from the fact that folks
'presumed' that energy was 'quantized'
rather than flowing Continuously.

There's no 'easy' way to transition to the
Correct resolution, so I'll just 'jump' to
stating it :-]

That there =must= be =something=
that 'segregates' "matter" into relatively-
'discrete' 'atoms' is obvious in the fact
that there exist 'discrete' "elements",
which, although they can be mixed and
or compounded, can always be purified
again, but not 'purified' beyond their "el-
emental" 'states'. [Their elemental 'states'
can ["of course"] be temporarily 'broken-
down', as occurs in so-called 'nuclear'
"fissions" and "fusions", but the results
of such 'nuclear' reactions are different
elemental 'states' which will segregate
in accord with their newly-transitioned-
into elemental 'states' during 'normal'
chemical reactions.]

Don't the chemical and 'nuclear' dyn-
amics above "require" that there 'be
discrete stuff' that can be so 'mixed-
and-matched"? Because, after all,
although some of the above is relatively-
hard to accomplish, when it is accom-
plished, it routinely occurs in replicable
ways.

Nope.

Continuous flowing of 'just'-energy can,
and does, accomplish everything with-
in physical reality, all in a way that is
Rigorously-Verified by all known exper-
imental results -- the 'only' thing is that
seeing continuous-energy enables one
to do vastly-much-more than can be
accomplished if one 'restricts' what one
'sees' to so-called "discrete particles"
[not in the least, because seeing con-
tinuous-energy Eliminates =all= so-
called "quantum weirdness", in the
process, disclosing that 'quantum
weirdness' never did have any physic-
ally-real existence -- just as Einstein
asserted in his Courageous, Life-
long-unrelenting, stand -- even though
folks who'd jumped-onto the 'quantum'
band-wagon, 'forgetting' that he'd lit-
erally carried Physics forward on his
back, excorciated him 'just' as relent-
lessly.]

What have been referred to as "atoms"
are 'just' quantities of energy 'contained-
within' harmonic compression<->expan-
sion harmonic-interaction with a con-
tinuous energy-surround --

Spherical-Standing-Wave<->Universal-
Energy-Supply harmonics --

SSW<->UES harmonics.

'containment' happens be-cause, dur-
ing some creation violence -- as in a
supernova -- more energy is compressed
'within' a spherical volume of space than
can pass-through the surface-area of that
spherical volume without instantiating
a perpheral spherical 'shell' in which the
energy-pressure surpasses the energy-
pressure that the volume of 'contained'
energy can exert upon its energy-surround.

The main feature of SSW<->UES harmon-
ics is that their compression<->expan-
sion harmonics are nonlinearly-dynamic.

At max-compression, all of the energy is
'contained-within' a volume that is non-
linearly-small relative to the volume of
at max-expansion.

The nonlinearity varies both in volume
per unit 'time' and in 'time', =always=
reflecting the relative-actions of 'intern-
al' and 'external' continuous energy-
pressures.

The nonlinear dynamics exhibit a "U"-
shaped acceleration-curve, with max-
energy-redistribution-velocity 'always'
occurring 'in the middle', of the max-
compression and max-expansion 'states'

Because of the compression and expan-
sion, when other quantities of continuous
energy interact with such an 'atom', how
and why they will interact is completely-
Determined by the in-compression<->
expansion 'phase' of the harmonics.

When an SSW<->UES harmonic is in
a relatively-max-compression 'state',
it will 'appear-to-be' what has been re-
ferred to as an "atomic nucleus", and
it's interactions with 'incoming' energy
of sufficiently-high frequency to fit 'with-
in' the max-compression 'state' will be
commensurately 'point'-like "elastic".

When an SSW is in a relatively-max-
expansion 'state', which is, as above,
itself a "shelling"-compression, it will
'appear', to incoming continuous-energy
having commensurate-frequency 'to-be'
what have been referred to as an "elec-
tron", and experimental observations
will occur accordingly.

In-between max-compression and max-
expansion, analogous continuous-ener-
gy interactive-dynamics occur at relative-
frequencies that 'match' the degree of
compression or expansion that exists
when incident-continuous-energy inter-
acts with the SSW<->UES harmonic.

[Note that the "work functions" and "cut-
off-frequencies" observed in the photo-
electric effect are =Completely= Determ-
ined in the above.]

Also, because the Volume/Surface-Area
ratio of the 'contained' energy varies non-
linearly with compression/expansion
'phase, the 'containment' breaks-down
dynamically either allowing continuous-
energy-flow to be either 'out-of' or 'into'
the SSW<->UES harmonic. Hence the
various elemental "emission" and "ab-
sorption" "line spectra", which are com-
pletely-Determined by the max-expansion
quantity of energy 'contained-within' the
SSW<->UES harmonic -- which is how
and why the line spectra are uniquely-
correlated to the various elements.

Various quantities of energy so 'contained'
have the different properties of the known
elements be-cause their harmonic inter-
actions with their energy-surrounds is
Completely-Determined in their energy-
contents.

All of this happens via =continuous= en-
ergy-exchange between the 'contained'
energy and its energy-surround, and
all of this happens in =Exact=, Contin-
uous accord with the Continuous one-
way universal flowing of energy, from
order to disorder, that is what's =described=
by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T], which physically-
real Continuous energy-flow is what un-
derpins the observed expansion of the
Universe.

So-called "radioactivity" =does not= occur
in a 'random' way.

SSW<->UES harmonics dis-integrate
when, and to the degree that, their rel-
atively-local 'containing' UES-energy-
density decreases below that which is,
as above, required to 'maintain contain-
ment'.

When 'atomic' dis-integration, energy
is permanently 'released' from it's former
'containment', which bolsters the energy-
density of the surrounding UES, 'prevent-
ing' further local SSW<->UES did-inte-
grations, which, further, is how and why
'atomic'-dis-integration 'events' have the
=appearance= of 'being random'.

As the Universe continues its Continuous
overall expansion, relatively-more 'atomic'
dis-integrations will occur with respect to
particular elements that 'live-on-the-edge-
of-being-containable' at any 'point' during
the overall universal-expansion dynamics.

That's "the short story" on Tapered Harmony,
which is a "therory of everything" that occurs
within physical reality.

Tapered Harmony goes on and on, reduc-
ing everything to the SSW<->UES harmon-
ics that I've briefly discussed above. All ex-
perimental results that I know of are com-
pletely-integrated in TH -- and TH opens-
up an entire 'new-world' in which stuff
that has not even been conceived of before
is rendered flat-out Possible.

I've been discussing TH online over the
course of more than 15 'years', and al-
though, yes, I've received a lot of 'flak' for
doing so, I've =never= received a single
response with respect to anything that's
in TH in any specifically-negatively-crit-
ical way.

There'll =never= be any such stuff that can
be sustained -- be-cause, as is my routine
way, I Proved 100% of TH before I ever 'bo-
thered' anyone with it's stuff.

Albert Einstein was Correct in his Courageous
stand.

"God doesn't play at dice with the universe."

All there is is energy, flowing-Continuously,
Completely-Determined, everywhere within
physical reality, in which there is exactly-Zero
'quantum' anything.

'fire'-at-will, folks.

All that'll happen is that you'll learn TH.

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| || ||| |||| [...]
|||| ||||| [...]
|||| [...]
|||
|||| There's exactly-Zero 'quantum' =anything= <-edited
|||| within physical reality.
|||| [...]
||| [...]
|| [...]
| [...]

| When an SSW<->UES harmonic is in
| a relatively-max-compression 'state',
| it will 'appear-to-be' what has been re-
| ferred to as an "atomic nucleus", and
| it's interactions with 'incoming' energy
| of sufficiently-high frequency to fit 'with-
| in' the max-compression 'state' will be
| commensurately 'point'-like "elastic".
| [...]

The above also discolses that there ex-
ists no such thing as "the strong nuclear
force".

The above also explains why what's
been referred to as the "strong nuclear
force" =appears= to 'act' at only extremely-
short distances -- be-cause experiments
which have Erroneously been 'presumed'
to 'substantiate the existence of' 'the
strong nculear force' see 'only' that 'por-
tion' of the SSW<->UES harmonics that
occur at relatively-max-compression --
then the SSW expands and the probing-
energy 'just' passes-right-through -- be-
cause there's nothing in-there having
so-called "nuclear"-density.

For analogous reasons, there exists no
such thing as the so-called "weak-nuclear
force".

| All of this happens via =continuous= en-
| ergy-exchange between the 'contained'
| energy and its energy-surround, and
| all of this happens in =Exact=, Contin-
| uous accord with the Continuous one-
| way universal flowing of energy, from
| order to disorder, that is what's =described=
| by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T], which physically-
| real Continuous energy-flow is what un-
| derpins the observed expansion of the
| Universe.
| [...]

What's been referred to as "gravity" is also
not a 'discrete force'. 'gravity' occurs as a
function of the fact that the UES performs
physically-real work during its sustaining
of all of the SSW<->UES harmonics that
exist within the universe -- which comprises
the greatest part of the energy-flow that un-
derpins the expansion of the Universe.

This's also how and why the Continuous
one-way universal flowing of energy, from
order to disorder, that is what's =described=
by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T], =permeates=
physical reality -- more energy is required
to sustain the existences of an SSW<->UES
harmonic than is 'contained-within' it. The
excess energy flows away from the SSW
after performing is 'containment'-'sustain-
ing' work in a dissipative way be-cause it's
Directed in accord with the [positively-convex]
spherical Geometry of the SSW -- which
renders the exiting-continuous-energy-flow
always-dissipative -- which is some of how
and why "work" is work, and how and why
work is =always= performed at a WDB2T-
cost.

What's been referred to as "matter" is 'just'
energy that's 'contained-within' SSW<->UES
harmonics as I explained in my previous
post [linked-to at the top, above.] In TH, what's
been referred to as "matter" is, therefore tech-
nically-termed 'contained'-energy.

When 'contained'-energy moves toward
other 'contained'-energy, what's actually
happening is that it's just going with the
net continuous energy-flow that is WDB2T --
be-cause there's a relatively-greater energy-
dissipation [as above] on a 'line' between
the two instances of 'contained'-energy.

'gravity' literally is WDB2T. It's been 'pre-
sumed' to 'occur as a property of matter'
be-cause what's been referred to as "mat-
ter" exists as a function of the 'containment'-
'sustaining' work that's performed by the
UES upon =every= 'atom' that exists within
physical reality [which is what 'sustains'
the existences of the SSW<->UES harmon-
ics, which is what 'atoms' physically are.]

The rest of how and why "work" is work, and
the =whole= of how and why what've been
referred to as "mass" and "inertia" exist, is
closely-correlated to the above -- be-cause,
whenever 'contained'-energy is accelerated,
the work performed to impart acceleration
to it must re-Direct =all= of the 'contained'-
energy and =all= of the energy that's 'sus-
taining' the energy's 'containment' -- all of
which gracefully-unifies with all of the above
stuff.

All of Special and General Relativities are
completely-contained in the above stuff.

Again, Tapered Harmony goes on and on
like this, =everything= that's ever been exper-
imentally-observed is unified in TH and all
of it reduced to the =one= Continuous energy-
flow.

Folks who've been reading the discussions
I've posted in b.n over the 'years' have probably
come to understand this(?)

Anyway, I'd like to be allowed to discuss TH
in-person with folks who are interested in
either hearing-more of it.

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| || ||| |||| ||||| [...]
||||| |||||| [...]
||||| [...]
||||
||||| There's exactly-Zero 'quantum' =anything= <-edited
||||| within physical reality.
||||| [...]
|||| [...]
||| [...]
|| [...]
| [...]

|| All of this happens via =continuous= en-
|| ergy-exchange between the 'contained'
|| energy and its energy-surround, and
|| all of this happens in =Exact=, Contin-
|| uous accord with the Continuous one-
|| way universal flowing of energy, from
|| order to disorder, that is what's =described=
|| by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T], which physically-
|| real Continuous energy-flow is what un-
|| derpins the observed expansion of the
|| Universe.
| [...]

The 3D-Energydynamics are =continuous=,
but 3D-energy-flow Directionalities vary in
continuous ways with respect to the energy-
'containment' dynamics that I've discussed
in my previous posts.

I 'forgot' to "tie-up" everything in the observed
black-body power-specturm.

As TempK increases, the increased energy-
flow that is what relative-"heat" is drives the
SSW<->UES harmonics of the black-body
vessel's stuff that much more energetically --
be-cause the "heat" is 'just' relatively-increas-
ed energy-flow 'within' the local UES that's
"heated".

This occurs as a "bolstering" of the UES
local to the black-body vessel, which bol-
stering results in the local UES performing
relatively-more work during its 'sustaining'
of the SSW<->UES harmonics of the black-
body vessel.

The max-power peak of the black-body
power spectrum shifts toward the high-
frequency 'end' be-cause, since all of the
SSW<->UES harmonics are 'jacked-up'
by the locally-increased UES-pressure
that's due to the addition of energy that
is what "heat" is.

The power-spectrum falls toward 'zero' at
the high-frequency 'end' be-cause energy
=always= flows in the Direction of great-
est freedom-to-move, which [energy's-
freedom-to-move is referred to in Tapered
Harmony as "ephemerance", which term
was coined from "ephemeral" to connote
the uncontainable comings and goings
of energy within the one universal energy-
flow that is WDB2T], in the black-body pow-
er-spectrum is literally demarcated by the
"peak" of the power-spectrum curve -- be-
cause all of the relatively-high-frequency
SSW<->UES harmonics "dump-energy"
relatively-more-powerfully than do the rel-
atively-lower-frequency SSW<->UES
harmonics -- which is how and why the
power-spectrum is skewed toward its
high-frequency 'end', and how and why
the max-power-"peak" shifts contuously
toward the high-frequency 'end' as TempK
is continuously-increased.

All physical "phase-changes" occur for
the reasons briefly explained above --
which is how and why the black-body
'vessel' always melts and vaporizes as
TempK approaches and exceeds the
"vaporization-temperatures" of the stuff
of which the 'vessel' is comprised.

The same dynamics briefly-explained
above occur at =all= scales within phys-
ical reality -- from infinitely-small to in-
finitely-large, in Cosmology, wholly-De-
termining stars' evolutions.

Tapered Harmony goes on and on like
this.

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| [...]

||||| There's exactly-Zero 'quantum' =anything= <-edited
||||| within physical reality.
| [...]

| All of Special and General Relativities are
| completely-contained in the above stuff.
| [...]

Only, be-cause all calcs in TH are done in
3-dimensions, it's much easier to calc
anything.

[What's been referred to as "time" is an en-
tirely-man-conceptualized 'thing' that has
no physically-real existence.

What has been referred to as "time" is
actually 'just' continuous-energy flow-
ing in rigorous accord with WDB2T.

To see this, consider what happens when
you wind your watch. In so doing, you per-
form work that imparts "potential energy"
to the mainspring in your watch [you 'pile-
up' energy, in a physically-real way, 'within'
the SSW<->UES harmonics comprising
the stuff out of which the spring was man-
ufactured.] You strap your watch on, and
the "potential energy" that your winding-
work 'imparted' to the spring flows contin-
uously out of the spring, which, because
it's fixed in a relatively-precisely-engineered
way within your watch's "clockworks", im-
parts "power" to the clockworks, which,
since it's engineered to relatively-precise-
ly to "govern" continuous-energy's flowing
'out-of the spring and 'into' the clockworks
so that one complete-rotation of the "min-
ute-hand" will occur in approximately 1/3600th
of an Earth-axial-rotation, and the so that one
complete-rotation of the "hour-hand" will
occur in approximately 1/24th of an Earth-
axial-rotation, by looking at the relative-
positions of the "hands" on your watch,
you'll be able to know, commensurate
to the quality of the Engineering of the
watch, where you 'momentarily' are rel-
ative to Earth's rotational-dynamics, and,
hence, with respect to 'day' and 'night',
and all the 'gradations' in-between.]

There's exactly-Zero "time" anywhere in
the mix.

All there is is energy-flowing-continuously
in Directions that are asserted by the Eng-
ineer who designs the "watch".

=Everything= that's 'presumed' 'time' -- same-
old, same-old.

All there =ever= is is continuous-energy-
flowing in rigorous accord with WDB2T.

This's True in Special and General Rela-
tivities, and in =every= other thing that
Physicists do.

There is =never= any "time" in any of it,
be-cause what's been referred to as
"time" has no physically-real existence.

100% of the Directional information is
right-there in any 3D-Energy-gradient,
anyway, so invoking 'time' only flummox-
es calculations.

So Special and General Relativities can
be done in 3D, and all of what they 'norm-
ally' yield, from the traditional Reimannian-
Geometry [4D] calcs falls-right-out, along
with much-more really-useful stuff.

Let me show you, in-person?

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
Whoops-a-dasies!

| [...]

| one complete-rotation of the "minute-hand"
| will occur in approximately [1/1440th] <- edited
| of an Earth-axial-rotation, [...]

Sorry. Was focused-deeply on the actual
Calculation that I was discussing.

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| || ||| [...]
||| |||| [...]
||| [...]
||
||| There's exactly-Zero 'quantum' =anything= <-edited
||| within physical reality.
||| [...]
|| [...]
| [...]

| Releigh-Jeans just got the =whole= black-
| body power-spectrum mixed-up with 'atom-
| ic'-radiation-power -- even though the idea
| that everything 'within' physical reality is
| comprised of 'indivisible atoms' was already
| 'millenia'-old.
|
| Because, when one distinguishes betwen
| the whole black-body-power-specturm and
| the radiating-powers of 'individual-atoms',
| the infinity predicted in Raleigh-Jeans is
| right-there, plain-to-see in the observed
| black-body experimental results -- because,
| if the 'containment' vessel used in a black-
| body experiment did not melt-down and
| vaporize as TempK was increased =without-
| bounds=, as TempK increases =without-
| bounds=, greatest-frequency emitted from
| the black-body would also increase =with-
| out-bounds=.
|
| The 'infinite'-power is 'in' the 'individual-atom'
| consideration, not in the whole-black-body-
| power-spectrum consideration.
|
| But, if TempK could, infact, be increased
| without-bounds, =all= instances of black-
| body experiments point Directly to the fact
| that 'atomic'-radiation-frequency would
| also 'increase without-bounds'.
|
| And, since it's long been verified that the
| power of radiated EM occurs as a function
| of frequency, if TempK could be increased
| without-bounds, frequency would increase
| without-bounds, hence radiated-EM-power
| would increase without-bounds.
|
| So the Raleigh-Jeans prediction was cor-
| rect except that it just didn't integrate the
| already-then-known fact that TempK can
| =never= be increased without bounds, be-
| cause all matter vaporizes at it's Temper
| ature-of-vaporization.
| [...]

Although it does say what's important, I 'wish'
I'd taken the 'time' to better-compose the
above discussion, point-out, for instance,
that it constitutes a infinitely-precise, phys-
ically-real instance of Zeno's "halving" dyn-
amics that can =never= reach "the finish-
line".

This's the same-stuff that underpins the
so-called "constant speed of light", "in-
creasing mass as speed approaches
c", and the "relativity of time" of Special
Relativity -- all of which, as I've explained
in long-former msgs, reduce directly to
WDB2T-Determined ephemerance [en-
ergy's freedom to move.]

'constant c', 'relative-mass', and 'relative-
time' =all= occur in =exact= accord with
the stuff quoted above from my earlier
discussion of the way max-frequency
and the "peak" of the power spectrum
occur in black bodies as TempK is in-
creased.

One can force the power-specturm "peak"
to 'move toward' the high-frequency 'end'
of the power-spectrum just so much be-
fore the black-body 'vessel' melts and vap-
orizes -- which happens be-cause, in el-
evating TempK, one is acting to increase
ephemerance local to the entirety of the
SSW<->UES harmonics comprising the
black-body 'vessel', and as more and more
energy is thus added, relatively-more en-
ergy 'moves' in =any= Direction =other than=
into the 'sustaining' of the SSW<->UES
harmonics -- which is visible in the 'ordin-
ary' visual-spectrum emissions of the
black body, which go through 'glowing' red,
to white, which 'whitness' 'contains' =all=
frequencies', which renders both "ephem-
erance" and energy's going in any Direc-
tion other than into the 'sustaining' of the
SSW<->UES harmonics visible to the naked
eye [no detectors are necessary.]

All of both Special and General Relativity
are contained as subsets in black-body-
radiation set-ups.

So-called "constant c" is =exactly= the same-
stuff as the max-power "peak" never being
able to proceed to 'infinite-frequency' [nev-
er being able to actually make it to the 'end'
of the black-body power-spectrum.

Which is a physically-real, inviolable, instance
of Zeno's ancient stuff.

Tapered Harmony goes on and on like this.

[Anyway, I wrote more pages-long "to-be-dis-
cussed" topic lists again this 'day', but the
above stuff is so IMPORTANT that I'll post
this before considering what I'll post from
this most-current "list" of topics -- because
list is full of other Important stuff [they always
are :-], and I want not to 'overwhelm' folks
with so much 'new-ness' that nothing will
"stick".

It's =really Important= to "get" the stuff I've
briefly discussed above -- be-cause =all=
physically-real Action-Limits are Reified
in-it. This stuff is particularly-Important for
=any= folks who'd 'pretend' to 'know' what
so-called "nuclear weapons" are, and what
=use= of 'nuclear' weapons actually Constitutes.

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
| || ||| |||| [...]
|||| ||||| [...]
|||| [...]
|||
|||| There's exactly-Zero 'quantum' =anything= <-edited
|||| within physical reality.
|||| [...]
||| [...]
|| [...]
| [...]

| 'constant c', 'relative-mass', and 'relative-
| time' =all= occur in =exact= accord with
| the stuff quoted above from my earlier
| discussion of the way max-frequency
| and the "peak" of the power spectrum
| occur in black bodies as TempK is in-
| creased.
| [...]

Understand?

"c" is 'constant' be-cause, as matter is
accelerated toward c, relatively more
of the accelerating energy 'moves' in
any direction =other than= in the dir-
ection of the acceleration.

This's a fundamental 'property' of phys-
ical reality that reduces directly to the
physically-real one-way flow of energy,
from order to disorder, that is what's
=described= by 2nd Thermo [WDB2T.]

Verification of =all= of this of this has
long existed in data that's been going
unused in accelerator set-ups.

If it was metered, the "power" that's
necessary to 'contain' the accelerated
energy yields a direct measure of
ephemerance as c is approached.

Understand?

The power supplied to the 'contain-
ment' magnets has to be metered
with respect to acceleration.

Accelerator set-ups are 'just' macro-
scopic, 'strangely-deformed' 's'SW<->
UES harmonics as I discussed them
earlier in this thread.

The most-important data have been
going-to-waste all along in such set-
ups.

k. p. collins
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
Whoops-a-dasies! :-]

| [...]

CORRECTION:

| so that one complete-rotation of the "min-
| ute-hand" will occur in approximately [1/12th] <-edited
| of an Earth-axial-rotation, and the so that one
| complete-rotation of the "hour-hand" will
| occur in approximately [1/2] an Earth- <-edited
| axial-rotation, by looking at the relative-
| positions of the "hands" on your watch,
| you'll be able to know, commensurate
| to the quality of the Engineering of the
| watch, where you 'momentarily' are rel-
| ative to Earth's rotational-dynamics, and,
| hence, with respect to 'day' and 'night',
| and all the 'gradations' in-between.]
| [...]

[=I= knew what I was writing about :-]

Sorry.

k. p. collins
 
J

Josip Almasi

Jan 1, 1970
0
r said:
I agree that you have no clue of neuroscience. You ask questions and
then seemingly give the answers you want to hear.

....expecting to get responses I seemingly don't won't to hear, yes.
IOW I contribute my answers, right or wrong, for others to learn or
critique.
The two actual science references you cite are good work, but are now
35 to 45 years old. We have learned some things since.
Like?

The two IEEE papers require registration, but the third paper on
quantum neural network models is typical of the work of electrical
engineers or physicists who develop models not terribly dependent on
actual neuroscience mechanisms. If you would like information about
actual physiology, then please ask and I will respond.

Please do.

Regards...
 
R

r norman

Jan 1, 1970
0
...expecting to get responses I seemingly don't won't to hear, yes.
IOW I contribute my answers, right or wrong, for others to learn or
critique.


Please do.

Regards...

You want me to summarize everything that is known about neuroscience
in the last 35 to 40 years and then have me tell you everything about
physiology?

Here is my answer.

Buy a book and read it.
 
R

Radium

Jan 1, 1970
0
One of the goals of making a silicon-based electronic brain is to give
congenitally-blind individuals the ability to see and to give
congenitally-deaf individuals the ability to hear.

A congenitally-deaf individual's brain does not have auditory regions
because of neuroplasticity using the supposed "hearing areas" for
other purposes. So an electronic substitute could -- at least in
theory -- feed the brain with electric signals it would receive if it
did have hearing areas used for auditory perceptions [e.g. the
cochlear nucleus, inferior olivary nucleus, etc, etc.]
 
B

Benjamin

Jan 1, 1970
0
CORRECTION below.

| || [...]
|| ||| [...]
|| [...]
|
|| There's exactly-Zero 'quantum' =anything= <-edited
|| within physical reality.
|| [...]
| [...]

| The 'difference' between the Rayleigh-Jeans
| prediction with respect to radiated-power-at-
| frequency and what was routinely observed
| in black-body experimental set-ups is what
| has been referred to as the "ultraviolet cat-
| astrophe", which provoked late-19th-'century'
| Physics to enter a problem-solving 'frenzy',
| out of which came Max Planck's famous
| 'resolution' of the 'ultraviolet catastrophe'.
|
| Planck converged upon his result via em-
| pirical methods that, at first, even he was
| skeptical of. But as word of his result, and
| the fact that it did yeild numerical values
| that were relatively-close to the experiment-
| ally-observed power-at-frequency-at-TempK
| values of black bodies, folks began to in-
| terpret the 'constant' that Planck had in-
| cluded in his empirical calculation as 'say-
| ing something' "about physical reality".
|
| And that's where almost-all of Physics [with
| the notable exception of Albert Einstein]
| 'flew-off-the-handle', and, while there are
| many analogous Errors that've long-endur-
| ed during the History of Science, I know of
| nothing that is as Sorrow-Filled as has
| been the 'feeding-frenzy' which ensued
| Planck's Erroneous-'guess'.
| [...]

I'm 'taking a break' from my routine partic-
ipation here in b.n -- to "breath-in" for a
change :-]

Purchased some Books, both recently,
and long-ago, and've been reading them.

One of them is =Einstein=, by W. Isaac-
son, which I'm finding to be Interesting
and a well-done view on Dr. Einstein's
Life and Work.

But I've just gotten to the part that discuss-
es Einstein's "Special Relativity" paper,
and I've realized that I did Max Planck an
Injustice in what I wrote above.

Planck was =Correct= in viewing 'quanta'
as a consequence of emission and ab-
sorbtion and =not= as a "property" of
EM radiation.

Sorry, Dr. Planck. You were =Correct=,
along with Max Laue [of those in the
Book as far as I've read.]

I'll discuss more, after I read further in
the Book -- because I've not yet gotten,
in this Book, to any 'point' in which Ein-
stein's view of 'quanta' is explicitly-stated.

But I want to briefly discuss [once again]
Einstein's conceptualization of his "Equiv-
alency Principle", a pillar of General Rel-
ativity. [I worked all of this stuff out 'dec-
ades' ago, but I'm going to use the pace
of Mr. Issacson's Book to "meter-out"
what will be my discussion -- be-cause
the Book provides an excellent 'time'-line
with respect to which to do so, and, well,
it's the Book I'm reading :-]

The Equivalency Principle holds that
there's no way to distinguish between
"gravitational mass" and "inertial mass",
but this's not True, and it =matters=.

"Inertial mass" is correlated to accel-
erations.

All accelerations require energy-'ex-
penditure'.

So all one has to do to See the 'dif-
ference' between "inertial mass" and
"gravitational mass" is to 'view the
energy gauge', which maps "inertial
mass" into WDB2T, Rigorously.

Which allows one to recurse back in-
to the original "equivalency", Seeing
that what's been referred to as "grav-
ity" =must=, itself, be an energy-'con-
suming' dynamic that also has to map-
into WDB2T, be-cause, since "gravita-
tional mass" and "inertial mass"
are indistinguishable with respect to
=motion=, and, since, as above, it's
easy to See that "inertial mass" =re-
quires= energy-'expenditure', if 'grav-
itational mass' 'did not' require energy-
expenditure, =then= it would be 'differ-
ent' from "inertial mass", and that'd
'mean' that the =motion= 'due to'
'gravity' would be 'free', relative to
motion due to energy-'expenditure'-
driven accelerations -- which dis-
closes that there's something, in-
the-mix, that's not properly Reified.

Understand?

Same motion.

In the "inertial" case, requiring en-
ergy-'expenditure'.

In the "gravitational" case, "not re-
quiring" energy-'expenditure'.

But it's the =same= motion.

So it cannot be that the same thing
'requires' energy-'expenditure' just
'because' of the reference-frame in
which it occurs [Galilean Relativity
demonstrates that the "laws of phys-
ics" are the same regardless of
frame of reference.]

I'd Proven it in other ways, and I've
discussed the fundamentals of it's
resolution in prior posts in this thread,
and in other long-ago posts here in
b.n and elsewhere, but, what's been
referred to a "gravity" is an energy-
'consuming' dynamic.

It's the =only= way to preserve "Equiv-
alency" and Galilean Relativity, which
have been right-there, plain-to-See,
all along.

Q. E. D. [again.]

Anyway, the Book is Worth-the-reading,
it's "number one" on =The New York
Times= Best Seller List] so if folks want
to read along, I'll take any and all ques-
tions with respect to anything that's in-it
[eventually, with respect to the whole
Book, but, if folks read ahead of me,
post your Qs, but I'll reply when I've
caught-up to where, in this Book, your
Q arises.]

What I'll be doing is "transforming"
Einstein's Work into Tapered Harmony's
view of physical reality, toward which
end, I'm really looking-forward-to the
'quantum' stuff and reading about
Einstein's Heroic Resistance to it.

It gives me Joy to've Corrected my own
Error with respect to Max Planck's
early view of 'quanta' [as above], and
I'm looking-forward to reading Mr.
Isaacson's account of how Dr. Planck's
view played-out as the 'quantum band-
wagon' began to 'roll'.

k. p. collins
 
Top