Maker Pro
Maker Pro

10 Megawatt Photovoltaic System

M

Merlin-7 KI4ILB

Jan 1, 1970
0
It still looks nice!!!
Now I know why I am having such a hard time adding panels, not to mention
the big foot print on the side of the box DHL droped off with all those nice
stickers on them saying (DO NOT LAY FLAT GLASS)
Yep it was shattered....sigh
 
S

Solar Guppy

Jan 1, 1970
0
Only ship panels Via Truck and band to a pallet for shipping solar panels,
otherwise you take ALL the risk in damage

All the Major shippers (FedEx,UPS,DHL) have specific disclaimers for ANY
product that contains glass

I learned the hard way on this as FedEx destroyed 3 panels (different
shipments , within 2 weeks) and even though I paid for full insurance its
was not covered due to the Glass clause , buried in a 120 page terms
documents.

Lessoned learn :(
 
R

Roland Mösl

Jan 1, 1970
0
http://solarbuzz.com/News/NewsEUPR241.htm

I do not like this. It's a waste of natural ground.

As long as not every roof, every fassade towards south
is completly filled with photovoltaic, we should
not waste other areas for this.

We should live where we harvest energy
We should harvest energy where we live

This is a strike against this
 
H

H. Dziardziel

Jan 1, 1970
0
I do not like this. It's a waste of natural ground.

As long as not every roof, every fassade towards south
is completly filled with photovoltaic, we should
not waste other areas for this.

We should live where we harvest energy
We should harvest energy where we live

This is a strike against this


Cheaper and more practical than retrofitting high rise buildings
with panels?.
 
H

H. Dziardziel

Jan 1, 1970
0
Europe is a dense inhabited country

There is no natural surface to waste.

Yes but properly facing space was found for that. Where else, at
a beach? <grin> Highways? And what about in dense inner
cities? That's what I meant about, " retrofitting high rise
buildings with panels?" There's also economy of scale for that..
There was an economic reason for that installation.
There is nothing more ugly, than a building
without photovoltaic roof and a field of
photovoltaic behind.

Agreed but cost determines the viable outcome.
..
 
R

Roland Mösl

Jan 1, 1970
0
H. Dziardziel said:
Yes but properly facing space was found for that. Where else, at
a beach? <grin> Highways?

There is just right now a project for noise protection
for a highway near a small city.

All the noise protection covering the high way
should be photovoltaic heat combined modules.

The heat will be used for green houses, delivering
extrem cheap heat to grow plants
Agreed but cost determines the viable outcome.

Cost ist determined by taxes.
A major part of future tax systms will be a
land usage tax.

This makes it cheaper to put photovoltaic on houses.
 
Top