| In article <2pJsc.551$_%
[email protected]>,
|
| > I'd be inclined to say 'stuff it' and immediately go for a single
| > switch 'isolated' forward converter. I've just had a play with
| > designing a sepic converter and I wouldn't put it up my bum.
|
| DNA. I know you have LTSpice/SwitcherCAD and that
| does offer a sepic converter (based on the LT1270A)
| in response to Jim's spec. I'd be quite interested
| in your informed comments/criticisms about LT's
| offered circuit.
|
| --
| Tony Williams.
That's a hard question, not sure I can do it justice.
The software, naturally, adjusts the feedback resistor ratio to give the
output voltage required. It also adjusts the inductance so there is more
decicion making going on. I don't now what criterea it may use but a
guess might be something like 20% ripple current in the inductors.
One thing that doesn't seem to change is the compensation components
which appear to be fixed at 1K and 1U which, sort of, implies a slow
loop. I'd have to analyse it further to comment and that sort of thing
bends my head until I come up with a method.
I have downloaded AN-19 for a cursory poke around.
The system is going to be second order up to the zero, 1K/1U, frequency
and there is also a right half plane zero knocking about in there.
Overall it doesn't look like the software optimises the loop. LT's
method is a bit 'suck it and see' so I think you are still left with
that task yourself.
The standard circuit it comes up with is a bit...... 'Fixed' and it's
useful to break it out of the given design mode and copy then paste the
circuit into an ordinary diagram window. Then you get to have a proper
play. I'll mention that the inductor coupling coefficient of 1 is
unrealistic and may be undesireable if you want to achieve ripple
current steering.
The circuit has start up and stability problems and is improved by
adding a 100nF capacitor across the feedback resistor. This renders the
circuit first order overall and the start up and transient seem better.
That's waving a bit of a wet finger in the air. Like I say I haven't
tried to analyse things properly.
Overall I'd say the circuit provided is a starting point but requires
further optimisation to get the final result. I wouldn't expect software
to be able to do that too well anyway. You are still forced to get your
head into what the circuit is doing and make appropriate decisions
yourself.
As I've said LT's application notes aren't to heavy on analysis and
compensation so... they could do with a bit more work in that area. That
sort of stuff is difficult and it's no better and maybe slightly worse
than what I've seen from other sources.
It's not a panacea but 11/10 for having a good bit of software to try
things out. I wouldn't be without it.
DNA