Electronics Forums

Electronics Forums > Newsgroups > Electronics Newsgroups > Electrical Engineering > Re: The CFA de-bagged (Was: Re: First "Del" and now "D'Alembertian"!)

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: The CFA de-bagged (Was: Re: First "Del" and now "D'Alembertian"!)

 
 
Spike
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-09-2005, 08:00 AM
Polly parroted:

>1. You do not separately excite the E and H fields because
>if you excite an E field, you get a corresponding H field, and vice-versa,
>even if it is your intention to excite separately.
>
>2. The differential forms of Maxwell describe the fields at _EVERY_
>infinitesimal point and there is no way that the attempt to excite two
>separate fields from two separate mechanical contrivances will result
>in registration at every single point. Indeed, it is doubtful that
>registration
>will be achieved at all at any infinitesimal point. In any case, as in (1)
>above,
>your E field will have its H, and your H field will have its E field
>already.


Your first point does in fact point to the anomaly regarding points in
your second point, and you have therefore pointed up the answer to
your own point. As you clearly have not thought this point through, I
pointedly leave its discovery as an exercise for you. While you
continue to struggle for technical excellence, doing this should help
point you to the requirements demanded of scientific thinking, and the
possibility of also taking your first tentative steps in that
discipline. Further, as a guide, scientists do not use personal
pronouns in their formal writings, so you might also like to rewrite
your article in such a manner.

from
Aero Spike
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-09-2005, 09:45 AM
Spike wrote:
> Polly parroted:
>
>
>>1. You do not separately excite the E and H fields because
>>if you excite an E field, you get a corresponding H field, and vice-versa,
>>even if it is your intention to excite separately.
>>
>>2. The differential forms of Maxwell describe the fields at _EVERY_
>>infinitesimal point and there is no way that the attempt to excite two
>>separate fields from two separate mechanical contrivances will result
>>in registration at every single point. Indeed, it is doubtful that
>>registration
>>will be achieved at all at any infinitesimal point. In any case, as in (1)
>>above,
>>your E field will have its H, and your H field will have its E field
>>already.

>
>
> Your first point does in fact point to the anomaly regarding points in
> your second point, and you have therefore pointed up the answer to
> your own point. As you clearly have not thought this point through, I
> pointedly leave its discovery as an exercise for you. While you
> continue to struggle for technical excellence, doing this should help
> point you to the requirements demanded of scientific thinking, and the
> possibility of also taking your first tentative steps in that
> discipline. Further, as a guide, scientists do not use personal
> pronouns in their formal writings, so you might also like to rewrite
> your article in such a manner.
>
> from
> Aero Spike

and what would be the point of that?
--
;-)
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
http://turner-smith.co.uk
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Walt Davidson
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-09-2005, 09:59 AM
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 09:45:36 GMT, Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Spike wrote:


>> Your first point does in fact point to the anomaly regarding points in
>> your second point, and you have therefore pointed up the answer to
>> your own point. As you clearly have not thought this point through, I
>> pointedly leave its discovery as an exercise for you. While you
>> continue to struggle for technical excellence, doing this should help
>> point you to the requirements demanded of scientific thinking, and the
>> possibility of also taking your first tentative steps in that
>> discipline. Further, as a guide, scientists do not use personal
>> pronouns in their formal writings, so you might also like to rewrite
>> your article in such a manner.
>>


>and what would be the point of that?


Ask 'pointyhead'.
;-)

73 de G3NYY

--
Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com
 
Reply With Quote
 
Spike
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      07-09-2005, 11:45 AM
Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote:

>and what would be the point of that?


It's a triumph of hope over experience, given this chap's posting
history - I'm sure you get the point ;-)

from
Aero Spike
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: NXP claims world's first sub 1 milliOhm MOSFET in a Power S08 ...Jul 8, 2009 ... NXP Semiconductors has unveiled the world's first n-channel sub 1 milliOhm 25 V MOSFET, PSMN1R2-25YL, and is claiming the lowest ever RDSon ... Archimedes' Lever Electronic Basics 4 09-30-2009 11:12 PM
Re: The CFA de-bagged (Was: Re: First "Del" and now "D'Alembertian"!) John Smith Electrical Engineering 165 08-10-2005 10:33 PM
Re: The CFA de-bagged (Was: Re: First "Del" and now "D'Alembertian"!) Reg Edwards Electrical Engineering 39 07-23-2005 03:09 PM
Re: The CFA de-bagged (Was: Re: First "Del" and now "D'Alembertian"!) Spike Electrical Engineering 46 07-23-2005 09:12 AM
Re: The CFA de-bagged (Was: Re: First "Del" and now "D'Alembertian"!) Frank Electrical Engineering 0 07-10-2005 03:46 AM