Spike wrote:
> Polly parroted:
>
>
>>1. You do not separately excite the E and H fields because
>>if you excite an E field, you get a corresponding H field, and vice-versa,
>>even if it is your intention to excite separately.
>>
>>2. The differential forms of Maxwell describe the fields at _EVERY_
>>infinitesimal point and there is no way that the attempt to excite two
>>separate fields from two separate mechanical contrivances will result
>>in registration at every single point. Indeed, it is doubtful that
>>registration
>>will be achieved at all at any infinitesimal point. In any case, as in (1)
>>above,
>>your E field will have its H, and your H field will have its E field
>>already.
>
>
> Your first point does in fact point to the anomaly regarding points in
> your second point, and you have therefore pointed up the answer to
> your own point. As you clearly have not thought this point through, I
> pointedly leave its discovery as an exercise for you. While you
> continue to struggle for technical excellence, doing this should help
> point you to the requirements demanded of scientific thinking, and the
> possibility of also taking your first tentative steps in that
> discipline. Further, as a guide, scientists do not use personal
> pronouns in their formal writings, so you might also like to rewrite
> your article in such a manner.
>
> from
> Aero Spike
and what would be the point of that?
--
;-)
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
http://turner-smith.co.uk