Re: DC Wave Questions

On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 14:33:39 -0500, John Fields
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On 12 Jun 2005 09:01:11 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>
>> It's a shame you have to weed thru all the crap from some
>> of the posters here who have a lot of time on their hands and
>> have no tolerance for those who are just learning their craft....
>
>---
>It's a shame that those of us who give of our time in an effort to
>edify the ignorant are often abused by imbeciles who can't take
>correction gracefully.

It is equally a shame that there are those that are sometimes
incapable of offering correction gracefully, eh, John? If it pains
you so much to engage in your ungracious edifying, perhaps you would
do well to bugger off, and leave the stress of educating imbeciles to
those with more patience.

--
Al Brennan

"If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9,
then you would have a key to the universe." Nicola Tesla

Kitchen Man wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 14:33:39 -0500, John Fields
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>
>>On 12 Jun 2005 09:01:11 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>>
>>
>>> It's a shame you have to weed thru all the crap from some
>>> of the posters here who have a lot of time on their hands and
>>> have no tolerance for those who are just learning their craft....
>>
>>---
>>It's a shame that those of us who give of our time in an effort to
>>edify the ignorant are often abused by imbeciles who can't take
>>correction gracefully.
>
>
> It is equally a shame that there are those that are sometimes
> incapable of offering correction gracefully, eh, John? If it pains
> you so much to engage in your ungracious edifying, perhaps you would
> do well to bugger off, and leave the stress of educating imbeciles to
> those with more patience.
>

Interesting! I thought John's response to the op was
called for. The OP is going to get himself into trouble
with the attitutde he's exhibited. In my opinion, John
saw through the BS and called a spade a spade. I don't
know whether the OP got it or not - but John made it
clear that the BS wasn't fooling anybody.

I'll have to go back and read it again in light of
your post.

Ed

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 04:14:08 GMT, ehsjr <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>Kitchen Man wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 14:33:39 -0500, John Fields
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>>>It's a shame that those of us who give of our time in an effort to
>>>edify the ignorant are often abused by imbeciles who can't take
>>>correction gracefully.
>>
>>
>> It is equally a shame that there are those that are sometimes
>> incapable of offering correction gracefully, eh, John? If it pains
>> you so much to engage in your ungracious edifying, perhaps you would
>> do well to bugger off, and leave the stress of educating imbeciles to
>> those with more patience.
>>
>
>Interesting! I thought John's response to the op was
>called for. The OP is going to get himself into trouble
>with the attitutde he's exhibited. In my opinion, John
>saw through the BS and called a spade a spade. I don't
>know whether the OP got it or not - but John made it
>clear that the BS wasn't fooling anybody.
>
>I'll have to go back and read it again in light of
>your post.

I simply feel it's prudent to carefully consider all responses, as
I've grown rather un-fond of the taste of my foot in my mouth. I
agree that the poster's attitude is obtuse at best, but flinging
off-hand insults is risky. I should know.

Besides, right now I'm the new guy in a new job after 30 years in
electronics, so I have to practice restraint. Practice, practice,
practice! :-)

--
Al Brennan

"If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9,
then you would have a key to the universe." Nicola Tesla