Maker Pro
Maker Pro

A DoD design contract?

  • Thread starter martin griffith
  • Start date
M

martin griffith

Jan 1, 1970
0
M

martin griffith

Jan 1, 1970
0
Mine went right to it.

I think Telefonica is blocked by some sites, loads of spam generators
used to use telefonica, but I got through using Tor, via germany,
eventually


martin
 
P

Paul Hovnanian P.E.

Jan 1, 1970
0
Paul Hovnanian P.E. said:
No problem at all. They don't state in the requirements if the subject
carrying the PSU is expected to survive acute radiation poisoning
following the 96 hour period.

Never mind. I found the bit about 'no radio-isotopes'. Damn
spoil-sports.

The system energy density they want suggests either some really exotic
battery chemistries or a fuel cell plus a small recargable cell to
provide short term peaking power. They are looking at about 1.8E6
Joules/Kg for the system. Lithium-ion batteries (alone) run around 4E5
Joules/Kg if I'm not mistaken. I didn't see anything about noise. Just
rig up a little generator using a model airplane engine and some
rechargable batteries to ride through peak loads, submerged operation,
etc. The spec's didn't say the wearer had to be sane after the end of
the test either. ;-)
 
P

Phil Allison

Jan 1, 1970
0
"John B"
Anyone who can squeeze 185kWHr capacity into 4kg deserves to win $1M.



** The DOD spec is for 20 watts for 96 hours = 1.92 kWH.




........ Phil
 
W

Winfield

Jan 1, 1970
0
Phil said:
John B wote,


** The DOD spec is for 20 watts for 96 hours = 1.92 kWH.

Then they should win 1.92/185 * $1M = $10.4k bucks.
 
J

John B

Jan 1, 1970
0
"John B"




** The DOD spec is for 20 watts for 96 hours = 1.92 kWH.




....... Phil

Ah, Mea Culpa. I failed to look at the DoD spec and interpreted the
magazine article as 1920W/hr for 96 hours. A little bit different from
reality.
 
R

Rich Grise

Jan 1, 1970
0
Never mind. I found the bit about 'no radio-isotopes'. Damn
spoil-sports.

The system energy density they want suggests either some really exotic
battery chemistries or a fuel cell plus a small recargable cell to
provide short term peaking power. They are looking at about 1.8E6
Joules/Kg for the system. Lithium-ion batteries (alone) run around 4E5
Joules/Kg if I'm not mistaken. I didn't see anything about noise. Just
rig up a little generator using a model airplane engine and some
rechargable batteries to ride through peak loads, submerged operation,
etc. The spec's didn't say the wearer had to be sane after the end of
the test either. ;-)

And not only that, but with an engine, the load would get lighter as
fuel is burned. :) ISTR seeing a little Honda 1KW about the size of a
football, once.

Cheers!
Rich
 
P

Paul Hovnanian P.E.

Jan 1, 1970
0
Rich said:
And not only that, but with an engine, the load would get lighter as
fuel is burned. :) ISTR seeing a little Honda 1KW about the size of a
football, once.

Seriously, I gave the requirements a quick scan and didn't see anything
definite about the wearer's comfort. I don't seriously think anyone will
be proposing a reciprocating engine. But some fuel cell technologies can
get pretty warm in operation. The temperatures may not reach harmful
levels, but I don't want to lug a heating pad around the Iranian* desert
for 96 hours. In fact, one parameter of interest to the DoD seems to be
how thick the unit is, suggesting that this will be warn against a
soldier's body.

*Of course I'm kidding about this possibility. Bush will have us in Iran
long before this power pack is put into production.
 
Top