On 3/11/08 3:51 PM, in article 47475$47d70c71$45013908$(E-Mail Removed),
"amdx" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> "Don Bowey" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:C3FBEB75.B1D97%(E-Mail Removed)...
>> On 3/11/08 5:15 AM, in article 91512$47d674c2$18d6b40c$(E-Mail Removed),
>> "amdx" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Dave.H" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>>> news:039c2b9f-720f-49b2-ac76-(E-Mail Removed)...
>>>> On Mar 11, 6:05 am, "amdx" <a...@knology.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *and what's this stuff about a D cell on a crystal radio :-)
>>>>
>>>> I got the idea from one of Dave Schmarder's radios, #26
>>>>
>>>> http://www.schmarder.com/radios/crystal/26.htm
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>> My point was, the purists would shudder at the thought of an external
>>> power source on a crystal radio. Now if you extract the power from a
>>> strong
>>> local and use that to amplify a weak signal then your doing good work.
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The tube isn't being used as an amplifier, it's diode is used as a
>> switchable option to a SS diode. The battery is for it's filament.
>
> Ok then, the purists would shudder at the thought of an external
> power source on a crystal radio. Now if you extract the power from a strong
> local and use that to bias your diode then your doing good work.
> Gees Don, your acting like Phil but without the name calling :-)
> Mike
Geez Mike, why didn't you take time to see what the OP was doing?
If you wish to really be a purist you should insist one should use a coherer
for the detector, or a chunk of galena and a cats-whisker.
I think it's a bit cool to have two different detectors and be able to
switch between them, like in the good old days.