Microwave Magnetron Projects

Discussion in 'Electronic Design' started by Paul Hovnanian P.E., Oct 5, 2007.

  1. I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?

    I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.

    Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.

    --
    Paul Hovnanian
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    The blinking cursor writes; and having writ, blinks on.
    Paul Hovnanian P.E., Oct 5, 2007
    #1
  2. Paul Hovnanian P.E.

    John Larkin Guest

    On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:46:45 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
    <> wrote:

    >I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    >magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    >cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    >there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?
    >
    >I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    >obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    >destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.
    >
    >Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.


    Ionize some gas maybe?

    John
    John Larkin, Oct 5, 2007
    #2
  3. "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <> hath wroth:

    >I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    >magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    >cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    >there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?


    No. At that power level, literally anything you do external to the
    oven box will belch dangerous levels of radiation.

    The closest approximation of a safe application is a 2.4GHz ATV
    xmitter:
    <http://www.vhfdx.net/docs/mwpll.pdf>
    <http://lea.hamradio.si/~s57uuu/mischam/magnetr/index.htm>
    Note that the typical microwave power supply will not work for CW or
    TV applications without considerable modifications. 100 watts CW at
    2.4GHz is still a rather dangerous power level.

    >I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    >obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    >destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.
    >
    >Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.


    Remember, you have but one life to give to your profession.

    --
    Jeff Liebermann
    150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    Jeff Liebermann, Oct 5, 2007
    #3
  4. Paul Hovnanian P.E.

    Barry Lennox Guest

    On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:46:45 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
    <> wrote:

    >I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    >magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    >cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    >there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?
    >
    >I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    >obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    >destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.
    >
    >Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.


    See "RF Design" back sometime in 1989, I know I have a copy
    somewhere. They modded one into an ATV Tx.

    I'd be interested in something new and novel. I've gutted many over
    the years, and usually strip them for the useful parts (microswitches,
    control PCBs, HV diodes and caps, thermal switches, etc.) And the
    magnets are very useful around the workshop. I've even made a
    "magnetic broom" with 6 of them mounted on an old broom handle, great
    for picking up errant nails, etc.

    Barry
    Barry Lennox, Oct 5, 2007
    #4
  5. Paul Hovnanian P.E.

    Tim Williams Guest

    It would be nice to direct it into a large cylindrical cavity into which a
    plastic bucket slides tightly. The bucket contains a solution you want to
    heat, which for some reason must be done in this container (e.g., solution
    reacts with metal or glass containers, or you don't have such, etc.).

    The cavity would thus be open ended, but the water should be an effective
    screen, as long as it's deep enough in the bucket.

    Safety would of course be an issue, but interlock switches could be
    provided for sensing that the bucket is firmly seated and perhaps a
    dielectric sensor used to ensure the water level is always high enough.

    And of course, the magnetron contains four potentially valuable things:
    magnets, aluminum heatsink fins (a few cents), a solid copper body (maybe a
    buck at today's copper prices) and a thermionic heater-cathode.

    The middle two are nice to me, since I melt metals, and the last would be
    nice to someone with a bell jar.

    Tim

    --
    Deep Fryer: A very philosophical monk.
    Website @ http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms

    "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    > magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    > cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    > there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?
    >
    > I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    > obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    > destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.
    >
    > Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.
    >
    > --
    > Paul Hovnanian
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > The blinking cursor writes; and having writ, blinks on.
    Tim Williams, Oct 5, 2007
    #5
  6. On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:46:45 -0700, in sci.electronics.design "Paul
    Hovnanian P.E." <> wrote:

    >I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    >magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    >cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    >there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?
    >
    >I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    >obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    >destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.
    >
    >Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.


    You might need some test equipment, say
    http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/fashion/wi fi-detector-shirt-self detects-geeks-307516.php


    Martin
    Martin Griffith, Oct 5, 2007
    #6
  7. On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:46:45 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
    <> wrote:

    >I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    >magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    >cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    >there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?
    >
    >I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    >obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    >destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.
    >
    >Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.


    http://amasci.com/weird/microwave/voltage1.html

    I'll toss out one extra personal experience, too. In the last year of
    high school, we had a science teacher with a masters in physics from
    Northwestern University and a grand total of 7 students in the
    advanced class. We used a klystron, not a magnetron, and the
    wavelength you are talking about is about 5 inches I think, which is
    somewhat shorter than what we were working with then. But we "beamed"
    the klystron into the classroom from a desk on one side at a "crystal"
    we'd built with tin-foil-wrapped Styrofoam balls stuck together with
    sticks. These allowed us to use watt-meters, held by hand, to measure
    different points on the other side of the "crystal", graph them, and
    derive the diffraction patterns from the resulting measurements.

    I remember some tinkering to get it running well and at the time I
    didn't have any idea what a waveguide was, but it gave a great
    hands-on, macro-scale understanding to how x-ray crystallography
    works.

    I'm not so sure I'd do anything like this with a 2.4GHz magnetron and
    some adapted waveguide, blasting an open room in which I was wandering
    around taking measurements. Also, your own body in this case may be a
    problem, since you are mostly water and you could interfere way too
    much with what you were trying to measure. So I don't think this
    lesson would be safe or as useful an educational tool, unless you
    found another way to take those measurements.

    This comes from someone (me) who made "rocket candy fuel" from melting
    potassium nitrate and sugar in a florence flask/beaker double-boiler
    using boiling sulfuric acid as the bath to keep hot spots from forming
    (melt temp was about 300C, flash point about 400C), and where I'm
    nestled behind piles of sand bags I'd set up in the garage, just in
    case. And that was only one of many different mixtures I experimented
    with, including making mercury fulminate and nitroglycerin. So you
    might consider a little, before you beam yourself or some hapless
    volunteer with a dispersed 1kW beam of 2.4GHz at a distance of a few
    dozen feet away.

    No way would I do today what I was doing back then. (Or maybe I
    really would, given half an excuse, and just won't say so in public.
    ;)

    Best of luck,
    Jon
    Jonathan Kirwan, Oct 6, 2007
    #7
  8. I'm not planning on running this thing outside of an adequate
    waveguide/enclosure. So nobody has to worry about my survivors going
    after the individual who provided me with the plans for a microwave
    hairdryer. ;-)

    One other thing: Its my understanding that the power supply for these
    things is basically a constant current supply. The current is what
    determines the magnetron's output power. If I decide its worthwhile to
    modify the supply, I'm wondering how far the output of one of these can
    be throttled down. I suppose the datasheet might provide this info. once
    I get the oven disassembled.

    --
    Paul Hovnanian mailto:p
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Speed is n0 subsittute fo accurancy.
    Paul Hovnanian P.E., Oct 6, 2007
    #8
  9. Paul Hovnanian P.E.

    James Arthur Guest

    On Oct 5, 12:03 pm, Barry Lennox <> wrote:
    > On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:46:45 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
    >
    > <> wrote:
    > >I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    > >magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    > >cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    > >there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?

    >
    > >I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    > >obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    > >destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.

    >
    > >Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.

    >
    > See "RF Design" back sometime in 1989, I know I have a copy
    > somewhere. They modded one into an ATV Tx.


    http://mysite.verizon.net/resri52l/

    Cheers,
    James Arthur
    James Arthur, Oct 6, 2007
    #9
  10. Paul Hovnanian P.E.

    Spajky Guest

    On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:46:45 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
    <> wrote:

    >I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    >magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    >cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    >there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?


    maybe using a magnetron (since the cavity is resonant to wifi band)
    and its small antenna inside complete to use it like a "driver" for
    some "can wifi antenna" connected to some WLAN stuff ?

    I was thinking about that, but could not find at that time at junk
    yard some broken microwave oven ...
    --
    Regards , SPAJKY ®
    mail addr. @ my site @ http://www.spajky.vze.com
    5y - "Tualatin OC-ed / BX-Slot1 / inaudible setup!"
    Spajky, Oct 6, 2007
    #10
  11. Paul Hovnanian P.E.

    JosephKK Guest

    Paul Hovnanian P.E. posted to sci.electronics.design:

    > I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    > magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before
    > I cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl
    > magnets), are there any (safe and legal) uses for the working
    > magnetron?
    >
    > I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    > obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this
    > before destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.
    >
    > Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.
    >


    How about using it as the core of a humidifier?
    JosephKK, Oct 6, 2007
    #11
  12. Paul Hovnanian P.E.

    Martin Brown Guest

    On Oct 5, 6:58 pm, John Larkin
    <> wrote:
    > On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:46:45 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
    >
    > <> wrote:
    > >I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    > >magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    > >cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    > >there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?

    >
    > >I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    > >obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    > >destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.

    >
    > >Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.

    >
    > Ionize some gas maybe?


    It works pretty well to ionise Helium for a microwave induced plasma
    as an ion source for ICP-MS, that is provided that you don't mind the
    risk of catarracts, blindness and frying your kidneys. I once walked
    into a lab where a senior researcher (who should know better) was
    adjusting one with all interlocks off and the plasma fully exposed.
    Surprisingly pleasing pale reddish coloured flame but I was out of
    there instantly. About 1kW output and a spark to start the thing at
    atmospheric pressure. eg.

    http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/sas/sas/2001/00000055/00000002/art00003

    By comparison the RF ICPMS argon plasma flames are unpleasantly bright
    and UV rich but nothing like as dangerous.

    Anyone without the requisite knowledge to keep the microwaves safely
    confined can expect to get some very nasty complications from
    microwave exposure.

    Regards,
    Martin Brown
    Martin Brown, Oct 7, 2007
    #12
  13. Martin Brown wrote:
    >
    > On Oct 5, 6:58 pm, John Larkin
    > <> wrote:
    > > On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:46:45 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
    > >
    > > <> wrote:
    > > >I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    > > >magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    > > >cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    > > >there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?

    > >
    > > >I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    > > >obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    > > >destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.

    > >
    > > >Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.

    > >
    > > Ionize some gas maybe?

    >
    > It works pretty well to ionise Helium for a microwave induced plasma
    > as an ion source for ICP-MS, that is provided that you don't mind the
    > risk of catarracts, blindness and frying your kidneys. I once walked
    > into a lab where a senior researcher (who should know better) was
    > adjusting one with all interlocks off and the plasma fully exposed.
    > Surprisingly pleasing pale reddish coloured flame but I was out of
    > there instantly. About 1kW output and a spark to start the thing at
    > atmospheric pressure. eg.
    >
    > http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/sas/sas/2001/00000055/00000002/art00003
    >
    > By comparison the RF ICPMS argon plasma flames are unpleasantly bright
    > and UV rich but nothing like as dangerous.
    >
    > Anyone without the requisite knowledge to keep the microwaves safely
    > confined can expect to get some very nasty complications from
    > microwave exposure.
    >
    > Regards,
    > Martin Brown


    There are methods for doing so. The Next Big Thing in lighting is
    microwave powered gas discharge lighting. No electrodes to wear out.

    --
    Paul Hovnanian mailto:p
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    Disclaimer - These opiini^H^H damn! ^H^H ^Q ^[ .... :w :q :wq :wq! ^d
    exit X Q ^C ^? :quitbye CtrlAltDel ~~q :~q logout save/quit :!QUIT
    ^[zz ^[ZZZZZZ ^H man vi ^@ ^L ^[c ^# ^E ^X ^I ^T ? help helpquit ^D
    man quit ^C ^c ?Quit ?q CtrlShftDel "Hey, what does this button d..."
    Paul Hovnanian P.E., Oct 7, 2007
    #13
  14. "Paul Hovnanian P.E." <> hath wroth:

    >There are methods for doing so. The Next Big Thing in lighting is
    >microwave powered gas discharge lighting. No electrodes to wear out.


    I hope not. None of them have come close to meeting FCC Part 15
    unintentional radiator limits. The original microwave sulfur lamp was
    originally promoted by Fusion Lighting in the mid 1990's. The FCC
    sorta, kinda, maybe, somewhat killed the idea in 2003. Achrived web
    site at:
    <http://web.archive.org/web/20010209135028/http://www.fusionlighting.com/>

    "Sulfur Lamps"
    <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur_lamp>

    "FCC Rejects Satellite Radio's Petition to Ban RF Lights in 2.45 GHz
    Band"
    <http://www.rwonline.com/dailynews/one.php?id=6211>

    "Fusion calls "timeout" in sulfur lamp race"
    <http://www.iaeel.org/IAEEL/Newsl/1998/tva1998/LiMa_a_2_98.html>

    Unfortunately, raising the dead is a common preoccupation in
    electronics. LG and Island Systems Lighting(UK) have resurrected the
    idea. Hopefully, it experience a quick product death.

    Of course, there are less obnoxious forms of plasma lighting:
    <http://www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/science/964e/>
    Powered by a USB port. I want one.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann
    150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    Jeff Liebermann, Oct 7, 2007
    #14
  15. Paul Hovnanian P.E.

    Chris Jones Guest

    Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:

    > I recently inherited a microwave oven with a damaged door latch. The
    > magnetron works, but the rest of the oven isn't worth saving. Before I
    > cannibalize it for parts (like the HV supply and some kewl magnets), are
    > there any (safe and legal) uses for the working magnetron?
    >
    > I'm ruling out microwave weapons, anti police radar devices, etc for
    > obvious reasons, but if there's something to be done with this before
    > destroying it, I might add it to my projects list.
    >
    > Links to project web sites would probably be best. Thanks.
    >


    Build a sulfur lamp?
    Chris Jones, Oct 8, 2007
    #15
  16. In <>, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    >"Paul Hovnanian P.E." <> hath wroth:
    >
    >>There are methods for doing so. The Next Big Thing in lighting is
    >>microwave powered gas discharge lighting. No electrodes to wear out.

    >
    >I hope not. None of them have come close to meeting FCC Part 15
    >unintentional radiator limits. The original microwave sulfur lamp was
    >originally promoted by Fusion Lighting in the mid 1990's. The FCC
    >sorta, kinda, maybe, somewhat killed the idea in 2003. Achrived web
    >site at:
    ><http://web.archive.org/web/20010209135028/http://www.fusionlighting.com/>
    >
    >"Sulfur Lamps"
    ><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur_lamp>


    Says the sulfur bulb has a design life expectancy of 60,000 hours, and
    that the magnetron needed to supply the microwaves has a design life
    expectancy of 15,000-20,000 hours.
    Meanwhile, I remember from elsewhere even shorter life expectancy being
    usual for magnetrons - I generally got the impression of 10,000 hours.

    >"FCC Rejects Satellite Radio's Petition to Ban RF Lights in 2.45 GHz
    >Band"
    ><http://www.rwonline.com/dailynews/one.php?id=6211>


    I think that would support a contention that FCC did not kill the sulfur
    lamp.

    The Wiki article even notes that FCC in 2003 terminated a proceeding
    started in 1998 that otherwise would have increased regulation of RF
    emissions from sulfur lamp systems.

    <SNIP>

    - Don Klipstein ()
    Don Klipstein, Oct 8, 2007
    #16
  17. (Don Klipstein) hath wroth:

    >>"Sulfur Lamps"
    >><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur_lamp>

    >
    > Says the sulfur bulb has a design life expectancy of 60,000 hours, and
    >that the magnetron needed to supply the microwaves has a design life
    >expectancy of 15,000-20,000 hours.
    > Meanwhile, I remember from elsewhere even shorter life expectancy being
    >usual for magnetrons - I generally got the impression of 10,000 hours.


    Google found claims of 2,000 hours for a microwave oven magnetron.
    <http://gallawa.com/microtech/Ch7Pg6.html>
    My guess would be even less based on personal experience with bottom
    of the line consumer microwave ovens. I wonder if they have a runtime
    timer built into the clock/timer circuitry?

    >>"FCC Rejects Satellite Radio's Petition to Ban RF Lights in 2.45 GHz
    >>Band"
    >><http://www.rwonline.com/dailynews/one.php?id=6211>

    >
    > I think that would support a contention that FCC did not kill the sulfur
    >lamp.
    >
    > The Wiki article even notes that FCC in 2003 terminated a proceeding
    >started in 1998 that otherwise would have increased regulation of RF
    >emissions from sulfur lamp systems.


    True. I tried to be subtle. My opinion is that the FCC did not find
    it expedient to do anything nice for XM or Sirius. The problem was
    that they also had issues pending over their terrestrial repeaters and
    Wi-Fi interference.
    <http://www.computerworld.com/governmenttopics/government/policy/story/0,10801,69893,00.html>
    <http://www.news.com/2100-1033-933965.html>
    The satellite people are also having problems with the WiMax users:
    <http://www.asteriskvoipnews.com/wimax/wimax_vendors_bemoan_satellite_radio_interference_in_the_2_ghz_band.html>
    <http://satelliteradiotechworld.blogspot.com/2007/09/xmsirius-reject-wcs-coalitions-proposal.html>
    What the FCC apparently did was hand the interference issues back to
    XM and Sirius with subtle hints that they should clean up their design
    with better BPF filters and fix their own technical problems first.

    In the case of the sulfur lamp, it was easy because during the 5 years
    it took for the FCC to render a non-decision, Fusion Lighting dropped
    the product and disappeared. There was no need to protect the bird
    people from a non-existent product. The technical problem was that
    there was no way Fusion Lighting could meet Part 15 certification
    requirements. The bulbs leaked RF badly and no amount of RF shielding
    seemed to be effective. However, that leaves the door open to other
    companies to try and get it type certified.

    Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not
    necessarily represent the hidden agendas and political intrigues of
    the FCC.

    --
    Jeff Liebermann
    150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    Jeff Liebermann, Oct 8, 2007
    #17
  18. Paul Hovnanian P.E.

    Joel Kolstad Guest

    "Jeff Liebermann" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > Unfortunately, raising the dead is a common preoccupation in
    > electronics.


    Actually I would suggest that "raising the dead" by those who are well aware
    of the initial causes of death is a very good idea: As technology advices,
    many old ideas that were once impractical become quite viable.

    I would agree that (too) many people "raising the dead" aren't even aware that
    their "new" idea is quite old nor what the appropriate history is -- this
    seems to be the case with some fo the folks promoting wireless re-charging
    stations these days.
    Joel Kolstad, Oct 8, 2007
    #18
  19. Paul Hovnanian P.E.

    Tim Williams Guest

    You remind me of my class D tube amp project.
    http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms/Elec_Compound.html

    I do wonder if anyone's ever done it before, you know, in history...

    Tim

    --
    Deep Fryer: A very philosophical monk.
    Website @ http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms

    "Joel Kolstad" <> wrote in message
    news:...
    > "Jeff Liebermann" <> wrote in message
    > news:...
    > > Unfortunately, raising the dead is a common preoccupation in
    > > electronics.

    >
    > Actually I would suggest that "raising the dead" by those who are well

    aware
    > of the initial causes of death is a very good idea: As technology

    advices,
    > many old ideas that were once impractical become quite viable.
    >
    > I would agree that (too) many people "raising the dead" aren't even aware

    that
    > their "new" idea is quite old nor what the appropriate history is -- this
    > seems to be the case with some fo the folks promoting wireless

    re-charging
    > stations these days.
    >
    >
    Tim Williams, Oct 8, 2007
    #19
  20. "Joel Kolstad" <> hath wroth:

    >"Jeff Liebermann" <> wrote in message
    >news:...
    >> Unfortunately, raising the dead is a common preoccupation in
    >> electronics.


    >Actually I would suggest that "raising the dead" by those who are well aware
    >of the initial causes of death is a very good idea: As technology advices,
    >many old ideas that were once impractical become quite viable.


    Sigh. I was afraid someone was going to take me seriously. Once upon
    a time, I designed a radio direction finder, where the basic
    principles were extracted from a 1920's radio physics book. I've done
    other modernization projects, from electric car controllers borrowing
    technology from about 1910[1], to borrowing overprice military
    technology, that magically became affordable.

    What engineering I've done in the past, is almost all "raising the
    dead" if I include cleaning up someone else's mess, or picking up
    projects after the funding died. For a while, my title was "Post
    Mortem Engineering" in honor of my actual job function. Unfortunately,
    my constant complaining was heard by management and whatever gods are
    in charge of engineering, and subsequent projects turning into
    cloning. Instead of raising the dead, I was now re-raising the
    living. Sigh.

    There's another benefit to raising the dead and reading up on old
    technology. Many of the basic principles behind today's complicated
    technologies are more apparent in the original crude forms, than they
    are in the modern implementations.

    >I would agree that (too) many people "raising the dead" aren't even aware that
    >their "new" idea is quite old nor what the appropriate history is -- this
    >seems to be the case with some fo the folks promoting wireless re-charging
    >stations these days.


    Yep, but it won't help. Most new engineers want to do everything
    themselves. Not invented here syndrome is epidemic. I did that for a
    while, until I realized that reinventing the wheel was not a very
    productive use of my time. So, I switched to the dark side and went
    to "progress through plagiarism". The result was a large collection
    of "Ideas for Design", competitors manuals, patents, old technical
    books (which I still collect), and the usual reverse engineering. My
    designs and career moved along much better after that, although there
    was one problem. I never again had an original idea.


    [1] Electric milk delivery vehicles were very popular between about
    1910-1924(?) because they didn't make any noise during their early
    morning delivery rounds.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann
    150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
    Jeff Liebermann, Oct 8, 2007
    #20

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

It takes just 2 minutes to sign up (and it's free!). Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum.
Similar Threads
  1. Br Dan Izzo
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    1,341
    Captain Blammo
    Sep 8, 2004
  2. Soyrunner

    Samsung Microwave & GE Microwave oven

    Soyrunner, Sep 20, 2004, in forum: Electronic Repair
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    1,092
    Sam Goldwasser
    Mar 15, 2005
  3. KORISNIK

    microwave magnetron power rating?

    KORISNIK, Apr 24, 2009, in forum: Electronic Design
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    685
    GregS
    Apr 28, 2009
  4. KORISNIK

    microwave magnetron power rating?

    KORISNIK, Apr 24, 2009, in forum: Electronic Repair
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    671
    GregS
    Apr 28, 2009
  5. jrkinney102460

    Kenmore microwave magnetron

    jrkinney102460, Aug 6, 2012, in forum: Electronics Repair
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    329
    CocaCola
    Aug 6, 2012
Loading...

Share This Page