On 7/3/2011 5:54 PM, John Larkin wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:40:19 -0600, hamilton<(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>> On 7/3/2011 3:57 PM, John Larkin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 08:21:44 -0700 (PDT), Scott Smith
>>>> http://vehiclerepair.org/schematicpro/schematicpro.htm
>>>
>>>
>>> Wow, what hideous schematics!
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>> What "should" a schematic look like ??
>
> Not like that!
>
>>
>> hamilton
>
> Well, sheet 1 should be a block diagram and table of contents:
>
> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/22SS346A.pdf
>
> The rest might look like...
>
> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/22S880A.pdf
>
> or
>
> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/22S490B_ch12.pdf
>
> ... something like that. We use PADS, which makes very nice looking
> schematics.
>
> This one is probably a little chaotic. I drew it on vellum, and gave
> it to The Brat to enter, and she has different ideas of how a
> schematic should look.
>
> ftp://jjlarkin.lmi.net/22S220A_20.pdf
>
>
> John
>
>
Hmmm, I don't see much difference.
Yours seem to have more "air" between the components.
Is that what you see as the main difference ?
If your looks so much better to you, then keep doing it that way.
hamilton
PS: I have to agree that having signals entering from the left and
leaving on the right would make it easier to understand.
However, if the signal is using the same connector as the input signals,
that would make it easier to understand the entire system.
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
