ehsjr wrote:
> lerameur wrote:
>> chuck wrote:
>>
>>> Well, you will have to lower the supply voltage to your project by steps
>>> to determine the approximate voltage at which it fails to operate
>>> reliably (or at all) and then set your warning light (comparator) to a
>>> voltage somewhat higher than that.
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>
>>
>> yes thats good, thanks
>>
>
> No - not good. The project may keep working, but
> discharging the cells too far risks damaging them.
> When the cells discharge to 1.0 volts per cell,
> it is time to recharge, regardless of whether your
> project is working.
>
> Watch out for "9 volt" rechargeable batteries.
> They are really 7.2 volts. There may be
> exceptions to that - I don't know.
>
> Ed
Ed has pointed out yet another design parameter. The problem is not that
the batteries would be damaged: every charge/discharge cycle decreases
battery capacity somewhat. Discharging below 1.0 volts causes greater
decreases.
One's purpose in life, however, is usually not the preservation of
battery capacity.
As the designer, you get to choose whether you want to keep the
batteries for as long as possible, at the price of frequent recharges;
or you want to recharge less frequently because it's a pain, with the
knowledge that your batteries might not last for as many recharges? as
many years? etc., etc.
Electronic design is full of tradeoffs. Haven't even mentioned
alternative battery chemistries, charging techniques, voltage
regulation, etc., all of which will affect battery life; and the
appropriate cost-benefit analysis. ;-)
Chuck
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----