Re: Storm Warnings: Extreme Weather Is a Product of Climate Change

In message
<314b9c9e-6ab2-41ed-9a13-(E-Mail Removed)>,
Michael Gordge <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>On Jul 3, 1:41*am, Bret Cahill <Bret_E_Cah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Storm Warnings: Extreme Weather Is a Product of Climate Change.
>
>Hahahhahah, are ewe hoping that explains the coldest June on record in
>one of the hottest populated places on earth?

Can you cite the source that says that this was a global event?

If it was localised then it has nothing to do with global climate
change.
--
(E-Mail Removed) ICQ #17887309 * Save the net *
Grok: http://spam.abuse.net http://www.cauce.org * nuke a spammer *
Find: http://www.samspade.org http://www.netdemon.net * today *
Kill: http://mail-abuse.com http://au.sorbs.net http://spamhaus.org

In message
<22b49031-a90b-40fc-9b9b-(E-Mail Removed)>,
Michael Gordge <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>On Jul 3, 8:22*am, Sapient Fridge <use_reply_addr...@spamsights.org>
>wrote:
>
>> If it was localised then it has nothing to do with global climate
>> change.
>
>Hahahha, **** ewe Kantians are sooo funny, so how come ewe loony
>lefturdian retards were using the droughts in Australia 'conclusive
>evidence' of your claim that the "globe" was getting hotter,

I have never claimed that, and anyone who says it's conclusive evidence
is wrong. It *is* evidence though, because it lasted 13 years (note
the difference between "evidence" and "conclusive evidence").

BTW: If you look carefully you will notice that 13 years is much longer
than the single month (June) that you offered as evidence that AGW
wasn't happening. If Australia goes back to normal weather patterns
over the next decade then I'm wrong of course, we will see.

> the
>climate was changing, because man isn't paying enough tax?

It's not lack of tax that is causing climate change, it's CO2

Apart from anything else the price of fossil fuel is going to go through
the roof in the next few years (it's already starting) so moving to
non-fossil fuels and renewable energy supplies makes sense even if you
refuse to accept the scientific evidence for AGW.
--
(E-Mail Removed) ICQ #17887309 * Save the net *
Grok: http://spam.abuse.net http://www.cauce.org * nuke a spammer *
Find: http://www.samspade.org http://www.netdemon.net * today *
Kill: http://mail-abuse.com http://au.sorbs.net http://spamhaus.org

In message
<08623baf-93ac-4e67-8ad6-(E-Mail Removed)>,
Michael Gordge <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>On Jul 3, 8:22*am, Sapient Fridge <use_reply_addr...@spamsights.org>
>wrote:
>
>> If it was localised then it has nothing to do with global climate
>> change.
>
>Stupid lying leftist ****, ewe lefturdian retards

I bet your insults work great in the school playground to impress the
other kids! Doesn't work so well outside of school.

>have been using
>localised events (localized cyclones, localized hurricans, localized
>droughts, localized floods) as your evidence of man making the globe
>hot since the hoax began, but when localized events are used to show
>the **** ewe are talking ewe dont like it and dont want to use them.

Single events are not evidence of climate change, patterns of events
are.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...droughts-fires

An increase in the frequency of extreme weather events is what was
predicted as the result of climate change, and that is what we are
seeing. Google "global weirding".
--
(E-Mail Removed) ICQ #17887309 * Save the net *
Grok: http://spam.abuse.net http://www.cauce.org * nuke a spammer *
Find: http://www.samspade.org http://www.netdemon.net * today *
Kill: http://mail-abuse.com http://au.sorbs.net http://spamhaus.org

In alt.philosophy Sapient Fridge <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
....
> I bet your insults work great in the school playground to impress the
> other kids! Doesn't work so well outside of school.

What insults? Niw Zilindrs tlk lk tht even wth thr moms -- think yourself
prvlgd.

--
[When complaining loudly about someone's arithmetic:]
"Androcles" <(E-Mail Removed)_ae>, 30 Dec 2010 10:53 UTC:
> Einstein's calculation is tau = t * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2),
> ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...ures/img61.gif
> 2.2usec * sqrt(1-0.999^2) = 0.098362 usec
> and NOT the measured 64 usec.
You have got t and tau around the wrong way.
-- Peter Webb, 31 Dec 2010
[And later:]
The only error is Einstein's, you snipping ignorant ****.
-- "Androcles" <(E-Mail Removed)_2011j>, 07 Jan 2011 04:20 UTC

Sapient Fridge wrote:
> Michael Gordge <(E-Mail Removed)> writes
>>On Jul 3, 1:41*am, Bret Cahill <Bret_E_Cah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Storm Warnings: Extreme Weather Is a Product of Climate Change.
>>
>>Hahahhahah, are ewe hoping that explains the coldest June on record in
>>one of the hottest populated places on earth?
>
> Can you cite the source that says that this was a global event?
>
> If it was localised then it has nothing to do with global climate
> change.

That's only fair, since global climate change has nothing to do with
reality.

Hope This Helps!
Rich

On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 22:32:52 -0400, "Jonathan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
>"Sapient Fridge" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>> Apart from anything else the price of fossil fuel is going to go through
>> the roof in the next few years (it's already starting) so moving to
>> non-fossil fuels and renewable energy supplies makes sense even if you
>> refuse to accept the scientific evidence for AGW.
>
>
>And guess what energy source the world, especially the
>rapidly growing third world and China, will turn to as oil
>steadily increases in price?
>
>Coal! Dirty stinky chock full of greenhouse gases...coal.
>That's when we'll see the trends of global warming
>more clearly, once it's too late.
>

In that regard it is clearly FAR too late already! However, fear not!
ALL is not lost! We have seen figures far worse in the distant time,
and mankind came through OK if somewhat bruised. We do have to accept
that change does happen. We have NO control at all over that. So,
buckle up! Learn to live with it! Manage the planet better for the
more distant future so no cataclysmic disaster befalls us! The word is
that signs are there may be a planetary cooling round the corner for
whatever reason. Maybe so, maybe not. But if so, a bit of warming can
do little harm meantime and may actually be good!

Harry Merrick.

On 2011-07-04, Jonathan <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> And guess what energy source the world, especially the
> rapidly growing third world and China, will turn to as oil
> steadily increases in price?

长江三峡大坝