Jasen Betts said:
when dealing with some circuits it may be convenient to call that
point a ground especially if the midpoint of the divider is only
lightly loaded.
"virtual ground" has a special meaning - it may be better to refer to
the divider midpoint as a synthetic ground.
The thing is, GND, if strictly interpreted, is a statement that the point is
at zero potential with respect to the actual ground.
But, we all know that in many cases GND is non other than a circuit
reference point from which voltages are measured and stated, and that
actually GND may not quite be at 0V with respect to true ground.
As to a virtual ground, well, that again does not necessarly mean the point
is really at 0V with respect to ground.
Usually virtual ground is generally at the same potential as the 0V point in
a circuit, often labelled GND, but it does not have to be. For instance,
with the inverting amplifier what matters is that V- is at the same
potential as the common connection between source and output. The cicuit
goes from source, thru Rin, through Rf, through the output cicuit, and the
output connects to the other side of the source. I guess there is no reason
the common connection needs strictly be at 0V. See diagram.
But I think in the vast majority of circuits V- will almost invariably be at
0V, GND.
+--------------------------+-- +12V
| |
| +ve |
[Vin] 10V |
| -ve Rin 5R
| |
| | V-
+---+2V +--------- +2V
| ^ |
^Common Connection | "Virtual GND"
| |
| +ve 20V Rf 10R
[Vout] |
| -ve |
| |
+--------------------------+-- -18V Vout
Whatever the actual voltage is at V-, one thing is for sure, virtual ground
in the context of Op Amps is practically a stable value, and almost
invariably at 0V.
Not entirely sure what the midpoint of a voltage divider is, when both
resistors are the same value. A lot depends on whether for some reason
someone wants to declare it as 0V or GND. Not sure if the center point has
some aspect of "virtual" to it or not. Possibly I suppose.
Above, just my take on things.