Maker Pro
Maker Pro

A hacker at work? IP 80.46.128.141

Ephram said:
[email protected] says...

Predictable, boring and repetitive response by a paranoid obsessive.

Wow! You've really gone and done it now. Don't you realise I'm in
Bean's kill-file? He only sees my postings when someone re-posts them?
Don't you realise you've forced him into a position where he's got to
reply? Unless you're in his kill-file too, along with all the
others.....
 
C

class_a_zpk_12wpm_unlike_2800

Jan 1, 1970
0
Grow up, dipshit. This is Usenet, a public, free speech forum.

i suggest that you change that to free opinion expressing forum.

then again as your header indicates your are 8 hours behind, it
indicates that the 8hours may actually be the LSB of just how
far you may REALLY be.
 
M

Martin

Jan 1, 1970
0
DarkMatter said:
Hey, dingledorf, port scanning is NOT causing the computer to
"perform" any function other than a return as to whether the port is
open or not. That occurs at the network level, and no access is made
to any computer data or programs.

BONE up on tcp/ip. Port scanning is required. Your ISP does it all
the time. So do others. Guess what... It's legal.

The law, as phrased, does not require that you actually access data or
programs - just that you take steps in preparation to do so -it is very
specific in that. Doing almost anything which could help in accessing the
data or programs could be considered illegal unless you have some other good
explaination why you are doing it - ISPs and internet administrators can
easily find an explaination but the rest of us could have some difficulty
explaining why we have, in quick succession, scanned all sorts of obscure
ports :)

Martin (G8FXC)
 
M

Mike Mann

Jan 1, 1970
0
BONE up on tcp/ip. Port scanning is required. Your ISP does it all
the time. So do others. Guess what... It's legal.

There's no case law yet, but there's at least a possibility that port
scanning may be illegal under the CMA (in England).

But it intrigues me that you think that (all?) ISPs do port scanning
because I'm not aware of any that do this. Some may try a TCP connect
to, say port 80, if running a Web server is contrary to the T&Cs of
the particular ISP and some may do proactive checking for open mail
relays and proxies of various types but this sort of activity isn't
really "port scanning" of the sort that nmap (for example) can do.

I can't think of any reason why an ISP should want to scan a range of
ports on a customer's machine. Can you enlighten me?

Mike.
 
R

Ross Mac

Jan 1, 1970
0
"class_a_zpk_12wpm_unlike_2800"
i suggest that you change that to free opinion expressing forum.

then again as your header indicates your are 8 hours behind, it
indicates that the 8hours may actually be the LSB of just how
far you may REALLY be.

Sounds like you have his number...we don't call him Don'tMatter for nothing!
 
A

Anthony Fremont

Jan 1, 1970
0
Keith said:
Not all ISPs bother with NNTP anymore.
True.

Most haven't a clue what it is, so it's not a priority.

Now that's just plain wrong.
I pay for NewsGuy because my ISP really doesn't care
to keep their news servers current. Newsguy also allows me to
access the same servers with the same identity no matter what
network I'm attached to.

You can do the same thing with Google, but it's free. So why pay?
My company *is* directly net attached. Guess again.

DM, large companies (like IBM) don't mind wasting the limited resources
of routable addresses, even though it's completely unnecessary. I
suppose it makes them feel important. ;-)
 
R

Ross Mac

Jan 1, 1970
0
Keith R. Williams said:
I notice that I've now been assaulted by a DimBulb FourFer.
Dimbulb, if you want to lecture others on netiquite, you should
follow some yourself. It's simply rude to answer a single post
multiple times. This requires multiple answers which causes an
exponential growth in articles. Perhaps that's your plan, to
limit discussion. Oh, well...

My work *fixed* addresses are in the *reserved* IPv4 range. You
wouldn't know anything about this though.
Dimbulb criticized me for posting twice under the same post.....well, I did
it because I left something out...then he said the ID's were the
same...wrong again...then he headed to this thread and posted 4 times under
the same post.....Now he thinks you are in Australia....close as I can tell,
you are from California (just a guess from you news provider)....Looks like
Don'tMatter missed by a couple of continents....I still say he's swallowing
the bong water again!!.....As the British say...."what a wanker" this guy
is!
 
R

Ross Mac

Jan 1, 1970
0
Keith R. Williams said:
news.ops.worldnet.att.net>, [email protected]
says...

Saw that, but figured you were handling things just fine. ;-)


Opposite corner (sorta) of the 48 from my news server (NewsGuy is
a payfer news company, primarily). Isn't the Internet wunnerful?


He's been hooked on bong water for some time!
At least I hit the right continent!....Have a Great Holiday... Ross
 
D

DarkMatter

Jan 1, 1970
0
I notice that I've now been assaulted by a DimBulb FourFer.
Dimbulb, if you want to lecture others on netiquite, you should
follow some yourself. It's simply rude to answer a single post
multiple times. This requires multiple answers which causes an
exponential growth in articles. Perhaps that's your plan, to
limit discussion. Oh, well...

My work *fixed* addresses are in the *reserved* IPv4 range. You
wouldn't know anything about this though.

Better watch out, or I'll post a copy of your key ID.
 
D

DarkMatter

Jan 1, 1970
0
You are stupid (big stretch here folks). Not all ISPs bother
with NNTP anymore.

Sorry, dipshit, but if an ISP offers "full internet access" it is
assumed that they are including usenet access, or they subscribe to a
server and proxy it. If not, it ain't "full internet access".

Get a clue. NNTP is a part of any proper internet access package.
 
D

DarkMatter

Jan 1, 1970
0
...or perhaps they don't want to spend the money to change
300,000+ systems that work? There is a lot of inertia there.

Or blatant, overfuckingpaid doughnut and coffee mentality
procrastination.
 
R

Ross Mac

Jan 1, 1970
0
DarkMatter said:
You're both fucking retards.

Hey Tard boy...you really ought to consider expanding your
vocabulary....Being a monosyllabic Troll is not very becoming!!
 
R

Ross Mac

Jan 1, 1970
0
DarkMatter said:
Better watch out, or I'll post a copy of your key ID.

Ooooooo I'll bet the whole net is worried now!!
Our rubber helmeted tard in bicycle knickers with keyboard bruises on his
knuckles is on a rampage!!!
Fire up your bong again DopeMatter and enjoy some of that medical marijuana
you grow!!
 
B

bushbadee

Jan 1, 1970
0
Ross Mac said:
Hey Tard boy...you really ought to consider expanding your
vocabulary....Being a monosyllabic Troll is not very becoming!!
Hmm, I see from above this is going to GB.
Is he know there also.?
He can not use more than one syllable.
He would need two brain cells for that and he is 1.5 brain cells short for
that.
 
R

Ross Mac

Jan 1, 1970
0
bushbadee said:
Hmm, I see from above this is going to GB.
Is he know there also.?
He can not use more than one syllable.
He would need two brain cells for that and he is 1.5 brain cells short for
that.
Yes, it is sad but true. DopeMatter has invaded the UK..
And they thought they had their hands full with Airy!
Wait till they get a dose of the rubber helmeted, bong yielding TardBoy from
Southern California!
 
D

DarkMatter

Jan 1, 1970
0
Ooooooo I'll bet the whole net is worried now!!

No, but he might be. Unless, like you, he is too stupid.
Our rubber helmeted tard in bicycle knickers with keyboard bruises on his
knuckles is on a rampage!!!

You should really stop projecting your own stupidity onto others,
idiot boy.
Fire up your bong again DopeMatter and enjoy some of that medical marijuana
you grow!!
You seem to have a problem with this. I mean... I know old retards
like you have no clues anchored in reality... so.. tell us, ya old
fart... what is wrong with cannabis for medicinal purpose?

You're aa goddamned idiot. That much is certain.
 
R

Ross Mac

Jan 1, 1970
0
DarkMatter said:
No, but he might be. Unless, like you, he is too stupid.


You should really stop projecting your own stupidity onto others,
idiot boy.

You seem to have a problem with this. I mean... I know old retards
like you have no clues anchored in reality... so.. tell us, ya old
fart... what is wrong with cannabis for medicinal purpose?

You're aa goddamned idiot. That much is certain.

There are a multitude of drugs that do the same thing and are cheap....This
medical marijuana this is pure bull that dopers like yourself use to try for
legalization.....Personally I could care less....But your posts show that
something serious is going on upstairs and I think we can verture to guess
that the drugs have taken a hold!
You say I am old??? Well, DopeMatter, how old am I.....Retired does not
equal old, sometimes it means rich or successful!
Talk about reading things into a post....look in the mirror and what do you
see...a pitiful 43 year old, rubber helmeted Tard in bicycle pants with
missing teeth....I know the teeth are missing because anyone with a mouth
like yours has most likely been tossed off a few bar stools. Or perhaps in
your case, fell off a few bar stools. Get a clue and buy a dictionary doper
boy!
 
R

Ross Mac

Jan 1, 1970
0
jim.gm4dhj said:
Now now children...behave !......
Now if that happened what would you have to do this afternoon....hehehehe
 
Top