Re: The True Spirit of soc.men

On 15 May 2007 17:15:23 -0700, Masculist <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On May 15, 4:51 pm, "Liberator" <n...@thistime.com> wrote:
>> "GL Fowler" <k...@NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Tue, 15 May 2007 15:53:58 -0700, "Liberator" <n...@thistime.com>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >>soc.men will surely go down in the history of sociological pathologies.
>> >>It is a singularly rare event to come across such a collection of pure,
>> >> frank and unadulterated expressions of naked human evil.
>>
>> >>The "Gold List" typifies the elitist and supremacist nature of this group
>> >>perfectly.
>>
>> >>"Viking" identifies himself as a blond blue-eyed beast and
>> >>member of the nordic Super Race.
>>
>> >>The stench of the grave permeates their every post.
>>
>> > And yet here you are, clutching clutching your mantle of indignant
>> > righteousness around your noble shoulders!
>>
>> Ah the brown shirts arrive on a cloud of rhetoric.
>>
>> If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem,
>> and no decent self-respecting human being could come across
>> such manifest evil without passing comment.
>>
>> I guess that lets you out Fowler.
>>
>> I am told the only thing neccessary for the triumph of evil is that good men
>> do nothing.
>> You seem the sort of man that would sit quietly while his neighbors were
>> dragged away in the night.
>>
>> Shouting at women and children is all you are fit for.
>
>Could someone please interpret what "Liberator" is blabbing about
>here?

Sure thing


> This is usenet for crissakes, not nazi Germany. Because
>someone calls Liberator an "asshole", which apparently is an apt
>description, doesn't mean they are dragging people off to the gas
>chamber. What's up with Liberator? Is he stuck in the feminist and
>identity group past?

MY interpretation is that he refers to these kind of soc.men posters
and is shocked that even Jews such as Grizzlie Antagonist do not even
murmur a word to suggest it's inappropriate.

Therefore it's taken as acceptable to soc.men.

On May 15, 9:18 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
wrote:
> "Joe Bruno" <b...@indystart.com> wrote in message
>
> news:(E-Mail Removed) ups.com...
>
> > On May 15, 8:20 pm, "John D. Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> > wrote:
> >> In the interest of free speech, the above question is posed.
>
> > The issue of free speech is irrelevant. The Internet is private
> > property, to which the First Amendment does not apply.
>
> > Just as the editor of a newspaper can decide on his own which articles
> > to publish and which to leave out, so can the operators of newsgroups
> > do the same.
>
> > Look at Stormfront and see how many people have been banned by the
> > moderators.
>
> Stormfront.what where?

Punch in Stormfront, org and go to their discussion forum, As you read
the individual posts, you will notice numerous ones labelled "account
suspended" or "account discontinued". They did it to me.

Why should I be a National Socialist?

I've noticed during my membership here that many of you have such
things as "APARTHEID!" and "HEIL HITLER!" in your signatures, and some
even sport National Socialist flags or symbols in your avatars or
signatures. The 88 in 14/88 can be interpreted as HH, Heil Hitler, and
many of you greatly admire the man and what he has done.

Don't get me wrong, I do not fully disapprove of Adolf Hitler as a
man.

I am led to wonder, though, about his philosophy and that of National
Socialists today.

Many others of you are what are called skinheads or are affiliated
with some other white pride group or association, such as National
Alliance or even the Klan. Some of you also have something mentioning
the SS, or other organizations like it.

So tell me,

Must I be a National Socialist to be a White Nationalist? Must I be a
White Supremacist to be a White Nationalist? As a Christian, can I be
Christ-like and still claim to be a National Socialist?

and most importantly,

Why should I be a National Socialist?
__________________
>
>[Smitty shakes Liberator] "Wake up wake up, it's the glorious future
>of the 21st Century and we can start fighting new and more glorious
>battles. Stop living in the past!"
>
>Now say after me, "Men are loving and advnce society while women are
>hateful and a drag on society with their selfishness and greed. We
>will help enlighten women and raise up men to their rightful place in
>society collectively. Both are God's children and therefore should be
>loved and valued equally though perhaps differently". Sound good
>Liberator?

Must I be a National Socialist to be a White Nationalist? Must I be a
White Supremacist to be a White Nationalist? As a Christian, can I be
Christ-like and still claim to be a National Socialist?

Can you Smitty?
Inquiring minds want to know.